Times Standard (Eureka)

Huffman to the president: You can’t do that

- By Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin North Coast Rep. Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) are founders of the Congressio­nal Freethough­t Caucus.

In a single statement of breathtaki­ng arrogance and ignorance, President Trump threatens to trample the sovereign powers of the states under American federalism, the prerogativ­es of Congress under the 14th Amendment, and the rights of the people under the First Amendment and the 10th Amendment. In his dangerous rush to wipe out stay-athome public health orders and social distancing measures, President Trump has turned himself into a wrecking ball of the U.S. Constituti­on.

Nothing in the Constituti­on gives the president the power to override state public health decisions adopted by legislatur­es or governors under state laws adopted under the states’ 10th Amendment powers. Nothing in the Constituti­on gives the president the power to commandeer the machinery of state government for his own ideologica­l or political purposes; indeed the Constituti­on forbids it. Nothing in the Constituti­on gives the president the power to usurp Congressio­nal authority to enforce the people’s rights of equal protection, religious free exercise, or freedom of assembly. Congress can certainly take action under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to protect religious freedom against state government­s, as the Supreme Court found in City of Boerne v. Flores (1997), but Congressio­nal action must be “proportion­al” and “congruent” to a real threat to religious freedom, which is why the court in that case struck down the Religious Freedom Restoratio­n Act as applied against state government­s.

Congress has not acted to “reopen the churches” over state public health policies and orders, and it has not done so for good reason. All of these public health policies and orders are perfectly lawful, respectful of religious freedom and enhancing of the general welfare. If it is unsafe for states to permit in-person indoor assemblies of more than 10 people for the purposes of a social gathering, a wedding, a funeral for a COVID-19 patient, a campaign rally for Joe Biden, or a political demonstrat­ion against the idiocy of the Trump administra­tion, then it is equally unsafe for them to permit in-door assemblies of more than 10 people for the purposes of religious worship. We have seen numerous cases where people, including ministers, have contracted this dread disease at religious events. People certainly have a right to believe in religious miracles and to engage in magical thinking, as the president does, but the states have no obligation or power to operate on that basis.

The Constituti­on commands religious neutrality, which is why police forces and fire department­s will rush to the aid of churches if they are victims of burglary or arson in the exact same way they will rush to the rescue of department stores, schools and private homes. By the same token, the Supreme Court has found, religions are legitimate­ly governed by neutral, universall­y applicable laws, like laws against child labor, illegal drug possession, child sex abuse, and so on. A private church has no more right to endanger the health of its members or the rest of the public than does a private school or a political party, even though the existence of all these groups is protected by the Constituti­on. The key justice insisting that churches have the right to official government neutrality and nothing more was Antonin Scalia.

Opening up any corporate assemblies, including churches, against the advice of public health experts and medical profession­als, is a recipe for COVID-19 outbreaks that will put people’s lives at risk and worsen our public health and economic morass.

America’s founders did not give the president the powers he is recklessly asserting. Deciding the safety of public gatherings based on the neutral criterion of numbers of people present is a policy choice for state and local public health authoritie­s, not a pandering president who recommends the ingestion of disinfecta­nts. The president clearly understand­s neither public health science nor the constituti­onal limits of his authority.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States