The Washington Post

Who’s behind those political ads on Facebook? Now, you can find out.


Facebook and Twitter forged ahead Thursday with new efforts to disclose more informatio­n about the political advertisem­ents that appear on their sites, part of a broad campaign to help users better understand why they see the content they do and who is behind it.

For both tech companies, the stakes are high ahead of the 2018 midterm elections, two years after Russian agents spread propaganda — through ads and other posts — on social media sites in a bid to create social and political unrest in the United States during the 2016 presidenti­al race.

Starting Thursday on Facebook, political ads will include a marker at the top indicating who has paid for them. Clicking on the label will bring users to a new repository of all political ads that have run on the site, along with informatio­n about the people who saw them, such as their age and location. The new rules cover ads about political candidates as well as hot-button policy issues such as gun control, immigratio­n and terrorism, and apply to Facebook as well as its photo-sharing app, Instagram.

For example, Facebook data reflect that there are more than 4,200 active political ads promoting posts from the official page for President Trump. The archive includes ad purchases since May 7.

“Our intent is trying to help people understand who is trying to influence them on political and social issues, and why,” Katie Harbath, Facebook's global politics and government outreach director, said on a call with reporters Thursday.

Twitter, meanwhile, said Thursday that it soon would require political advertiser­s to prove their identity before promoting tweets on the platform. In a blog post, the company said it also plans to label political ads “in the near future,” a promise it first made in October. Twitter said it is developing a separate policy for “issue ads,” the kind of content that Russian agents used on topics such as immigratio­n and gun control.

Along with Facebook and Twitter, Google previously promised more transparen­cy around political ads that appear in search results or on sites such as YouTube. This month, the search giant said it would begin verifying the identities of advertiser­s at the end of May, with a fuller database and report on political ads to come.

By implementi­ng these changes on their own, Facebook, Google and Twitter are trying to stave off tough new regulation from Washington, where lawmakers long have argued the tech industry hasn’t done enough to police content that appears online. Recently, members of Congress have demanded that major social media sites do a better job combating terrorist propaganda, removing hate speech and ensuring their powerful algorithms aren’t biased against conservati­ves — but it is Russian disinforma­tion that has worried lawmakers most.

On Facebook alone, ads purchased by the Kremlin-aligned Internet Research Agency reached about 10 million U.S. users during the presidenti­al race. Content from the IRA’s profiles and pages may have been seen by more than 140 million users on both Facebook and Instagram. And these Russian trolls similarly took their messages — stoking cultural, racial or political tensions — to Google-owned YouTube and Twitter during the 2016 election.

Last week, Facebook said it would apply its new political ad label even to stories from news outlets about political subjects. That sparked an outcry from publishers, including the News Media Alliance, an advocacy organizati­on representi­ng the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post.

On Thursday, though, the social giant acknowledg­ed in a blog post that “news coverage of elections and important issues is distinct from advocacy or electoral ads.” It said it would work with “news partners” to “help differenti­ate between news and non-news content.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States