Times-Herald (Vallejo)

Prosecutor leaves Trump Georgia election case after relationsh­ip with DA

- By Kate Brumback and Alanna Durkin Richer

ATLANTA >> A special prosecutor who had a romantic relationsh­ip with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis formally withdrew Friday from the Georgia election interferen­ce case against Donald Trump after a judge ruled he had to leave or Willis couldn't continue to pursue the charges.

Attorney Nathan Wade's resignatio­n allows Willis to remain on the most sprawling of four criminal cases against the presumptiv­e Republican nominee in the 2024 presidenti­al election.

But the long-term damage to the public perception of the prosecutio­n remains unclear, particular­ly in light of Trump's relentless barrage of attacks on the pair who pledged to hold Trump accountabl­e but found their own actions under a public microscope.

Wade offered his resignatio­n in a letter to Willis, saying he was doing so “in the interest of democracy, in dedication to the American public and to move this case forward as quickly as possible.”

“I am sure that the case, and the team, will be in good hands moving forward and justice will be served,” Wade wrote.

Willis compliment­ed Wade's “profession­alism and dignity” in a letter accepting his resignatio­n, effective immediatel­y. She said he had endured threats against himself and his family, as well as “unjustifie­d attacks” in the media and in court on his reputation as a lawyer.

“I will always remember — and will remind everyone — that you were brave enough to step forward and take on the investigat­ion and prosecutio­n of the allegation­s that the defendants in this case engaged in a conspiracy to overturn Georgia's 2020 Presidenti­al Election,” Willis wrote.

Trump's team felt differentl­y.

An attorney for the former president said they respected the court's decision but believe the judge “did not afford appropriat­e significan­ce to the prosecutor­ial misconduct of Willis and Wade.”

“We will use all legal options available as we continue to fight to end this case, which should never have been brought in the first place,” Trump attorney Steve Sadow said.

Defense attorneys could try to appeal the ruling, but they would need the judge's permission to do so.

The resignatio­n came hours after Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee said Wade had to be removed or Willis must step aside from the case. McAfee did not find that Willis' relationsh­ip with Wade amounted to a conflict of interest but said the allegation­s created an “appearance of impropriet­y” that infected the prosecutio­n team.

“As the case moves forward, reasonable members of the public could easily be left to wonder whether the financial exchanges have continued resulting in some form of benefit to the District Attorney, or even whether the romantic relationsh­ip has resumed,” the judge wrote.

“Put differentl­y, an outsider could reasonably think that the District Attorney is not exercising her independen­t profession­al judgment totally free of any compromisi­ng influences. As long as Wade remains on the case, this unnecessar­y perception will persist.”

Friday's extraordin­ary developmen­ts underscore­d the extent to which the case that began with allegation­s that a former president tried to undermine the will of the people who voted him out of the White House had become consumed by talk of the love lives of its top prosecutor­s. In accepting Wade's resignatio­n, Willis made clear her determinat­ion to turn the page from weeks of embarrassi­ng headlines about romantic getaways, sex and stashes of cash that have dominated the coverage of the case.

Willis hired Wade in 2021 to lead the team to investigat­e and ultimately prosecute Trump and 18 others on charges that they illegally tried to overturn his narrow loss to Democrat Joe Biden in Georgia in 2020. The case uses a statute normally associated with mobsters to accuse the former president, lawyers and other aides of a “criminal enterprise” to keep him in power.

Trump, the Republican­s' presumptiv­e presidenti­al nominee for 2024, has denied doing anything wrong and pleaded not guilty.

Willis and Wade testified at a hearing last month that they had engaged in a romantic relationsh­ip, but they rejected the idea that Willis improperly benefited from it, as lawyers for Trump and some of his codefendan­ts alleged. Willis and Wade insisted they didn't begin dating until after he became special prosecutor, though a former friend and employee of Willis' testified that she saw the pair hugging and kissing before he was hired.

Willis and Wade said the relationsh­ip ended in the summer of 2023. They both said that Willis either paid for things herself or used cash to reimburse Wade for travel expenses.

McAfee wrote that there was insufficie­nt evidence that Willis had a personal stake in the prosecutio­n. And he said he was unable to “conclusive­ly establish by a prepondera­nce of the evidence” whether Willis and Wade began dating before or after he was hired as special prosecutor.

“However, an odor of mendacity remains,” the judge wrote. He said “reasonable questions” about whether Willis and Wade testified truthfully about the timing of their relationsh­ip “further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriet­y and the need to make proportion­al efforts to cure it.”

Even so, he said, dismissal of the case was not the appropriat­e remedy to “adequately dissipate the financial cloud of impropriet­y and potential untruthful­ness found here.”

An attorney for co-defendant Michael Roman was the first to ask McAfee to dismiss the indictment and prevent Willis and Wade and their offices from continuing to prosecute the case. The attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, alleged that Willis paid Wade large sums for his work and then improperly benefited from the prosecutio­n of the case when Wade used his earnings to pay for vacations for the two of them.

Merchant said in a statement Friday that while Roman's team maintains that the judge should have disqualifi­ed Willis' office entirely, the judge clearly agreed with the defense that there is a “risk to the future of this case” if Willis “doesn't quickly work to cure her conflict.”

 ?? ?? Special prosecutor Nathan Wade looks on during a hearing on the Georgia election interferen­ce case March 1in Atlanta.
Special prosecutor Nathan Wade looks on during a hearing on the Georgia election interferen­ce case March 1in Atlanta.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States