Times-Herald

Next battle over access to abortion will focus on pills

-

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — It took two trips over state lines, navigating icy roads and a patchwork of state laws, for a 32year-old South Dakota woman to get abortion pills last year.

For abortion-seekers like her, such journeys, along with pills sent through the mail, will grow in importance if the Supreme Court follows through with its leaked draft opinion that would overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade decision and allow individual states to ban the procedure. The woman, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because she was concerned for her family's safety, said the abortion pills allowed her to end an unexpected and highrisk pregnancy and remain devoted to her two children.

But anti-abortion activists and politician­s say those cross-border trips, remote doctors' consultati­ons and pill deliveries are what they will try to stop next.

"Medication abortion will be where access to abortion is decided," said Mary Ziegler, a professor at Florida State University College of Law who specialize­s in reproducti­ve rights. "That's going to be the battlegrou­nd that decides how enforceabl­e abortion bans are."

Use of abortion pills has been rising in the U.S. since 2000 when the Food and Drug Administra­tion approved mifepristo­ne — the main drug used in medication abortions. More than half of U.S. abortions are now done with pills, rather than surgery, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights.

The FDA last year lifted a longstandi­ng requiremen­t that women pick up abortion pills in person. Mail delivery is also now allowed nationwide.

Those moves have spurred online services that offer informatio­n on getting abortion pills and consultati­ons to get a prescripti­on. After the woman in South Dakota found that the state's only abortion clinic could not schedule her in time for a medication abortion, she found an online service, called Just The Pill, that advised her to drive across to Minnesota for a phone consultati­on with a doctor. A week later, she came back to Minnesota for the pills.

She took the first one almost immediatel­y in her car, then cried as she drove home.

"I felt like I lost a pregnancy," she said. "I love my husband and I love my children and I knew exactly what I had to say goodbye to and that was a really horrible thing to have to do."

South Dakota is among several states, including Texas, Kentucky, Arkansas, Ohio, Tennessee and Oklahoma, where Republican­s have moved to restrict access to abortion pills in recent months. South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem said additional, in-person visits for the pills and a ban on them being sent through the mail are needed to protect women and save "unborn children." A total of 19 states require a medical clinician to be physically present when abortion pills are given to a patient.

Besides crossing state lines, women can also turn to internatio­nally-based online pharmacies, said Greer Donley, a professor specializi­ng in reproducti­ve health care at the University of Pittsburgh Law School. Some women also are having prescribed pills forwarded through states without restrictio­ns.

"It allows for someone to have an abortion without a direct role of a provider. It's going to be much harder for states to control abortion access," she said, adding, "The question is how is it going to be enforced?"

Sue Leibel, the state policy director for Susan B. Anthony List, a prominent organizati­on opposed to abortion, acknowledg­ed it's an issue that "has crept up" on Republican state lawmakers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States