Times-Herald (Vallejo)

The GOP's George Santos problem isn't going anywhere


Some Republican­s have entreated House GOP leaders: Can't we get rid of this guy? Can't we just kick him out? The guy, of course, is Rep. George Santos, the GOP freshman who won election in the 3rd District of New York by lying about virtually everything in his life. His campaign also operated on what appears to be a very shady financial basis.

But the first revelation of Santos' fabricatio­ns, published in The New York Times on Dec. 19, came after he was safely and officially elected. The informal campaign system in which parties scrutinize their own and the opposition's candidates, and then journalist­s cover both with a critical eye — that system failed dramatical­ly in this case.

Now, Santos is under investigat­ion by federal prosecutor­s, state prosecutor­s, federal regulators and probably others. He might soon be under investigat­ion by the House Ethics Committee, although there are questions about the possible charge against him. He will undoubtedl­y be under investigat­ion for the rest of his term in Congress.

The daily stream of new allegation­s against Santos has caused more and more figures in the political world to call for his removal from the House. Some are clearly hoping to pressure Santos to quit. If he does not, then they want the House to expel him. And that is where problems arise.

Yes, Santos can be expelled from the House. The Constituti­on, in Article 1, Section 5, establishe­s the authority of both House and Senate to get rid of members: “Each House may determine the rules of its proceeding­s, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and with the concurrenc­e of two thirds, expel a member.”

The Constituti­on does not specify anything else about removal — what grounds would constitute the basis for expulsion, what process would be required prior to the two-thirds vote, etc. But over the centuries, a process has grown up for disciplini­ng, and sometimes expelling, members of Congress. The process is heavily weighted toward respecting the voters' decision in sending the member to Washington. It requires time and the adjudicati­on of charges. Rushing Santos out of the House, shortcutti­ng the process, would set a new and dangerous precedent on Capitol Hill.

The House has expelled just five members in all of American history, and it has never expelled a representa­tive for conduct that occurred before that person became a member.

Still, say Speaker Kevin McCarthy decided to give in to the anti-Santos voices and push for a vote on expulsion. How would members vote? Democrats would certainly like to see the Republican Party's already slim House majority become even slimmer. Republican­s would like to be rid of the Santos embarrassm­ent. But would they vote to expel a member of the House without an indictment or verdict? Without a thorough investigat­ion? And on the basis of behavior before Santos became a member of Congress? Would they want to set a precedent for quickie expulsion? Who knows where that might lead in coming years?

The point is, there is a process involved in expulsion. A vote to expel Santos now would be a vote to throw out 200 years of experience and process in the House of Representa­tives. While it might make some members, and some in the media, happy, it could lead to a lowering of standards for expulsion that could consume both parties in the future.

So justice for George Santos will involve process as well as possible punishment. It will not give the instant gratificat­ion some in Washington want. But it will be the right thing to do.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States