Times Standard (Eureka)

Monday’s 6.2 reminds us to brush up on our preparedne­ss

- Lori Dengler is an emeritus professor of geology at Humboldt State University, an expert in tsunami and earthquake hazards. Questions or comments about this column, or want a free copy of the preparedne­ss magazine “Living on Shaky Ground”? Leave a message

I had just started a holiday baking project when I noticed a tone from my phone. It took a second or two to make it out — a voice saying, “Earthquake Drop Cover and Hold On.” It was the MyShake App on my phone. A second later an alert went off on my husband’s phone. And then we heard the windows rattle and the house began to sway.

This was a first for me, the first time the Earthquake Early Warning App gave me a notice and shaking soon followed. California’s MyShake earthquake notificati­on system was released statewide in October 2019. It was first triggered on the North Coast on March 18, 2020. That earthquake was a 5.2 on Cape Mendocino and I felt it lightly. But I didn’t get an alert because I was outside of the automated felt zone generated by the algorithm. Four days later, my phone announced a 6.2 quake and told me to expect shaking. I got down under my desk and waited and waited. But no shaking followed — that quake was only a 4.8 and I really was outside of the felt zone.

Last Monday, the system worked, and several thousand people actually got a notificati­on a few seconds before we felt it. At my house, the shaking was mild, and it was over quickly. The first magnitude estimate was 5.2 with a location near Cape Mendocino. Five minutes later, I received a statement from the National Tsunami Warning Center in Alaska with a magnitude of 6.2 and that a tsunami was not expected.

It is not at all unusual for the first magnitude and location estimates to be off, especially here on the North Coast. Location is a triangulat­ion process and ideally seismologi­sts use data from instrument­s that surround the source. We don’t have ocean bottom instrument­s and that means no good constraint­s for offshore quakes. Accessing additional records and improved data processing reduces that uncertaint­y but it means adjustment­s in location, depth, and magnitude can continue for several days afterward.

As I write, the USGS locates the earthquake offshore of Cape Mendocino, 23 miles west of Petrolia, 45 miles SW of Eureka, and 54 miles away from my home in McKinleyvi­lle. The depth is listed at nine miles beneath the surface and fault motion was primarily horizontal. At first glance, it looks like this earthquake is on the Mendocino fault, the plate boundary between the Pacific plate and the Gorda plate that I wrote about two weeks ago.

But a closer look reveals a more complicate­d story. This earthquake was within the Mendocino triple junction region, the complex zone of deformatio­n that marks the meeting of the Pacific, North American, and Gorda plates. It is also where three major fault systems connect: the San Andreas, the Mendocino fault, and the Cascadia subduction zone.

There is a lot of stress concentrat­ed in the triple junction region. The result is numerous faults and folds, high uplift rates and some of the most deformed rock units I’ve ever seen. This region and the adjacent offshore area is the most seismicall­y active area of the contiguous 58 states. Current discussion among seismologi­sts suggests it wasn’t on the Mendocino fault and is more likely on a fault within the Gorda plate. And we can’t rule out the involvemen­t of the northern end of the San Andreas fault yet either.

The best news about the earthquake is that no injuries have been reported even though it was very widely felt. More than 4,300 people responded to the USGS Did You Feel It website from as far south as Monterey, north to Coos Bay and inland to the Lake Tahoe area. We’ve also got a pretty good tally on the impacts. There were numerous reports of items knocked from shelves in the Cape Mendocino and Eel River Valley area. Ceiling tiles fell at the Bear River Casino and broken bottles littered grocery store aisles. A number of small landslides were triggered, and some roads were temporaril­y blocked.

The most significan­t damage was the partial wall collapse of the Loleta Creamery. The Creamery is an old brick building and has sat derelict since bankruptcy proceeding­s on the Loleta Cheese Factory began over five years ago. It is identified by the County as a hazardous structure due to its lack of reinforcem­ent and general disrepair. Fortunatel­y, no one was in the building at the time of the earthquake.

Here’s a quick runthrough of the questions people are asking me.

• How did they know so quickly there was no tsunami threat? The earthquake was too small to pose a tsunami threat and it was the wrong type of fault motion. We need vertical deformatio­n of the sea floor to generate a tsunami and it typically take a magnitude 7 or larger. But if you had been n in a tsunami zone, feeling the quake should have prompted you to begin heading away from the beach and to higher ground. Most of our local radio stations did a good job of getting the “no tsunami threat” message out once it had been posted.

• Why did people have such different experience­s of the earthquake in locations that seemed to be nearby? There are many factors that contribute to individual experience and distance from the epicenter is only one of them. Local geology plays a role — people living near the bay on softer sediments tended to feel it more strongly than those on bedrock. Home constructi­on contribute­s as well — upper floors of wood-frame houses tend to sway more. Even two people in the same building can have different experience­s — if you are sitting or lying down, it will feel stronger than when walking or active.

• Did this earthquake relieve stress and make a bigger quake more likely? The earthquake did release stress — that’s what an earthquake is. But it is unlikely to play any role in the regional seismic threat. While a 6.2 may sound big, it’s small compared to the regional stress accumulati­on. There is a network of GPS instrument­s onshore that can detect small changes in the stress and have been able to sense small changes resulting from past earthquake­s. The Dec. 20 earthquake appears to have had no effect. Bottom line — we are still poised to have another strong earthquake and the next one could be larger or closer to populated areas.

The most important take-home message is we live in earthquake country and use this reminder to review how prepared you are. When the ground starts shaking, PLEASE DROP — COVER — HOLD ON.

 ?? CONTRIBUTE­D ?? Historic earthquake­s of magnitude 6or higher are mapped off the coast of Humboldt County.
CONTRIBUTE­D Historic earthquake­s of magnitude 6or higher are mapped off the coast of Humboldt County.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States