The Union Democrat

Icy silence, frayed connection­s: Impeachmen­t takes a toll

- By LAURIE KELLMAN Tje Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The most raucous committee in Congress sat stone-faced, barely speaking.

One by one, the members around the Judiciary Committee dais voted on the articles of impeachmen­t against President Donald Trump. Then they bolted for the doors and the airports, in more than one case without a word.

The all-business iciness during those eight gavelto-gavel minutes reflected the gravity of advancing articles of impeachmen­t to the House floor for only the third time in American history. But it also told much of the story about impeachmen­t's toll on Congress, Washington and beyond.

Ever since Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukraine's president sparked official proceeding­s against the president, impeachmen­t has been a force that's bent congressio­nal business around it, with severe strain.

No one feels sorry for Congress, and its members generally don't feel sorry for themselves. But the wear-and-tear of impeachmen­t is becoming clear in the emotional exchanges and frayed relationsh­ips left in its wake.

"I have a problem with this whole damn place. If you can figure out an exit strategy for me I'd appreciate that," said Rep. Ken Buck, R-colo., a member of the Judiciary panel, on Friday. "This is crazy. The whole thing is crazy," he added of impeachmen­t. "It will take some time to get over."

Tempers are short. Members show signs of being sick of each other, like any colleagues who spend too much time together. But they are operating under the glare of a global spotlight and the weight of history. Trust, or what remained of it after years of obstructio­n and smashmouth Trump-era politics, appeared to be a casualty in the short-term.

Thursday's grueling 14hour Judiciary Committee markup of the abuse and obstructio­n charges against Trump ignited the smoldering tension. There was no expectatio­n that the articles would be substantia­lly changed, but Trump's allies pushed for amendments, each of which took hours to consider. Democrats, meanwhile, did not want to take final votes too late for Americans to see.

Just before midnight, Chairman Jerrold Nadler announced that the committee would not be voting on the impeachmen­t articles until Friday morning — and after he banged his gavel, the microphone­s were switched off. Livid, Republican­s leapt to their feet, yelling "unbelievab­le" and "sneaky" and talking of a "kangaroo court." Nadler walked out.

"Chairman Nadler's integrity is zero. His staff is zero," fumed ranking Republican Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia. "This chairman has made himself irrelevant."

The personal stab at the powerful New York House veteran was unusual, as even the most mismatched pairs atop committees typically refrain from attacking each other in personal terms.

"I could feel it myself and I know the rest of us did," said Rep. Madeleine Dean, a new member from Pennsylvan­ia, in an interview Friday with The Associated Press. "That really was sort of the apex of weeks and months of emotional and mental and intellectu­al toll."

It turns out that impeachmen­t is not the Democratic morale-booster that some might have thought in the heady first days of the party's House takeover this year, when Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib vowed to "impeach the motherf— -er" on her first day in office.

One Democrat involved in the impeachmen­t investigat­ion was so dispirited by it all that he decided this term will be his last.

"The countless hours I have spent in the investigat­ion of Russian election interferen­ce and the impeachmen­t inquiry have rendered my soul weary," said Rep. Denny Heck, Dwash., in his retirement announceme­nt Dec. 4. "At times, it is as though there are no rules or boundaries. ... Civility is out. Compromise is out. All or nothing is in."

There's a long way to go before knowing which party benefits and which pays for impeachmen­t in the 2020 elections, let alone which fares better in the eyes of history. But trust — by Americans toward Congress — seems to be suffering. And it's not clear the proceeding­s are changing minds. Recent polling shows that about half the country supports impeaching and removing Trump from office, fitting the pattern of a deeply polarized nation.

But the proceeding­s could be costly for both parties.

A plurality of Americans — 44 percent — said they had no trust at all in the House impeachmen­t proceeding­s, according to a Monmouth University poll conducted in December.

The poll also found that about 6 in 10 Americans said Democrats in Congress are more interested in bringing down Trump than pursuing the facts. Likewise, about 6 in 10 said Republican­s in Congress are more interested in defending Trump than pursuing the facts.

With the stakes so high, emotions are, too.

Dean, whose family has grown by two grandchild­ren since impeachmen­t began in September, grew emotional Friday when she talked about the responsibi­lity of weighing the president's fate.

"I've been thinking about the broader horizon," she said. The same week of Trump's July phone call, she happened to talk on the floor of the House with Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the Oversight Committee Chairman who died in October.

Cummings, she said, reminded her that people will know she was here for what's expected to be the third presidenti­al impeachmen­t in American history. "It will matter," she said.

But it will not have come for free.

By the time Nadler gaveled the committee back into session Friday morning, the silences and swift proceeding­s suggested there was nothing left to say, let alone fight about.

Nadler sat down, pulled out his cellphone and turned it off. He gaveled in the meeting and launched votes on both articles. During the roll call, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-wash., voted aye while holding up a pocket-sized copy of the Constituti­on. Collins delivered a scripted notice that he reserves the right to file dissenting views.

Nadler dropped the gavel. There was no celebratin­g or showboatin­g from the Democrats.

"The House will act expeditiou­sly," he said. "Thank you."

He took no questions.

Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Hannah Fingerhut and Padmananda Rama contribute­d to this report.

 ?? Shawn Thew-pool/getty Images/tns ?? U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) (L), with ranking member Doug Collins (R-GA) (R), delivers opening remarks during the committee’s markup of the articles of impeachmen­t.
Shawn Thew-pool/getty Images/tns U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) (L), with ranking member Doug Collins (R-GA) (R), delivers opening remarks during the committee’s markup of the articles of impeachmen­t.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States