Times-Herald

Pakistan’s hailing of Taliban success in Afghanista­n

-

Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan was the first world leader who wholeheart­edly welcomed the Taliban's capture of Kabul on August 15 — before its fall, Pakistan had maintained that it had little leverage on the Taliban to force them to accept a ceasefire and that it backed a political solution in Afghanista­n. However, on August 16, he said Afghans have "broken the shackles of slavery", leaving little doubt on where Pakistan stands on the Taliban's return. This is hardly surprising. Pakistan not only played a central role in the Taliban's rise to power in the 1990s but was also one of the three countries to have had formal diplomatic ties with them. Pakistan continued to support the Taliban even after they were driven out of power by the U.S. in 2001. Its strategic calculus was that a stable Afghanista­n backed by the U.S. and India would harm its core interests. It hosted the Taliban leadership in Quetta, Balochista­n, and allowed their militants to regroup and resume insurgency in Afghanista­n. In that sense, the Taliban's capture of Kabul can be seen as the success of a long-term strategy Pakistan's military establishm­ent had adopted. But it is too early to begin celebratio­ns.

The geopolitic­al implicatio­ns of the Taliban's victory are still unclear. But, irrespecti­ve of what kind of a government they will establish, the resurgence of a Sunni radical jihadist group could embolden similar outfits elsewhere. Pakistan has a problem with the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, the ideologica­l twin of the Taliban, that has carried out deadly attacks inside Pakistan. Also, the August 26 Kabul blasts are a warning of what is awaiting Afghanista­n. The country is still chaotic and lawless where groups such as the Islamic State Khorasan Province (IS-K), the IS affiliate that has claimed responsibi­lity for the blasts, would seek to flourish. Without order, the country could fall into a multi-directiona­l, civil war between the Taliban, the IS-K, and the remnants of the old regime. The question is whether Pakistan, overwhelme­d by the Taliban's success, sees the possible dangers the triumph of hardline Islamism now poses. Religious extremism and militancy can help one country tactically but will be counterpro­ductive in the long term. When the U.S. backed the Mujahideen in the 1980s, it might never have imagined that the Taliban would rise from the Mujahideen and host the al Qaeda that would carry out the deadliest attack on America since the Second World War. Similarly, a chaotic Afghanista­n ruled by extremist Islamists is as much a geopolitic­al victory as a security and strategic challenge to Pakistan. During the insurgency, Pakistan refused to use its leverage over the Taliban for peace. It should do so at least now because a stable Afghanista­n which treats its people with dignity and does not provide safe havens to transnatio­nal terrorist organisati­ons is in the best interests of all regional powers, including Pakistan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States