The Ukiah Daily Journal

A fragile truce in Catholic bishops’ war over Biden

-

WASHINGTON >> The major news from the meeting of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops on Wednesday was what did not happen. After months of rancor, the leaders of the church decided to say nothing about the right of the second Catholic president of the United States to receive Communion.

This was something of a victory for more moderate and progressiv­e bishops who opposed weaponizin­g the sacrament against President Joe Biden because of his support for abortion rights. They share Pope Francis’s view that Communion “is not the reward of saints, but the bread of sinners.”

Yet the outcome at the meeting in Baltimore was more of a truce than a resolution as American Catholicis­m continues to struggle over fundamenta­l questions related to the church’s relationsh­ip with modernity, declining religious affiliatio­n and attitudes toward the secular world.

The relatively desultory debate was anticlimac­tic and reflected the exhaustion of a church riven by politics. Many more conservati­ve bishops had once hoped that the document on the Eucharist — reiteratin­g church teaching on the real presence of the body and blood of Christ in the bread and wine of the Eucharist — would include an explicit rebuke to Biden and other pro-choice Democratic politician­s over abortion.

The split about the relative priority of the abortion issue vs. church teachings on economic and social justice mirrors a larger argument about Pope Francis himself and his effort to highlight the church’s mission toward the poor and its obligation to join the fight to protect a dangerousl­y warming planet.

Votes during the meeting for various positions of leadership in the conference suggested the bishops are closely divided between supporters and critics of the pope — a sundering over Vatican authority that is itself unusual in American Catholic history.

The Vatican representa­tive to the United States, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, made clear in an address to the bishops on Tuesday that Francis does not welcome how the church is recapitula­ting the rancor of American politics.

“A divided Church will never be able to lead others to the deeper unity desired by Christ,” Pierre said. “The Church needs . . . attentive listening now more than ever if she is to overcome the polarizati­on afflicting this country.”

The loud applause that greeted the 222-to-8 vote Wednesday on the document was, as much as anything, an expression of relief at a conflict temporaril­y resolved with the mild language of compromise on the role of Catholic politician­s.

“Laypeople who exercise some form of public authority,” the document said, “have a special responsibi­lity to form their conscience­s in accord with the Church’s faith and the moral law, and to serve the human family by upholding human life and dignity.”

Yet some of the staunchest antiaborti­on bishops did not back down from their earlier comments during a brief debate this week. And the president of the Bishop’s Conference, Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles, had opened a new front in the internal battle earlier this month.

Criticizin­g “new social justice movements” as “pseudo religions” that “fill the space that Christian belief and practice once occupied,” Gomez took issue with “what we might call the ‘woke’ story.” He denounced “today’s critical theories and

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States