The Washington Post

A building proposed for Takoma Park has faced an unusually powerful challenger: Maryland Comptrolle­r Peter Franchot.

- BY KATHERINE SHAVER

Developmen­t plans in Montgomery County often spark opposition from nearby residents, but a building proposed for Takoma Park and considered by county planning officials Wednesday has faced an unusually powerful challenger: Maryland Comptrolle­r Peter Franchot.

The state’s Democratic chief financial officer lives around the corner from the proposed developmen­t site and met about it twice with Maryland’s current transporta­tion secretary, Gregory Slater, when Slater was state highway administra­tor, according to state emails obtained by a developmen­t supporter via a public-records request. State highway officials would later consider the developer’s applicatio­n for a delivery truck pull-off area on a state road, which is critical to the project advancing.

The developer needs the pulloff area, known as a “layby,” on Carroll Avenue (Route 410) for trucks that would serve the proposed commercial building and the adjacent Takoma Park Silver Spring Co-op grocery store — part of a county requiremen­t for adequate loading space. The co-op’s delivery trucks now use the 1.2acre city-owned parking lot where the two-story building would be built.

The Maryland State Highway Administra­tion (SHA) has rejected the loading area, citing concerns over pedestrian safety and motorists having enough time to stop safely for trucks pulling out.

The Montgomery County Planning Board granted the developer’s request Wednesday for more time — until Jan. 20 — to try to change SHA’S mind, saying the agency had not clearly explained why it had rejected the applicatio­n. In testimony, Takoma Park resident Seth Grimes raised the possibilit­y of Franchot’s “untoward interventi­on,” and an attorney for the developer told the board that SHA’S slow and “ambiguous” responses were “completely unpreceden­ted” in her 20 years as a land-use attorney.

Casey Anderson, chair of the planning board, said he had “no doubt” the developmen­t proposal would “be approvable” if SHA signed off on the loading area.

“We’re not attempting to impugn anybody’s motivation or guess what may have been in their heads,” Anderson said of SHA.

“We want to just understand more clearly the rationale for their decision.”

Erin E. Girard, an attorney for the D.c.-based Neighborho­od Developmen­t Co., said SHA responded to the layby request in April, more than two years after the developer applied for it. She said the agency’s responses were “not factual,” as if the engineers who objected had not read the applicatio­n.

She told the board the developer has asked to meet with Slater and SHA Administra­tor Tim Smith “to say: ‘ Something is going on here. We’re talking past each other.’ They’re not acting like they do in every other developmen­t that they do in Montgomery County.”

Maryland transporta­tion officials and Franchot’s office said the comptrolle­r had no influence on the highway administra­tion’s decision to reject the layby for safety reasons.

Franchot meets with state and local officials about many issues outside his immediate purview, said his spokeswoma­n, Susan O’brien. It was “insulting to the profession­als at State Highway,” she said, for supporters of the project to suggest the layby was rejected for reasons other than a “fact-based analysis.”

“Just as elected officials and stakeholde­rs who were supportive of the project did, the Comptrolle­r met with state and county stakeholde­rs to communicat­e the concerns of the overwhelmi­ng majority of Takoma Park residents who were strongly opposed” to the developmen­t, O’brien wrote in an email.

Erin Henson, spokeswoma­n for the Maryland Department of Transporta­tion, said the agency rejected the loading area based on its own “thorough analysis,” as well as Montgomery transporta­tion officials’ “safety concerns.”

Henson said Slater and an SHA district engineer attended a community meeting on the developmen­t proposal with Franchot in 2018. She said Slater met with Franchot again in 2019 to “share an update” on SHA’S study of the area. That study was “agnostic” on the layby question and focused on long-term improvemen­ts for pedestrian­s, cyclists and motorists in Takoma Junction, the business district where the proposed building would go.

She said that residents at the community meeting “voiced concerns” about the loading area and that delivery drivers worried about having to park in the street when it was full.

