Times-Herald (Vallejo)

Oregon posts workplace outbreaks weekly

California has no such plan

- By Laurence Du Sault

California and Oregon were lauded for their early response to the pandemic, with swift and broad shutdowns aimed at slowing the spread of coronaviru­s.

In reopening their economies, both states imposed stringent requiremen­ts for masks and face coverings.

But eight months into the public health crisis, the neighborin­g states have made starkly different choices on tracking and reporting workplace outbreaks — decisions that shape how much the public knows about the spread of coronaviru­s as hotspots appear at meat- packing plants, stadium constructi­on sites, warehouses and other essential worksites.

Since May, Oregon has used a centralize­d tracking system, which has enabled health officials there to release weekly reports that list the names and addresses of every known business with at least 30 employees where five or more positive COVID-19 cases are identified. For outbreaks of more than 20, the state issues special daily reports.

California, in contrast, doesn’t post workplace outbreaks. The state lets its 58 counties handle coronaviru­s data, with wide variety in how each county tracks and reports workplace outbreaks.

The distinctio­n has workers and public health experts worried.

“It’s fundamenta­l data that should be readily available,” said Dr. Melissa Perry, epidemiolo­gist and chair of the Environmen­tal and Occupation­al Health department at George Washington University.

Throughout the pandemic, the Golden State has advised, but did not mandate, that employers notify workers of positive cases among employees. This means millions of workers in the fifth-largest economy in the world receive less informatio­n than they could about whether it’s safe to go to work. It also means low-wage essential workers carry greater risks: A joint investigat­ion by CalMatters and The Salinas California­n for the California Divide revealed hundreds of unreported outbreaks among guest farmworker­s throughout California this summer.

While business groups say it’s not productive to publicly shame companies, public health experts say posting workplace outbreaks would be helpful in controllin­g the virus, as pandemicfa­tigued residents seek to return to school and work. More than 18,000 California­ns have died from the virus with Latino and Black people infected at a significan­tly higher rate than white and Asian people. Such informatio­n, experts say, may improve scientific tracking and enable targeted responses amid a third wave of outbreaks.

What Oregonians know but California­ns don’t

Like most states, California isn’t taking the extra step to post workplace outbreaks. Only a few states, including Oregon, Arkansas, New Mexico and Colorado, do disclose where workers have contracted the virus. Iowa will disclose outbreaks if 10% of a business’ employees test positive.

In Oregon, health officials made an early pivot with public support.

State health officials came under heavy criticism last spring in choosing not to disclose two outbreaks at Townsend Farms, a Portland-based fruit company. On May 28, the department made an administra­tive decision to track outbreaks statewide using lab results and data from healthcare providers. Oregon posts reports that include workplace outbreaks along with those in schools, child care facilities and senior living and care facilities.

“There was a demand for transparen­cy,” said Oregon Health Authority director Patrick Allen. “We had to shift.”

Today, Oregonians know nearly as much as their public health officials about the number of workers who have died or been infected as a result of workplace exposures. It’s 37 deaths and 8,605 cases.

California­ns don’t know. “It immediatel­y paints a patchwork quilt picture of data,” said Perry, the George Washington University epidemiolo­gist. “Very incomplete, very selective.”

The two states are very different in size and economy. Oregon has just over a tenth of California’s population, which accounts in part for the state’s low infection rate. But the state’s coronaviru­s case rate is still 1,116 per 100,000, the sixth lowest rate in the country. California’s rate is more than double that, according to data analyzed by this news organizati­on.

Though it’s difficult to know if Oregon’s reporting contribute­d to a lower fatality rate, officials there believe sharing informatio­n has helped.

California resists naming and shaming

California’s reluctance was on display in Sacramento this legislativ­e cycle as lawmakers pushed for greater transparen­cy. A bill signed in September by Gov. Gavin Newsom aims to give workers timely notice, but a key requiremen­t to disclose worksite outbreaks to the public got stripped out of the final draft.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States