The Week (US)

Media: Should Google, Facebook pay for news?


“Do tech companies need publishers more than publishers need tech companies?” asked David Pierce in Protocol .com. We might be closer to getting an answer. Australia introduced a bill last week that will make Google, Facebook, and other tech platforms pay for news links. The tech industry initially saw the proposed law as little more than an excuse to force them to write “a big check with Rupert Murdoch’s name on it.” Facebook even thought it could simply tell the Australian government “to shove it,” blocking Australian­s from posting any news links on its site (see Best Internatio­nal Columns, p. 15). But after a few days of brinksmans­hip, both Facebook and Google are at the bargaining table, negotiatin­g how much they will pay to Australian news outlets after the law’s enactment.

This is not new territory for Google, which just last month set up a similar deal in France, said Mathieu Rosemain in Reuters .com. Google “agreed to pay $76 million over three years to a group of 121 French news publishers” to license content and settle copyright claims. Annual payments range from $1.3 million a year for France’s top daily, Le Monde, down to $13,741 for La Voix de la Haute Marne. Three top publishers negotiated an extra $3.6 million each, in part by agreeing to sell subscripti­ons through Google. All these numbers are a drop in the bucket compared with Google’s $183 billion annual revenue. Google can afford to lose some battles to win the war, said David Fickling in “The real motherlode for these businesses is their ability to act as intermedia­ries for a digital advertisin­g market that’s increasing­ly swallowing the world’s marketing budgets.” By ceding some ground in France and Australia, Google keeps its hands on the bigger prize: “Control and distributi­on of the world’s online informatio­n.”

“If Facebook does not want to pay for news links, and the links are not core to its business, it should not have to,” said Kara Swisher in The New York Times. Facebook says that news links make up less than 4 percent of its News Feed content, and publishers don’t have a right to demand special access to its platform. But the company’s clumsy response backfired and “played right into the hands of those who want to rein in the company for more legitimate reasons.” Google, for its part, just “invited every other country to pursue a similar protection racket,” said Casey Newton in Its fear was that removing links would “break the search engine in Australia, opening it up to rivals” such as Microsoft. But Google’s capitulati­on means other countries will follow suit. “A basic tenet of the Open Web—that hyperlinks can be freely displayed on any website—just took a body blow.”

 ??  ?? Other countries could copy Australia’s approach.
Other countries could copy Australia’s approach.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA