Times-Herald (Vallejo)

US agencies temporaril­y barred from enforcing LGBTQ guidance

- By Mark Gillispie

A judge in Tennessee has temporaril­y barred two federal agencies from enforcing directives issued by President Joe Biden's administra­tion that extended protection­s for LGBTQ people in schools and workplaces.

U.S. District Judge Charles Atchley Jr. in an order on Friday ruled for the 20 state attorneys general who sued last August claiming the Biden administra­tion directives infringe on states' right to enact laws that, for example, prevent students from participat­ing in sports based on their gender identity or requiring schools and businesses to provide bathrooms and showers to accommodat­e transgende­r people.

Atchley, appointed by President Donald Trump in 2020, agreed with the attorneys generals' argument and issued a temporary injunction that prevents the agencies from applying that guidance on LGBTQ discrimina­tion until the matter can be resolved by courts.

“As demonstrat­ed above, the harm alleged by Plaintiff States is already occurring — their sovereign power to enforce their own legal code is hampered by the issuance of Defendants' guidance and they face substantia­l pressure to change their state laws as a result,” Atchley wrote.

The attorneys general are from Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississipp­i, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee and West Virginia.

The directives regarding discrimina­tion based on sexual orientatio­n was issued by the U.S. Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunit­y

Commission in June following a landmark civil rights decision by U.S. Supreme Court in 2020 that, under a provision called Title VII, protects gay, lesbian and transgende­r people from discrimina­tion in the workplace.

The Department of Education guidance from June 2021 said discrimina­tion based on a student's sexual orientatio­n or gender identity would be treated as a violation of Title IX, the 1972 federal law that protects sex discrimina­tion in education.

The Equal Employment Opportunit­y Commission released guidance that month about what could constitute discrimina­tion against LGBTQ people and advised the public about how to file a complaint.

With its guidance, the Biden administra­tion in part took a stand against laws and proposals in a growing number of states that aim to forbid transgende­r girls from participat­ing on female sports teams. The state attorneys general contend that the authority over such policies “properly belongs to Congress, the States, and the people.”

The education policy carried the possibilit­y of federal sanctions against schools and colleges that fail to protect gay and transgende­r students.

The attorneys general argued that a delaying a legal review of the directives would “cause them significan­t hardship, as Defendants would be allowed to use the `fear of future sanctions' to force `immediate compliance' with the challenged guidance,” Atchley wrote.

“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have shown a credible threat of enforcemen­t,” Atchley wrote. “Plaintiffs highlight that private litigants are relying on Defendants' guidance to challenge Plaintiffs' state laws.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States