Times Standard (Eureka)

Science-based juvenile justice offers new hope

- By Stephanie James Special to CalMatters Stephanie James is president of the Chief Probation Officers of California, sjames@sjgov.org. She wrote this commentary for CalMatters.

California’s juvenile justice system has evolved as we have learned more about brain developmen­t, the effects of adverse childhood experience­s and social, emotional, and mental health needs of our young people.

I have worked with San Joaquin County probation for 25 years and served as chief since 2012. In that time, I have spent time with thousands of youths, supervisin­g a caseload and being the Superinten­dent of Juvenile and Camp Peterson.

When I was the superinten­dent, I learned in great detail about the youth we were serving. It was painfully obvious to me that they experience­d challenges and trauma that my own children had never known, and that they needed counseling and support services that would help them through those challenges.

Since 2007, California’s juvenile justice system, led by local probation department­s, has successful­ly decreased juvenile detention rates by 60% and juvenile arrest rates by 73%. We have safely treated and supervised 90% of youth in the justice system in the community, and we have diverted nearly 67% of youth out of the justice system.

This does not account for significan­t numbers of young people who never touch the system thanks to early interventi­on, prevention, and deflection efforts delivered by probation and other partners in the community.

What we know today from a growing body of brain science research is that the brain is not fully developed until the age of 25. Teenagers, whether they are 16 or 19, have trouble with impulse control and poor decision-making skills.

Those issues are made worse by trauma endured as small children which most of the youth served by the justice system experience far before they exhibit behavior that warrants a public safety response.

In 2016, the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management at the Harvard Kennedy School reported that “when comparing youth who were prosecuted in the adult system to those retained in the juvenile system, the former had a 34% to 77% greater likelihood of being re-arrested for a crime. They were also more likely to be re-arrested for a more violent crime than those exiting the juvenile system.”

Such research makes clear that our work is not done.

That is why the Chief Probation Officers of California are proposing a new law we call the Elevate Justice Act. This proposal is guided by mounting brain science research and would apply to people up to age 20, rather than the current cut-off at age 18.

Young people would receive age-appropriat­e programmin­g and services in the juvenile justice system, and provide them with tools for long term success in the community.

These young adults would have the added benefit of having their records sealed, which would help eliminate a barrier to gaining employment, educationa­l grants, and housing.

Young people would receive individual­ized family-centered, strength-based treatment and rehabilita­tion plans. They would be taught strategies to further limit the use of detention, expand training to better address racial and ethnic disparitie­s, and further protect public safety by addressing the risk and need factors of young people with ageappropr­iate services within the juvenile justice system.

California has a historic opportunit­y to help the nation further spur the transforma­tion of juvenile justice that will make a difference in millions of lives.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States