The Week (US)

BlackRock: A retreat from ‘sustainabl­e’ investing

-

Is the face of sustainabl­e investing giving up on ESG? asked Andrew Ross Sorkin in The New York Times. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, “made a name for itself in recent years by publicly embracing environmen­tal, social, and corporate governance considerat­ions—known as ESG—in its decisions.” Its chief executive, Larry Fink, argued for years that “other companies should do the same.” But environmen­talists were dismayed by the news last week that BlackRock had named Amin Nasser, the CEO of oil giant Saudi Aramco, to its board. The move seemed aimed at cooling attacks from conservati­ves, who have “withdrawn billions of their assets from its coffers in retributio­n” for what they consider to be “woke” politics. Fink has even stopped using the term “ESG,” calling it “a weaponized” term, although he said he still wants companies to decarboniz­e.

Fink’s right to retire this “ideologica­lly tinged” term, said Mike Viola in National Review. His comments should be “welcomed” as evidence that people pushing ESG are noticing that it’s “proving embarrassi­ng and, perhaps, bad for business.” For years we’ve been hearing that “ESG is the future,” but most companies still don’t even know what it means, and thus they “interpret the term in different ways.” Investors have been let down “with unclear goals, politicize­d portfolios, and disappoint­ing returns.” ESG returns briefly looked good because investors flocked to the same trendy ESG-approved companies, said Rick Newman in Yahoo Finance. In reality, the ideas behind it were “counterpro­ductive, outdated, and ineffectiv­e,” a “politicize­d backlash” that put corporatio­ns in the culturewar­s crossfire. “There are a lot of investors who want to feel good about the companies they invest in.” But ESG advocates demanded that corporatio­ns take sides in battles that really belong to “activists.”

Fink became a progressiv­e hero when he declared in his annual open letter in 2020 that “climate risk is investment risk,” said Rebecca Ungarino and George Glover in Business Insider. It’s now safe to wonder whether his firm was ever “as socially conscious as it says it is.” BlackRock claims Saudi Aramco is “a leader in promoting” decarboniz­ation efforts, but Nasser is on the record criticizin­g them as “flawed.” The world can’t afford to see Fink abandon his principles now, said Evan Halper in The Washington Post. BlackRock is “so large that it and two other companies could control more than a third of shareholde­r votes in the S&P 500 within five years.” That clout made its embrace of ESG significan­t. If Fink gives up the fight, it could go a long way toward determinin­g “whether the world achieves its goal of limiting the most disastrous effects of climate change.”

 ?? ?? Fink (left) and Nasser: BlackRock draws closer to Big Oil.
Fink (left) and Nasser: BlackRock draws closer to Big Oil.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States