Times-Herald (Vallejo)

Haley is right about mess that is Trump

- — Steven Roberts can be contacted by email at stevecokie@gmail.com.

Nikki Haley keeps arguing that the country cannot afford the chaos and foolishnes­s that surround Donald Trump. And Trump keeps proving her right.

Last October, President Biden asked Congress to approve $61 billion in new security aid for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel. Republican­s insisted that any deal had to be combined with tough new restrictio­ns along the southern border, and a bipartisan group of senators has been negotiatin­g in good faith to produce a compromise proposal.

This is exactly the way Congress should work and seldom does — coming together across party lines to solve a real problem. But enter Trump, who is demanding that Republican­s reject the deal that they themselves were demanding just a few months ago.

Not only that — he's objecting for clear and crass motives. He wants to use the border issue against Biden next fall and fears a deal would be “another gift” to his opponent. “They need it politicall­y,” he admits.

“It is interestin­g,” the lead Republican negotiator, Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma, told

Fox News. “Republican­s, four months ago … locked arms together and said, `We're not going to give money for this. We want a change in law. … A few months later, when we're finally getting to the end, they're like, `Oh, just kidding, I actually don't want a change in law because it's a presidenti­al election year.'”

This is chaos compounded, taken to a whole new level, and some reasonable Republican­s are willing to say it. Here's Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina on NBC: “I didn't come here to have the president as a boss or a candidate as a boss. I came here to pass good, solid policy. It is immoral for me to think you looked the other way because you think this is the linchpin for President Trump to win.”

And here's Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah: “I think the border is a very important issue for Donald Trump. And the fact that he would communicat­e to Republican senators and congresspe­ople that he doesn't want us to solve the border problem because he wants to blame Biden for it is really appalling.”

The implicatio­ns go far beyond Trump's “appalling” immorality. This whole episode shows that the ex-president and his toadies totally misunderst­and — or don't want to understand — the legislativ­e process.

Trump states that he would not support any package on immigratio­n “unless we get EVERYTHING.” (The capital letters are his.) Now, no one ever gets everything they want in a legislativ­e compromise, especially when power is divided between the parties.

But Trumpists don't care because they're not interested in passing the “good, solid policy” Tillis describes. They don't govern, they perform. They focus on ratings, not records. They don't measure success in problems solved, but in tweets posted, interviews given, attention generated. Trumpists argue that by rejecting the compromise, they can get a better deal if and when they retake the White House, but that is a total fallacy. Democrats have a powerful incentive to bargain now — Biden's vast vulnerabil­ity on the border issue — and if Trump wins, that motive disappears. The Senate's No. 2 Republican, John Thune of South Dakota, says flatly there's “absolutely no way” for President Trump to get a deal this good.

Even from a pure political perspectiv­e, Trump could be making a major miscalcula­tion. The Wall Street Journal editorial board argues, “giving up on a border security bill would be a self-inflicted GOP wound” and explains: “President Biden would claim, with cause, that Republican­s want border chaos as an election issue rather than solving the problem. Voter anger may over time move from Mr. Biden to the GOP, and the public will have a point.”

Lost in all of this political posturing is the fate of the aid package for Ukraine and Israel, which, as Republican leader Mitch McConnell puts it, advances a “cold, hard American interest.” Republican­s who are blocking the border bill could pay a second political price: blame for underminin­g Ukraine's ability to resist Russia's invasion.

“This won't take decades to regret,” warns Tillis. “This will be in a matter of years and so people who choose to ultimately exit Ukraine if they are successful — for as long as I am breathing — I will remind them of the consequenc­es I am convinced we will have to live through.”

Reality-based Republican­s like Tillis know that Haley is absolutely right, that more Trump means more tantrums, tirades and trouble. But most of them remain too cowardly to say so.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States