Times-Herald (Vallejo)

Dems hoping Bolton will ruin Trump. Good luck with that

- Marc Thiessen — Twitter, @marcthiess­en.

WASHINGTON >> Consider the irony: Senate Democrats are hoping that former national security adviser John Bolton —

yes, John Bolton — will provide them with the bombshell testimony that brings down President Trump. In other words, they have pinned their hopes on a man they have vilified for years, and whose national security career they sought to destroy. Good luck with that.

Democrats want Bolton to take the stand in Trump’s impeachmen­t trial because during the House inquiry National Security Council official Fiona Hill testified that Bolton was “furious” when he learned about a shadow operation in Ukraine, headed by Trump’s personal attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, that involved temporaril­y withholdin­g U.S. military aid and pressing the government to investigat­e the business dealings of former vice president

Joe Biden’s son Hunter. Hill said Bolton described Giuliani as a “hand grenade,” told her to bring her concerns about the matter to White House lawyers and declared that he didn’t want any part of “whatever drug deal” was afoot in Ukraine.

No doubt that is all true. Bolton is a foreign policy profession­al. But none of this means that Bolton believes Trump committed an impeachabl­e offense. He may very well believe Trump’s decision to withhold lethal aide to Ukraine, and to raise Hunter Biden with

Ukraine’s president, was wrong. (If so, he’d be correct). But not every bad decision a president makes is impeachabl­e. I’ll bet Bolton considers President Barack Obama’s decision to release five senior Taliban leaders from Guantanamo Bay in exchange for U.S. Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl — an act that the Government Accountabi­lity Office found was illegal — worse than a “drug deal.” Yet no Democrats called for Obama’s impeachmen­t over it.

Some have speculated that Bolton may be motivated to testify against Trump because of his acrimoniou­s exit from the White House and his disagreeme­nt with some of Trump’s foreign policy decisions. Please. Whatever he thinks of the way Trump treated him, Bolton has been treated far worse by Democrats.

Have they forgotten how they tried to ruin his profession­al reputation and filibuster­ed his nomination to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, forcing President George W. Bush to install him in the post temporaril­y with a recess appointmen­t? Or how, when Trump appointed Bolton as national security adviser, Democrats excoriated Bolton for being, as Sen. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., called him, “a grave danger to the American people”?

But if Bolton’s testimony were so critical to their case, House Democrats should have subpoenaed him to testify in their impeachmen­t inquiry and then allowed the courts to adjudicate Trump’s invocation of executive privilege. Instead, they artificial­ly rushed their half-baked impeachmen­t inquiry to close it out before Christmas and then charged Trump with obstructio­n of Congress for appealing to the third equal branch of government — the judiciary — as is his constituti­onal right. In so doing, Democrats forfeited the high ground. If their case is deficient, they have no one to blame but themselves.

Regardless of whether and how Bolton testifies, Trump is going to be acquitted. The fact that Democrats are counting on Bolton to be the hero who rescues the doomed efforts by Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to end Trump’s presidency shows how weak their case really is.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States