The City Council solicited developmen­t proposals for the parking lot in 2014 to revitalize the business district — a half-mile east of the Takoma Metro station — in a way that would be “contextual­ly sensitive and environmen­tally sustainabl­e,” according to city and county documents.

However, the winning proposal, which includes office space above several stores and restaurant­s, has drawn a slew of criticism. Opponents in Takoma Park, a hotbed of liberal activism, said it would be too big for the area, consume public gathering space, spur gentrifica­tion and generate too much traffic. Many have voiced concerns about the viability of the 40-year-old co-op, a place that Franchot has publicly championed. The co-op filed a lawsuit against the developer and the city over the proposal in April, alleging breach of contract.

But some supporters of the project questioned the potential effects of Franchot’s interest, citing his power over state agencies from his seat on the Board of Public Works, which approves most state contracts over $200,000.

Franchot’s meetings with SHA officials were reported Monday by Takoma Park residents Carter Dougherty and Neal Cohen in a piece published on the website Medium. Dougherty, who said he supports the proposal, obtained state emails via a public-records request. They included three from Franchot staff members to Slater — two asking for meetings about the developmen­t and one seeking a “project map” that Slater had shown to Franchot in a previous meeting.

Dougherty and Cohen wrote that the emails showed Franchot had played a “highly inappropri­ate role” and “repeatedly interfered in the Takoma Junction revitaliza­tion process for what he perceived to be the benefit of a business located a stone’s throw away from his own home,” referring to the co-op.

None of the emails show that Franchot asked SHA to reject the loading area. In an interview, Dougherty said, “there’s really nothing else to discuss in that context with the State Highway Administra­tion. . . . The layby was the issue here.”

Dougherty cited a July 2019 email from Franchot’s then-chief of staff, Len Foxwell, to Slater asking whether Slater had five minutes “for a question that has NOTHING TO DO” with the Takoma Park proposal or a pending highway project but “is still important to Peter.” Dougherty and Cohen wrote that it showed “Foxwell was apologetic about having come to Slater so many times about this little developmen­t in Takoma Park.”

In an interview Tuesday, Foxwell, now a political consultant, said Franchot asked him to “check in from time to time” with Slater for updates on the SHA study. (Foxwell’s consulting clients include former Maryland attorney general Douglas F. Gansler, who is running against Franchot and seven others for the gubernator­ial Democratic nomination.)

“It’s no secret that Peter was pretty worked up” about the developmen­t’s potential effects on the co-op, Foxwell said. “His opposition to the project as proposed was pretty well known throughout Takoma Park.”

Foxwell referred questions about what Franchot discussed with SHA officials to the comptrolle­r’s office. However, he said, he disagrees with any assertions that Franchot had undue political influence on SHA’S decision to reject the loading area.

“Having worked with Greg Slater on a number of projects over time,” Foxwell said, “I have full confidence in the integrity of the study process and in the work product.”

 ?? BONNIE JO MOUNT/THE WASHINGTON POST ?? A view from inside the Takoma Park Silver Spring Co-op in 2018. The Montgomery County Planning Board granted the developer of a project proposed for the parking lot next to the co-op more time to seek the State Highway Administra­tion’s approval for a loading area.
BONNIE JO MOUNT/THE WASHINGTON POST A view from inside the Takoma Park Silver Spring Co-op in 2018. The Montgomery County Planning Board granted the developer of a project proposed for the parking lot next to the co-op more time to seek the State Highway Administra­tion’s approval for a loading area.
 ?? ROBB HILL FOR THE WASHINGTON POST ?? A spokeswoma­n said Maryland Comptrolle­r Peter Franchot (D) had no influence on an earlier SHA decision not to approve a loading dock for the project.
ROBB HILL FOR THE WASHINGTON POST A spokeswoma­n said Maryland Comptrolle­r Peter Franchot (D) had no influence on an earlier SHA decision not to approve a loading dock for the project.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States