Times-Herald

The U.N. and Afghan women

-

President Biden's first speech as Commander in Chief to the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday was full of the high-minded internatio­nalist sentiment that defines his rhetoric. If only those words reflected the reality of the world he and America will have to navigate over the next four years.

"We've ended 20 years of conflict in Afghanista­n," Mr. Biden averred. "And as we close this period of relentless war, we're opening a new era of relentless diplomacy; of using the power of our developmen­t aid to invest in new ways of lifting people around the world, of renewing and defending democracy."

Mr. Biden told the assembled leaders what they wanted to hear: America will lash itself to the idealistic offices of the U.N., to the World Health Organizati­on, to the Human Rights Council, and even to a New Global Health Threat Council. Aren't pandemic threats the WHO's job? Well, you can never have too many internatio­nal bureaucrac­ies.

Nowhere was Mr. Biden's rhetoric more divorced from reality than on women and Afghanista­n. In his speech he highlighte­d "the expectatio­ns to which we will hold the Taliban when it comes to respecting universal human rights. We all must advocate for women— the rights of women and girls to use their full talents to contribute economical­ly, politicall­y, and socially."

Meanwhile in Kabul, the Associated Press reports: "The Taliban expanded their interim Cabinet by naming more ministers and deputies on Tuesday, but failed to appoint any women, doubling down on a hard-line course."

On Sept. 8, Secretary of State Antony Blinken noted that "despite professing that a new government would be inclusive," the Taliban's list "consists exclusivel­y of individual­s who are members of the Taliban or their close associates, and no women."

This weekend the Taliban announced that girls would not be allowed to return to school. All signs so far in Kabul are that the Islamist group is reverting to the same medieval approach to girls and women it enforced the last time it controlled the country.

Perhaps the Administra­tion thinks its well-meaning gender appeals can't hurt. But the dissonance between the Administra­tion's words and its actions in abandoning Afghanista­n to the Taliban discredits its liberal humanitari­an project. No single act by an American President has done more harm to more women than Mr. Biden's willy-nilly withdrawal from Afghanista­n. Noble but feckless exhortatio­ns at Turtle Bay can't make up for that reality.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States