Times-Herald

Top generals, Senate hearing and Afghanista­n

-

President Biden hopes the political fallout from his botched Afghanista­n withdrawal will fade quickly, but Tuesday's Senate hearing with the secretary of Defense and two top generals doesn't cast his decisions in a better light.

The hearing underscore­d that the President acted against the advice of the military in yanking the residual U.S. force from the country. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and Gen. Kenneth McKenzie both made clear in their testimony that they recommende­d that about 2,500 U.S. troops stay in Afghanista­n to delay a Taliban takeover.

That's not what Mr. Biden said he was told. Asked in an ABC News interview days after the August fall of Kabul if his military advisers urged him to maintain America's small footprint in the country, Mr. Biden said, "No one said that to me that I can recall."

The scandal isn't that the President ignored military advice — he's the decision-maker. It's his refusal to own his decision. Mr. Biden wants political credit for ending America's involvemen­t in Afghanista­n, but he's not willing to take the political risk of admitting he overruled the brass in the process.

The generals also undercut Mr. Biden's spin about their advice as the chaotic withdrawal was underway. He said the generals unanimousl­y supported his Aug. 31 deadline for the departure of U.S. troops. But as Gen. Milley confirmed in questionin­g by Sen. Tom Cotton, that advice was given on Aug. 25 — 10 days after the fall of Kabul to the Taliban.

Waiting that long essentiall­y presented the generals with a fait accompli, since the Taliban were already entrenched in Kabul. It didn't have to unfold that way. Once it became clear Kabul was going to fall in mid-August, the U.S. could have told the Taliban that it was going to secure a wide perimeter around the Kabul airport and control the city until the withdrawal of Americans and Afghan allies was complete.

That would have allowed a more orderly departure, and potentiall­y less loss of life, even if it meant extending the Aug. 31 deadline. But Mr. Biden wanted out immediatel­y, so he cast another rotten tactical decision as the result of military advice rather than his own willfulnes­s.

The Administra­tion's sunny assurances about the impact of the withdrawal on U.S. national security were also undercut by the brass. When Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona asked Gen. McKenzie, "are you confident that we can deny organizati­ons like al Qaeda and ISIS the ability to use Afghanista­n as a launchpad for terrorist activity?" the general said, "I would not say I am confident."

Gen. Milley similarly called the outcome in Afghanista­n a "strategic failure" as "the enemy is in charge in Kabul" — a break in tone for an Administra­tion that has been casting the Taliban as a potential partner. He still insisted it was a "logistical success" — a dubious designatio­n of an operation that, despite an impressive number of flights from Kabul, saw 13 U.S. deaths and a mistaken drone strike that killed 10 Afghan civilians, including seven children.

Gen. Milley was also in the hot seat for the reports of his actions late in the Trump years as relayed in a book by journalist­s Bob Woodward and Robert Costa. The book paints a picture of a general freelancin­g on national security during and after the 2020 election, reviewing nuclear protocols and calling his Chinese counterpar­t to say he'd warn him if President Trump started a war.

Gen. Milley confirmed he spoke with Mr. Woodward, as well as other journalist­s writing books about the last days of the Trump Administra­tion. Yet he said his communicat­ions with China were standard practice, and he wouldn't say whether his portrayal in the books was accurate as he hadn't read them.

That's a dodge. Gen. Milley has surely seen the Washington Post report on the book that portrays him as undertakin­g extraordin­ary efforts to circumvent a President. Even if that portrayal was sensationa­lized by the authors — as we've warned might be the case — it has damaged Americans' perception of civilian control over the military.

Yet Gen. Milley didn't take responsibi­lity for that entirely predictabl­e outcome any more than Mr. Biden has the consequenc­es of his Afghanista­n retreat. The Afghan withdrawal is the greatest U.S. foreign-policy humiliatio­n in decades. The damage is made worse by the failure of accountabi­lity, starting with the Commander in Chief.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States