The Washington Times Weekly - - Politics -

“Trig­ger warn­ings that alert peo­ple to po­ten­tially sen­si­tive con­tent are in­creas­ingly pop­u­lar, es­pe­cially on col­lege cam­puses, but re­search sug­gests that they have min­i­mal im­pact on how peo­ple ac­tu­ally re­spond to con­tent,” re­ports the As­so­ci­a­tion for Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence.

“We, like many oth­ers, were hear­ing new sto­ries week upon week about trig­ger warn­ings be­ing asked for or in­tro­duced at uni­ver­si­ties around the world. “Our find­ings sug­gest that these warn­ings, though well in­tended, are not help­ful,” said lead au­thor Me­vagh San­son.

“It’s pos­si­ble that they func­tion the way they’re meant to, help­ing peo­ple to man­age their emo­tional re­sponses and re­duce their symptoms of dis­tress. But it’s also pos­si­ble trig­ger warn­ings could have the op­po­site ef­fect, in­flu­enc­ing peo­ple’s ex­pec­ta­tions and ex­pe­ri­ences in ways that ex­ac­er­bate their dis­tress,” noted the re­search, based on re­ac­tions of 1,394 peo­ple who were ex­posed to test warn­ings.

“We need to con­sider the idea that their re­peated use en­cour­ages peo­ple to avoid neg­a­tive ma­te­rial, and we al­ready know that avoid­ance helps to main­tain dis­or­ders such as PTSD. Trig­ger warn­ings might also com­mu­ni­cate to peo­ple that they’re frag­ile, and coax them in­ter­pret or­di­nary emo­tional re­sponses as ex­tra­or­di­nary sig­nals of dan­ger,” Ms. San­son noted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.