The Washington Post

Lawmakers

Congress members may have hidden in same room as infected person

- BY PAULINA FIROZI, AMY B WANG AND MIKE DEBONIS paulina.firozi@washpost.com amy.wang@washpost.com mike.debonis@washpost.com

who hunkered down together for safety while a pro-Trump mob attacked the U.S. Capitol may have been exposed to someone in the same room who was infected with the coronaviru­s.

Lawmakers who hunkered down together for safety while a pro-trump mob attacked the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday may have been exposed to someone in the same room who was infected with the coronaviru­s, according to the Office of the Attending Physician.

“On Wednesday January 6, many members of the House community were in protective isolation in room located in a large committee hearing space,” Brian Monahan, the attending physician to Congress, wrote in an email that was sent to members of Congress on Sunday morning. “The time in this room was several hours for some and briefer for others. During this time, individual­s may have been exposed to another occupant with coronaviru­s infection.”

Monahan did not specify how large the group of lawmakers in the room was.

Two House aides confirmed to The Washington Post that Monahan was referring to a room where scores of House members were taken during the riot. Video first published by Punchbowl News on Friday showed maskless Republican­s — including Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Michael Cloud (Tex.), Markwayne Mullin (Okla.) and Scott Perry (Pa.) — refusing masks offered by Democratic Rep. Lisa Blunt Rochester (Del.) while in the room.

Monahan’s email advised lawmakers who may have been exposed to continue monitoring for symptoms, wearing masks and social distancing.

“Additional­ly, individual­s should obtain an RT-PCR coronaviru­s test next week as a precaution,” the email stated.

One House member, Rep. Jake Laturner (R-kan.), disclosed on Thursday that he had received a positive coronaviru­s test on Wednesday evening. But Pat Adams, a spokesman for Laturner, said Sunday that the congressma­n was not among the members who were taken to the lockdown area in question Wednesday afternoon.

Blunt Rochester tweeted Friday that while she was “disappoint­ed in my colleagues who refused to wear a mask, I was encouraged by those who did. My goal, in the midst of what I feared was a super spreader event, was to make the room at least a little safer.”

Separately, Rep. Charles J. “Chuck” Fleischman­n (R-tenn.) announced Sunday that he had tested positive. “Today, I learned that I have tested positive for COVID-19 after coming into contact with another infected Member of Congress, with whom I share a residence in D.C.,” Fleischman­n said in a statement.

He said he has been in isolation since Wednesday night, which is when he learned that the other lawmaker tested positive. A spokesman for Fleischman­n said the congressma­n was not in the lockdown area Wednesday.

Members of Congress qualified for priority access to the coronaviru­s vaccine, and many — but not all — have received at least the first shot of a two-dose regimen. Some congressio­nal staffers have received the vaccine as well.

More than 2 million cases have been reported in the United States so far this year, and for the first time, the seven-day average for new deaths has surpassed 3,000 deaths a day, according to a Post analysis. The daily death toll for the first time surpassed 4,000 just one day after Wednesday’s insurrecti­on. Experts have warned the storming of the Capitol could have been a supersprea­der event.

“There’s going to be chains of transmissi­on that come out of that kind of mass gathering,” former Food and Drug Administra­tion commission­er Scott Gottlieb said during an interview on CBS News’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “The crowd wasn’t adhering to what we know are good practices in terms of mask-wearing and other things. I think they deliberate­ly eschewed those things. So, yeah, we’re going to see chains of transmissi­on come out of that kind of a gathering, for sure.

Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told Mcclatchy on Friday that “you have to anticipate that this is another surge event.”

“Then these individual­s all are going in cars and trains and planes going home all across the country right now,” Redfield added. “So I do think this is an event that will probably lead to a significan­t spreading event.”

As the incoming administra­tion plans to take over the coronaviru­s response in days, President-elect Joe Biden announced plans to expedite the vaccinatio­n process by releasing nearly all available doses of the vaccine.

The announceme­nt has prompted experts and state leaders to debate whether the approach is the best path forward.

In a CNN interview on Sunday, Ashish K. Jha, a physician and dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, backed the idea and said that “we’ve got to start getting people vaccinated far more quickly.”

Some public health experts have expressed concern that it could delay people in getting the second dose. The two coronaviru­s vaccines authorized for use in the United States require a two-dose regimen to be fully effective.

In an interview Friday on PBS Newshour, Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert at Children’s Hospital of Philadelph­ia and a member of the external advisory committee to the FDA, called Biden’s plan a “big bet, and I think an unnecessar­y bet.”

“They’re assuming that they’re going to be able to mass-produce, mass-distribute and mass-administer that second dose in a timely manner, where then you’re still getting that second dose three or four weeks later, or maybe five weeks later, or six weeks later,” Offit said. “What worries me is that it might not be then. It might be two months later or three months later or, worse, that some people wouldn’t get a vaccine at all.”

Last week, Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and head of the U.S. pandemic response, talked about the idea of “stretching out” supply without reserving a second dose.

“We don’t think it’s a good idea,” Fauci said. “To stretch out and you don’t get your second dose until maybe three or four months, there’s no scientific data that proves that. And since we want to maintain our credibilit­y and do things right according to the science, we want to do it exactly the way it was shown in the clinical trial.”

Asked by CNN about Fauci’s recent remarks, Jha said he agreed there’s “no reason to wait three or four months for the second dose, people need the second dose.” But he said he has no reason to believe manufactur­ing will slow down or prevent individual­s from getting their second shots on time.

“So I don’t know that I disagree so much with Dr. Fauci as much as I would put emphasis on getting vaccines out quickly and count on that second dose showing up in plenty of time for people to get vaccinated with their second dose, which everybody needs,” Jha said.

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) said he’s “not sure” what the best move is but said he’s in discussion­s with the Biden team, Trump administra­tion officials and other governors about the path ahead.

“We want to make sure we don’t run out of that second dose, so the people that got the first one, we have to have those,” Hogan said Sunday during an interview on CNN’S “State of the Union.” “It’s a gray area, so where can we ramp up the production? Right now, we’re not getting them out fast enough into people’s arms.”

 ??  ??
 ?? AMANDA VOISARD FOR THE WASHINGTON POST ?? Congressio­nal staff members hunker down with police after rioters breached the Capitol on Wednesday. Health experts warned that the attack could have been a supersprea­der event.
AMANDA VOISARD FOR THE WASHINGTON POST Congressio­nal staff members hunker down with police after rioters breached the Capitol on Wednesday. Health experts warned that the attack could have been a supersprea­der event.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA