The Week (US)

The abortion pill

Mifepristo­ne is now at the center of the fight over abortion. Why was it created and approved?

-

What’s the pill’s origin?

In 1970, French endocrinol­ogist and biochemist Étienne-Émile Baulieu had an idea for an “unpregnanc­y pill” that could induce abortions. Such a pill, he thought, would enable women to avoid surgery and end pregnancie­s in private. Baulieu knew the hormone progestero­ne was essential to pregnancy and began searching for “an anti-hormone” that would block progestero­ne. His idea came to fruition in 1980, when a French drug company created mifepristo­ne, then called RU-486. In 1988, the pill was approved in France. More than a dozen countries followed, and in 2000, the FDA approved mifepristo­ne for use for up to seven weeks into a pregnancy in the U.S. Baulieu said he hoped “the ‘abortion pill’ might even help eliminate abortion as an issue.” But after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, enabling states to outlaw abortion, mifepristo­ne became a new battlegrou­nd for the same reason Baulieu sought to create it: It enables women to end pregnancie­s in their own homes. A federal judge with a long history of anti-abortion activism recently ordered the Food and Drug Administra­tion to revoke its approval; that ruling has been stayed and is likely to be ultimately decided on appeal to the Supreme Court.

How does it work?

Mifepristo­ne blocks progestero­ne, a hormone that prepares the uterus to receive and carry an embryo. The drug latches onto receptor molecules in place of progestero­ne, causing a miscarriag­e. In the U.S., mifepristo­ne is usually followed by a second pill, misoprosto­l, 24 to 48 hours later, which causes contractio­ns that empty the uterus. Misoprosto­l—which isn’t currently at risk of being taken off the market—can be used alone to induce an abortion. However, it’s only 87 to 93 percent effective on its own, compared with 95 to 99 percent when combined with mifepristo­ne.

How was the drug approved?

During the 1980s and ’90s, the U.S. banned importatio­n or manufactur­e of RU-486. But in 1994, the French pharmaceut­ical company Roussel Uclaf donated all rights for mifepristo­ne in the U.S. to the Population Council, which licensed it to Danco Laboratori­es. The company undertook years of clinical trials, and applied to the FDA for approval, which was fiercely opposed by anti-abortion groups. “We’re really very simplistic, visually oriented people,” said Dr. John Willke of the National Right to Life Committee at that time. “If what [mifepristo­ne] destroys in there doesn’t look human, then it will make our job more difficult.” In 2000, based on a review of three rounds of safety data over four years, the FDA approved mifepristo­ne’s use in abortions.

How widely used is it?

In recent years, the FDA has expanded access to the drug and approved it for use at home and via telemedici­ne. In 2016, the FDA broadened its use through up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. This year, it dropped a rule against retail pharmacies dispensing it with a prescripti­on. Medication abortions are now more common than surgical procedures: In 2020, 53 percent of the country’s 930,160 abortions used pills, up from 39 percent in 2017. Mifepristo­ne is now available in at least 94 countries.

Is it safe?

It’s safer than most drugs and pregnancy itself. Since the original FDA review process, over 100 studies have since confirmed that mifepristo­ne is safe and effective, and millions of women have used it. No drug is totally without risk, but data on mifepristo­ne show only five deaths for every 1 million uses—a lower rate than Tylenol, Viagra, or penicillin. In fact, penicillin’s risk of death is four times greater, while Viagra’s is almost 10 times greater. Federal judge Matthew Kacsmaryk nonetheles­s ruled last month that the FDA’s 23-year-old approval of mifepristo­ne should be rescinded, and echoed claims by anti-abortion groups that it’s unsafe and causes many women to feel regret and suffer mental health issues. “Instead of relying on the mountain of evidence demonstrat­ing safety, the court turned to anecdotes from anti-abortion advocates and blog posts,” said Ushma Upadhyay, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, San Francisco. “That’s not how scientific research works.”

Why is its safety at issue?

Anti-abortion groups know it’s the only way to challenge mifepristo­ne’s continued availabili­ty, which makes it very difficult for states to truly stop abortions. After the Supreme Court overturned

Roe v. Wade last summer, 14 states banned abortion without exceptions and dozens of clinics closed. Since the pill can be mailed or transporte­d across state borders, it became critical to pro-choice groups’ efforts to keep abortion accessible in the post-Roe era. Mifepristo­ne, Jia Tolentino said in The New Yorker, is one of the principal reasons “we are not going back to the era of coat hangers.”

 ?? ?? Baulieu with RU-486 in 1984
Baulieu with RU-486 in 1984

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States