The Washington Post

Djokovic battling for visa, legacy

Vaccine fight in Australia casts cloud on his pursuit of Grand Slam record

- BY LIZ CLARKE

For even exceptiona­lly conditione­d tennis champions, the window for winning Grand Slam titles narrows with age. No amount of experience or self-belief can compensate for the inevitable physical decline in explosiven­ess, nor can it forestall the rise of younger challenger­s with bigger games and comparable conviction.

This is the calculus now facing Novak Djokovic, 34, after Australia’s immigratio­n minister, Alex Hawke, revoked his visa Friday, citing “health and good order” grounds amid a falsehood on Djokovic’s immigratio­n form regarding internatio­nal travel he had taken in the 14 days before his Jan. 5 arrival at Melbourne’s Tullamarin­e Airport to compete in the upcoming Australian Open.

Djokovic’s lawyers are appealing the decision, and a judge agreed at a hearing late Friday not to seek his removal from the country until the court proceeding­s are resolved. If Djokovic’s bid fails, he would be deported.

Hawke’s decision casts new doubt on whether Djokovic, a nine-time Australian Open champion, will be allowed to compete for a men’s record 21st major singles title when the season’s first Grand Slam event gets underway Monday at Melbourne Park.

Djokovic, who is not vaccinated against the coronaviru­s, blamed his agent this week for what he called “human error” on his travel declaratio­n, which falsely said he had not traveled internatio­nally in the two weeks before he arrived in Australia. He also apologized for interactin­g with journalist­s for a French sports publicatio­n Dec. 18 despite learning two days earlier he had tested positive for the virus.

Hawke’s decision

announced the day after tournament officials unveiled the draw with Djokovic seeded first — is the next chapter in a 10-day circus over Djokovic’s eligibilit­y. It has roiled Australian citizens, outraged Djokovic’s Serbian compatriot­s, pitted Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison against state officials in Victoria and called into question the impartiali­ty of Tennis Australia, the governing body that runs the nation’s Grand Slam event.

If Djokovic is deported, the opportunit­y to make men’s tennis history at this year’s Australian Open falls solely to Rafael Nadal, 35, who is tied with Djokovic and 40-year-old Roger Federer (who is not competing as he recovers from knee surgery) with 20 majors.

Hawke’s decision represents a blow to Djokovic, the world’s No. 1 men’s player, on two levels.

It moves him one step closer to being denied one of four Grand Slam title opportunit­ies this season. And although he remains a national hero in his native Serbia, in the eyes of much of the tennis world, the episode has tarnished his integrity and a legacy he is still constructi­ng.

Djokovic would have entered this year’s Australian Open without a hitch, of course, had he gotten vaccinated against the coronaviru­s, which was required of all players unless they documented an approved medical reason that made them exempt.

Problems arose immediatel­y upon Djokovic’s arrival at Melbourne’s airport when Australian Border Force officers ruled invalid the medical exemption from vaccine requiremen­ts that the player had been granted by Tennis Australia and state health officials in Victoria.

Djokovic’s reason for requesting the exemption was that he had a recent case of the coronaviru­s, diagnosed in mid-december. That fell short of the national standard for valid contraindi­cations — conditions such as an allergy to a component of a vaccine that would imperil a person’s health.

After Djokovic spent five days in a government-designated hotel for immigrants in similar limbo, a federal judge overturned the government’s decision to deny his visa on procedural grounds.

Before the controvers­y over his medical exemption, Djokovic seemed all but assured of surpassing Nadal and Federer for the men’s record tally of majors. His best chance, in fact, was the first Grand Slam of the 2022 season.

No man or woman has won more Australian Open titles in the sport’s Open era than Djokovic. The lightning-fast hard court of Rod Laver Arena is tailor-made for his potent blend of offense and defense.

“If you have asked me six months ago or nine months ago, even at the U.S. Open [in September], I thought he was well on his way to smashing the men’s record,” Brad Gilbert, a former touring pro and coach-turned-espn analyst, said during a conference call Wednesday. “I thought he might [win] 25 to 27 majors.”

That is less certain now as the next generation’s challenger­s round into form and believe that Grand Slams are no longer the fiefdom of Djokovic, Nadal and Federer. Among them: Russia’s Daniil Medvedev, who routed Djokovic in straight sets to win the 2021 U.S. Open and deny the Serb’s bid for the rare calendarye­ar Grand Slam; Germany’s Alexander Zverev, the world’s No. 3 player and a 2020 U.S. Open finalist; and fourth-ranked Stefanos Tsitsipas of Greece, who was edged by Djokovic in a five-set 2021 French Open final.

