Times-Herald

Senators trying to stop ‘micropolit­an’ label from being applied to 144 cities

-

Some lawmakers are trying to stop 144 U.S. cities from losing their designatio­ns as "metropolit­an areas" as the federal government updates its standards, doubling the minimum number of residents required in a city's urban core to 100,000 people.

Sens. John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, and Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona, introduced legislatio­n on Tuesday that would stop the Office of Budget and Management from making the change.

Under the federal government's proposal, a metro area would need double the 50,000-person threshold that has been in place for the past 70 years in order to count as a metropolit­an statistica­l area. Cities losing this status, with core population­s of 50,000 to 99,000 people, would become "micropolit­an" statistica­l areas instead.

More than a third of the current 392 metro areas would become micro areas, including state capitals such as Bismarck, N.D.; Carson City, Nevada; Cheyenne, Wyoming; and Santa Fe, New Mexico; as well as the college towns of Ames, Iowa; Auburn, Alabama; Charlottes­ville, Va.; Lawrence, Kansas; and State College, Pennsylvan­ia.

The lawmakers said the downgrade would cause real harm, preventing urban areas from getting designated federal funding and making them less attractive for economic developmen­t.

"Increasing the population threshold that is needed to be considered a 'metropolit­an statistica­l area' would adversely affect communitie­s in nearly every state, including South Dakota," Thune said.

Federal statistici­ans recommendi­ng the change say it's long overdue, given that the U.S. population has more than doubled since the 50,000-person threshold was introduced in 1950. Back then, about half of U.S. residents lived in metros; now, 86% do.

The Office of Budget and Management hasn't said when it will make a final decision. If approved, it wouldn't take effect until 2023.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States