The Week (US)

Ukraine call pushes House toward impeachmen­t

-

What happened

House Democrats began formal impeachmen­t proceeding­s against President Trump this week amid revelation­s that Trump pressured the Ukrainian government to investigat­e former Vice President Joe Biden, one of his strongest potential rivals in the 2020 presidenti­al election. Notes from a call Trump made to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky show Zelensky asking for U.S. Javelin missiles and Trump then asking him for “a favor”—to investigat­e Biden and his son, Hunter, who once sat on the board of a Ukrainian company. Trump said the senior Biden had as vice president “stopped the prosecutio­n” of that company, and asked Zelensky to “look into it,” urging him to work with U.S. Attorney General William Barr and Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. Trump also pointed out that the U.S. has “done a lot for Ukraine.” Just days earlier, Trump had suspended $391 million in foreign aid to Ukraine—a decision later reversed because of bipartisan pressure from Congress.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Trump’s use of the power of the presidency to pressure a foreign government for personal political gain represents a “betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our elections.” After months of resisting impeachmen­t speculatio­n, Pelosi instructed the six House committees investigat­ing Trump to marshal evidence of impeachabl­e offenses as part of an “official impeachmen­t inquiry.” Trump “must be held accountabl­e,” Pelosi said. “No one is above the law.”

Democrats learned about the Ukraine call as the result of an official whistleblo­wer complaint about the president’s conduct with foreign leader, which the Trump administra­tion initially refused to share with Congress despite being required to do so by law. The complaint reportedly involves a troubling promise Trump allegedly made to a foreign leader, as well as other instances of potentiall­y illegal conduct, including the call to Zelensky. On Twitter, Trump raged at the growing likelihood he will be impeached. “There has been no President in the history of our Country who has been treated so badly as I have,” he tweeted. “Witch hunt!”

What the editorials said

Democrats “had no choice” but to start impeachmen­t proceeding­s, said the San Francisco Chronicle. Speaker Pelosi has done everything she could to make impeachmen­t a last resort, fearing the potential political backlash and knowing the Republican-controlled Senate is unlikely to convict the president. But at this point, it’s more dangerous not to impeach Trump. With his brazen attempt to seek foreign help for the 2020 election and subsequent moves to muzzle a government whistleblo­wer, Trump “has

What next?

openly declared himself above the law.”

Pelosi’s move toward impeachmen­t might thrill her Trump-hating base, said The

Wall Street Journal. The American people, however, “will want to see evidence that warrants overturnin­g an election.” Trump showed seriously bad judgment in his overtures to Zelensky. But “bad judgement is not a crime.” We still need to know a lot more about this case, including whether there was any specific quid pro quo regarding U.S. military aid. We also deserve to know “the role, access, and motivation of the whistleblo­wer.”

What the columnists said

Trump’s bullying of Ukraine isn’t just another partisan “mud fight,” said David Ignatius in The Washington Post. Ukraine, a vital American ally, is currently involved in a proxy war against Russia-backed separatist­s, and relies on U.S. assistance for its defense. But Trump’s apparent shakedown of the Ukrainian president turned U.S. commitment­s into Trump’s own personal “political tool.” That’s what pushed so many moderate Democrats to finally embrace impeachmen­t. American power should not be deployed for “the president’s personal political gain.”

Trump’s pressuring of Zelensky was “unseemly,” said Tom Rogan in Washington­Examiner.com, but “hardly rises to an impeachabl­e offense.” There was “no explicit quid pro quo” in the president’s call. Unless more evidence comes out, “Democrats do not have the smoking gun they would need for any prospect of successful­ly impeaching the president.” Trump’s defenders are kidding themselves, said David French in NationalRe­view.com. The call readout contains clear evidence of a quid pro quo. In fact, “the asks are very clear.” When Zelensky asks for anti-tank missiles to fight Russian proxies, Trump responds, “I would like you to do us a favor,” and begins talking about Biden. Zelensky later promises to have his prosecutor “look into the situation.” This was a “profound abuse of power.” Pelosi’s pronouncem­ent has changed “nothing and everything,” said Andrew Desiderio and

Kyle Cheney in Politico.com. “With her muscle behind the process, it is more likely than ever that articles of impeachmen­t will head to the full House for a vote.” But the Judiciary Committee has been calling its probes of Trump an “impeachmen­t investigat­ion” since July, with Chairman Jerry Nadler of New York asking the other House committees to begin sharing documents with his committee last month. It’s unclear what the time frame will be for actually drafting and voting on articles of impeachmen­t. The most immediate change may be one of mindset. “There’s a different energy,” said Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois, a member of the Intelligen­ce Committee. “There will be much more resources and effort toward that end. I also think there’s a dramatic difference tactically in courts when you have an impeachmen­t inquiry with the full body behind it.”

“It cannot be said that Democrats are doing this for political gain,” said Jonathan Chait in NYMag.com. Polls have repeatedly shown there is little political appetite for impeachmen­t. “Yet there is reason to believe the politics may change.” Unlike the byzantine particular­s of the Russia investigat­ion, Trump’s attempt to arm-twist Ukraine is relatively easy to understand. “His extortion of Ukraine’s government is perfectly in keeping with his stated belief that the powers of government can and should be put at the president’s personal disposal.” Impeaching Trump is “a gamble.” But so is doing nothing. Trump has shown he’ll do whatever it takes “to cheat his way into power.”

 ??  ?? Pelosi: Trump ‘must be held accountabl­e.’
Pelosi: Trump ‘must be held accountabl­e.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States