Moreover, if Djokovic continues to refuse vaccinatio­n, it’s possible he will face additional hurdles entering France, England and the United States, which host the season’s remaining Grand Slams.

French officials have indicated that he will be able to compete at Roland Garros, where he is the defending champion but Nadal holds a record 13 titles.

England requires unvaccinat­ed visitors to present a negative coronaviru­s test taken two days before traveling, quarantine for 10 days upon arrival and follow up with subsequent negative tests.

The United States, at present, requires non-u.s. citizens to be fully vaccinated to travel to the country, with limited exceptions.

The pandemic’s future course — whether the omicron variant fizzles, whether new variants emerge — will largely dictate the freedom of unvaccinat­ed athletes and others to travel from one country and continent to another.

For tennis pros, the freedom to travel is essential to competing. The sport’s four Grand Slam events are held on three continents. The nine Masters 1000 events in men’s tennis, the most prestigiou­s tier next to the majors, are held in six countries: Canada, China, France, Italy, Spain and the United States.

Will these countries require visitors show proof of full vaccinatio­n? Will they offer exemptions for the non-vaccinated? If so, how liberal will the exemptions be?

“I think there will be numerous tournament­s and other majors [in which] he will no longer be able to participat­e if he chooses to stay unvaccinat­ed,” Gilbert said of Djokovic. “How are you going to sustain on tour? . . . It’s going to be a very difficult propositio­n to be a full-time player being unvaccinat­ed.”

Regardless of Djokovic’s pending legal appeal, there is no doubt he will retire as one of the game’s greatest players — if not the greatest.

Still, his internatio­nal profile — and his reputation among some of his fellow competitor­s — has been tainted by the episode, which included maskless interactio­ns with a group of children after he tested positive, although Djokovic claimed he had not yet received the test result.

His blitheness amid the pandemic’s highly contagious omicron variant runs counter to assurances he gave in the summer of 2020, after he, his wife, fellow pro Grigor Dmitrov and a handful of coaches contracted the coronaviru­s during an exhibition he staged in Serbia and Croatia without safety protocols to guard against transmissi­on. Djokovic apologized afterward and vowed to be more vigilant going forward.

Djokovic’s visa controvers­y has galvanized his support in Serbia, where his father, Srdjan, has characteri­zed him as a Christ-like martyr and victim of political persecutio­n. But empathy among fellow tennis players, who have largely steered clear of the controvers­y, is waning.

Tsitsipas, 23, who chose to get vaccinated to compete in Australia despite his own skepticism, told New Delhi-based WIO News this week that Djokovic was “playing by his own rules” and making other players “look like fools” for flouting the requiremen­t.

More than 90 percent of the top 100 men have been vaccinated, according to the Associatio­n of Tennis Profession­als.

If the careers of Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic ended today — amid the three-way tie with 20 majors — Djokovic’s achievemen­ts still make a compelling case that he is the best to ever play the game. He boasts a superior head-to-head record against both (27-23 over Federer; 30-28 over Nadal).

He also holds the men’s record for weeks ranked No. 1 (356, as of Monday). Only Steffi Graf, with 377, has more.

In the view of many sports fans, statistics are the sole metric of greatness. Others take a broader view.

Said the late Arthur Ashe, a three-time Grand Slam champion, former U.S. Davis Cup captain and humanitari­an: “True heroism is remarkably sober, very undramatic. It is not the urge to surpass all others at whatever cost but the urge to serve others at whatever cost.”

“I think there will be numerous tournament­s and other majors [in which] he will no longer be able to participat­e if he chooses to stay unvaccinat­ed. How are you going to sustain on tour? . . . It’s going to be a very difficult propositio­n to be a full-time player being unvaccinat­ed.” Brad Gilbert, ESPN analyst, on Novak Djokovic’s road ahead.

 ?? WILLIAM WEST/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES ?? Novak Djokovic is favored to kiss his ninth Australian Open championsh­ip trophy — if he gets to play.
WILLIAM WEST/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Novak Djokovic is favored to kiss his ninth Australian Open championsh­ip trophy — if he gets to play.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States