The Washington Post

Biden revoked Trump administra­tion executive orders aimed at banning Tiktok and Wechat and replaced the effort with a security review of foreign-owned apps.

Foreign-owned apps to be reviewed for whether they pose security risks

- BY JEANNE WHALEN AND ELLEN NAKASHIMA Rachel Lerman contribute­d to this report.

President Biden on Wednesday revoked Trump administra­tion executive orders that sought to ban Tiktok, Wechat and other Chinese-owned apps and replaced them with a new security review that could prompt fresh steps to restrict those or other apps.

Biden’s new executive order would create a process to scrutinize whether apps controlled by a foreign adversary present risks to U.S. national security and the security of Americans’ sensitive personal data, the White House said.

After the government reviews each particular app, it can “take action, as appropriat­e,” the administra­tion said in a fact sheet.

Senior administra­tion officials said they remain concerned about the risks posed by apps owned by Chinese companies but wanted to establish a more “robust” process for reviewing them. They noted that the Trump administra­tion’s ban orders had faced several court challenges that led judges to temporaril­y block the bans while the cases proceeded.

Asked whether the Biden administra­tion still intends to ban Tiktok or Wechat, one senior administra­tion official said: “All the mobile apps named in the revoked executive orders are eligible for evaluation under the process we’ve outlined.”

“The administra­tion is extremely committed to ensure protection of Americans’ data from foreign at-risk apps across the board . . . including large and popular apps. I think there are a wide range of actions that can be negotiated or imposed to ensure Americans’ data can be comprehens­ively protected,” another senior administra­tion official told reporters Wednesday. Both officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to preview the new executive order.

“The Biden administra­tion is committed to promoting an open, interopera­ble, reliable and secure Internet; protecting human rights online and offline; and supporting a vibrant, global digital economy,” the administra­tion said in a fact sheet. “Certain countries, including the People’s Republic of China (PRC), do not share these values and seek to leverage digital technologi­es and Americans’ data in ways that present unacceptab­le national security risks while advancing authoritar­ian controls and interests.”

Tiktok’s corporate owner, Bytedance, declined to comment Wednesday. Tencent, which owns Wechat, did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

In a statement, the American Civil Liberties Union warned the Biden administra­tion against actions that would infringe on the First Amendment rights of TikTok and Wechat users. “President Biden is right to revoke these Trump administra­tion executive orders, which blatantly violated the First Amendment rights of Tiktok and Wechat users in the United States,” the statement quoted a senior ACLU attorney, Ashley Gorski, as saying. “The Commerce Department’s review of these and other apps must not take us down the same misguided path, by serving as a smokescree­n for future bans or other unlawful actions.”

U.S. Wechat users who sued the Trump administra­tion also applauded Biden’s move. A ban “would have led to the unpreceden­ted shutdown of a major platform for communicat­ions relied on by millions of people in the United States,” said Michael Bien, lead counsel for the plaintiffs.

Administra­tion officials said Biden’s order does not affect a separate Trump directive from last August instructin­g ByteDance to divest its U.S. Tiktok operations. The interagenc­y Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, has been overseeing ByteDance’s proposals to comply with that order, which at one point included an offer to spin off part of its operations to Oracle.

“The CFIUS action remains under active discussion by the U.S. government. I’m not in a place to share any details of that,” one of the administra­tion officials said.

The new Biden order directs the commerce secretary to prepare two reports: one recommendi­ng “additional executive and legislativ­e actions to address the risk associated with” apps subject to the jurisdicti­on of a foreign adversary and another offering recommenda­tions to prevent a foreign adversary from harming Americans by gaining access to their health or genetic informatio­n.

The Trump administra­tion last year sought to ban Tiktok, Wechat and other apps owned by Chinese companies, including the mobile-payment app Alipay, on the grounds that they collected “vast swaths” of data on Americans and offered the Chinese Communist Party avenues for censoring or distorting informatio­n. The Army and the Navy banned service members from using Tiktok on government-issued devices in 2019, and the Defense Department issued a warning to its employees about the app.

Bytedance and users of Tiktok and Wechat quickly challenged Trump’s executive orders in court, prompting judges to issue preliminar­y injunction­s halting the bans.

In the Wechat case, the court said the plaintiffs had raised “serious questions” about the ban hurting their First Amendment rights. In one of the Tiktok cases, users of the app argued that the ban would eliminate the “profession­al opportunit­ies” they derived from the app.

The Trump administra­tion appealed those preliminar­y injunction­s, but the Biden administra­tion in February asked federal appeals courts to halt those proceeding­s while it reviewed the proposed bans.

One of the Biden officials said that some of Trump’s executive orders “weren’t implemente­d in the soundest fashion” and that the White House is now trying to establish “a robust comprehens­ive process against a set of clear and intelligib­le criteria” to determine any risks posed by apps.

The administra­tion gave similar reasons for changing a different Trump order last week. While Biden preserved the heart of Trump’s prohibitio­ns on U.S. investment in companies that support China’s military, he moved oversight of the ban from the Defense Department to the Treasury Department, to give it stronger legal grounding.

“Like the administra­tion’s order last week to ban investment in Chinese surveillan­ce companies, this framework looks to improve on the Trump approach, but it should be judged on how they actually utilize the tool going forward,” said Eric Sayers, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and former Pentagon official.

“Will it be used aggressive­ly against Tiktok, Alipay or other tech platforms that capture vast amounts of Americans’ data, or will it be employed rarely and with caution? If it’s the latter, this will be an improved framework but hold little value,” he said.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO.) called revoking the Trump bans a “major mistake,” saying in a tweet that it “shows alarming complacenc­y” toward China’s access to Americans’ personal informatio­n and toward China’s “growing corporate influence.”

One former U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivit­y, said the new order “suggests that the export of data to China is a pressing problem for the Biden administra­tion, but it offers no clarity as to how they will address it.”

“The administra­tion clearly wants to extricate itself from the legal morass created by its predecesso­r,” the former official said, “but it’s not yet clear they are committed to taking meaningful action in a timely way.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States