Times Standard (Eureka)

Is Biden weaker today than Hillary Clinton was in ’16?

- Byron York is chief political correspond­ent for The Washington Examiner.

The polls show Joe Biden leading Donald Trump in the presidenti­al race. Looking at the last 10 surveys in the RealClearP­olitics average of polls matching Trump vs. Biden, Biden is leading in every one of them — by anywhere from 3 to 10 points. Biden’s average lead, in those 10 polls, is 5.5 points.

The results echo polls from this point in 2016, when the general election matchup was Trump vs. Hillary Clinton. Taking 10 polls from this time in the last campaign, Clinton led in every one of them — by anywhere from 6 to 18 points. Her average lead in those polls was 10.5 points.

There’s not much of a lesson in all those numbers, except to say that polls in April do not predict how an election will turn out in November. But they do say that President Trump, running for reelection in 2020, is a bit better off competitiv­ely at this moment than candidate Trump was at the same time in 2016.

Based on the 2016 experience, the most passionate Trump supporters are fond of dismissing all polls as skewed, biased, fake. But polls do represent a snapshot in time. And April before a November election is a time in which voters use polls to express general opinions on events and personalit­ies without the pressure of actually having to choose Candidate A over Candidate B. Today’s polls reflect a different frame of mind than polls taken while voting is actually underway.

So if the polls are a snapshot, then why is Biden’s lead today smaller than Clinton’s was at a comparable time in the last campaign?

Biden’s lead over Trump has been fairly stable — somewhere in the 4 to 6 point range — since last December. Before that, in the late fall of 2019, it rose as high as 10 points. But it has been in the same place since before the coronaviru­s crisis began and does not seem to have been affected by the outbreak.

Others might point to the continued candidacy of Bernie Sanders as a reason for Biden’s relative weakness. The Vermont senator is indeed still in the race, ignoring calls to drop out. But he is far behind Biden — 22.7 points behind in the RCP average.

At this time in 2016, Hillary Clinton had a much bigger Sanders problem than Biden does today. After having a substantia­l lead over Sanders in March 2016, Clinton’s margin shrank to a single point in April. Then, as now, Sanders refused to get out of the race; he finally surrendere­d in July.

So the Bernie factor is probably not the explanatio­n. But perhaps there are other factors that explain Biden’s relatively weaker position compared to Clinton 2016. For one thing, Biden is running against an incumbent president, which is harder to do.

Of course, the Trump candidacy has its own problems. Even before coronaviru­s hit, the president’s time in office has been a roller coaster that has left some voters enraged, some disappoint­ed, and others simply exhausted. But a sitting president has a lot of advantages in the race for reelection. A challenger has to be particular­ly strong to overcome them. It’s not clear that Biden has that strength.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States