The Week (US)

Critical race theory: The culture war over schools

-

The Right has a new culture-war “obsession,” said Adam Harris in TheAtlanti­c .com. As conservati­ves tell it, American schoolchil­dren are in grave danger of being brainwashe­d by Critical Race Theory (CRT), a once obscure academic framework conceived by a Harvard law professor in the 1970s. CRT examines how “the nation’s sordid history of slavery, segregatio­n, and discrimina­tion is embedded in our laws” and continues to affect how people of color are treated by banks, police, employers, and schools. Conservati­ve critics make it sound as if there is a specific CRT curriculum being forced on schools, but what they actually oppose are school districts choosing to re-examine “the role that slavery and segregatio­n have played in American history” and possible ways of redressing “those historical offenses.” Republican­s have proposed legislatio­n in at least a dozen states to bar public schools from teaching that the U.S. is “fundamenta­lly racist” or addressing concepts such as “social justice.” The alternativ­e, said Brian Broome in Washington­Post.com, is the “white-centric” view of U.S. history I was taught growing up, in which Christophe­r Columbus “discovered” a largely empty America, slavery was a minor flaw fixed by Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King Jr. was a nice man who preached racial unity. Opponents of CRT want kids to be told, as I was, “There is absolutely nothing wrong with America. Nothing to examine.”

CRT is “more than just teaching kids to ‘think critically’ about the role that race has played in American history,” said the National Review in an editorial. It’s a form of indoctrina­tion, pushed by far-left political activists “seeking to renovate the American social order from root to branch.” In CRT’s “dogma of division,” everything is seen through the prism of race, and the only remedy for past discrimina­tion is the pursuit of “equity” through racial quotas and race-based policies. As anti-racist activist Ibram X. Kendi puts it, “the only remedy to past discrimina­tion is present discrimina­tion.” This toxic ideology “is going to destroy the country,” said Rod Dreher in TheAmerica­nConservat­ive.com. The Biden administra­tion wants to push CRT “on all public schools,” proposing a rule that would give priority to federal-grant applicants for history and civics programs that emphasize CRT concepts. More than half of Republican voters oppose teaching CRT in schools, so how is using taxpayer dollars to promote CRT “in any way” democratic?

If that all sounds panicky, said Michelle Goldberg in The New York Times, it’s intentiona­l. Republican­s are having a hard time generating fear and resentment of President Biden, whose agenda is quite popular. “They need a more frightenin­g, enraging villain to keep their people engaged,” and “critical race theory fits the bill.” CRT has become a “catchall” on the Right for any history curriculum reform or attempts to make schools more inclusive. In conservati­ve states, the political backlash to CRT is ferocious. In 2018, the affluent suburb of Southlake, Texas, got unwelcome national attention when a group of white students were videoed laughing and shouting the N-word, and another student was videoed telling a joke about lynching. Black students subsequent­ly described experienci­ng “unambiguou­s racism,” so local officials created a plan to address these incidents and educate students about bigotry. Conservati­ve parents were so “furious” that the town elected a new mayor, two new school board members, and two new City Council members who pledged to fight any teaching of CRT.

Good for Southlake parents for saying no to “woke education,” said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Voters overwhelmi­ngly rejected “a wholesale makeover of their children’s education” that would have included “diversity and inclusion” training at every grade level and encouraged students “to report each other for microaggre­ssions.” Not surprising­ly, Southlake voters were immediatel­y labeled bigots in the national media, said Christophe­r Rufo in NYPost.com. That illustrate­s the CRT “mousetrap”: Any objection to critical race theory “becomes irrefutabl­e evidence” of a dissenter’s “white fragility, unconsciou­s bias, or internaliz­ed white supremacy.”

These “fevered narratives” oversimpli­fy the CRT debate, said Clarence Page in the Chicago Tribune. As a Black man, I don’t agree that the U.S. is an innately racist nation akin to “apartheide­ra South Africa.” Nor do I believe discussing CRT and white privilege is “divisive, anti-American propaganda,” as former President Trump said last year. Yes, CRT too often “devalues the racial progress that Americans have made.” But at the same time, those who want students to focus on “the heroic and joyful side of our nation’s history” without being taught about its ugly racial past are engaging in a different kind of indoctrina­tion.

 ??  ?? Anti-CRT protesters in California
Anti-CRT protesters in California

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States