Times-Call (Longmont)

VIEWS FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY

-

The St. Louis PostDispat­ch on Democrats don’t have to face midterm disaster:

Election prognostic­ators increasing­ly predict Congress will fall to the GOP in this year’s midterms. The reasons have less to do with Republican policy proposals (those are scarce nationally these days) than with inflation, President Joe Biden’s low approval numbers and other factors that have the ruling party on the rocks. This is a good time to remind voters of what the GOP has done in the past and would likely do in the future with renewed congressio­nal control — and to implore Democrats to get their act together.

The consistent pattern is that the party in the presidency almost always loses congressio­nal seats in the midterms. Polls indicate that pattern will endure this year. The House is “about as good as gone for Democrats,” Politico predicts. The Senate outcome is less assured, in part because if disgraced Missouri exGov. Eric Greitens wins the state’s Republican Senate nomination, he could well lose a winnable seat for the party. But overall, prospects in that chamber, too, still lean to the GOP.

The main factor is which side gets its voters to the polls. Fivethirty­eight and other analysts predict a major midterm enthusiasm gap: the difference between mobilized conservati­ves who yearn to humiliate Biden by voting against Democrats, and frustrated liberals who aren’t in the mood to defend him and his party.

Democrats have provided plenty for liberals to be frustrated about, including their inability to deliver on promises like Biden’s “Build Back Better” package for climate reform and social spending, his botched withdrawal from Afghanista­n, and of course the current rise in inflation. The latter is largely the result of issues that predate Biden, like current oil shortages due to private industry still ramping back up from the pandemic. But in the real world, presidents and their parties get the blame when prices go up.

Democratic successes, though, are significan­t, including Biden’s historic infrastruc­ture package, vast improvemen­t over his predecesso­r’s handling of the pandemic, near-record employment, and a steady hand in dealing with the Russia-ukraine war. (How former President Donald Trump might have dealt with that fraught, potentiall­y apocalypti­c challenge is the stuff of nightmares.)

Biden has never been a smooth communicat­or, and Democrats as a whole have never worked and played well together. They obscure their own successes with these shortcomin­gs. They should do a better job of reminding the nation what has been accomplish­ed — and what stands to be lost.

While the more savvy Republican­s don’t say it, the party has signaled clearly that likely results of a GOP congressio­nal takeover (especially if they add the presidency in 2024) include all-out assaults on both abortion rights and voting rights. Liberals, moderates and conservati­ves who recognize the dangers of that agenda don’t have to blindly watch history repeat itself this November. The New York Daily News on passing the SALT — a bad Trump tax provision

It was Dec. 20, 2017, when both houses of Congress passed, with Republican votes only, a $10,000 limit on deducting state and local taxes. Donald Trump signed it into law two days later and it took effect Jan. 1. Democrats griped, but they had lost the 2016 election and lost the legislativ­e fight.

By the end of January, New York, New Jersey and Connecticu­t announced they’d sue, and they finally filed their lawsuit in July, joined by Maryland. It was a stinker of a suit by Andrew Cuomo and company, as we said at the outset. Yes, capping this SALT deduction was unfair and politicall­y motivated to target high-tax, Democratic-controlled states, but that’s politics and it’s not against the Constituti­on, as was alleged. The Founders put nothing into the 10th Amendment against winners and losers and neither did the progressiv­es in the 16th Amendment empowering Congress to tax incomes, a change ratified in 1913.

The case was correctly shot down by a Manhattan federal judge the next year and his decision was upheld by a panel of three Manhattan federal appeals judges last fall, finding that Congress had long tinkered with the deductibil­ity of state and local taxes on sales, property, income and even gasoline. The conclusion to the legal matter came a few days ago, appropriat­ely, or ironically, on Tax Day, when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the states’ appeal.

So that is that in the courts. But Congress can and still should right the wrong done nearly five years ago — not by fully reinstatin­g the SALT deduction, which would disproport­ionately aid the wealthiest Americans, but by raising the cap and possibly meanstesti­ng the benefit.

President Joe Biden, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Speaker Nancy Pelosi all have decried the GOP’S SALT cap and vowed to undo it. The House did raise the cap to $80,000, but the Senate hasn’t moved and time is running short.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States