Times Standard (Eureka)

With Roe in doubt, states act on abortion limits, expansions

- By Lindsay Whitehurst

SALT LAKE CITY » It didn’t take long for abortion to re-emerge as a flashpoint in state legislatur­es.

Less than a month into the 2022 legislativ­e sessions, battles over the future of abortion already are setting up around the U.S. Republican lawmakers are proposing new restrictio­ns modeled after laws in Texas and Mississipp­i that present a direct challenge to the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, while some Democratic-led states are working to preserve or expand access.

The activity in state legislatur­es was anticipate­d after the U.S. Supreme Court, with its conservati­ve majority, signaled it was ready to make seismic changes to the nationwide right to abortion that has stood for nearly half a century. If the court overturns Roe v. Wade entirely, the decision on whether to keep abortion legal would fall to the states.

More than 20 states already have laws on the books to ban or dramatical­ly restrict abortion if Roe v. Wade is overturned. As legislativ­e sessions begin, several are considerin­g new bans.

“This could be a really, really dramatic year in terms of people’s ability to access abortion care and to decide if, when and how they become a parent,” said Kristin Ford, vice-president of communicat­ions and outreach at NARAL

Pro-Choice America, a proabortio­n rights group. “At this time next year, we could be looking at a scenario in which more than half of the country has lost access to abortion ... It will have consequenc­es for everyone.”

Against that backdrop, California lawmakers will consider plans this year to become a “sanctuary” for those seeking reproducti­ve care. That could include paying for travel, lodging and procedures for people coming from other states.

“We are confrontin­g an all-out assault on reproducti­ve freedom in America. There are powerful forces working tirelessly to drag us backwards. But here in California, we are not going back,” said Assemblywo­man Cottie Petrie-Norris, as state lawmakers proposed eight bills on Thursday. “We will continue to fight for reproducti­ve freedom.”

Susan Arnall, director of outreach for the anti-abortion Right to Life League, said other Democratic-led states are likely to follow California’s lead. Her organizati­on is fighting the legislatio­n introduced in the nation’s most populous state.

Even so, she said abortion opponents have gained the upper hand throughout the U.S.

“Life is winning ... and the abortion industry is losing,” Arnall said.

Other Democratic-leaning states are not yet copying California, though New Jersey recently became the 15th state to protect the right to abortion in state law, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights think tank. Vermont could move toward enshrining “reproducti­ve autonomy” in its constituti­on this year. In Michigan, abortion-rights groups are seeking an amendment enshrining the right to abortion in the state constituti­on.

Meanwhile, at least seven states could follow Texas, which has already effectivel­y banned abortions after six weeks with a law strategica­lly written to avoid a federal court challenge. The Supreme Court has allowed the law to remain in effect, even though it appears to contradict the Roe decision.

Similar proposals have been introduced in Ohio, Alabama, Oklahoma, Missouri, Florida and Arizona. South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, a possible 2024 presidenti­al contender, released a proposal on Friday modeled after the Texas law. She said it would “ensure that both unborn children and their mothers are protected in South Dakota.”

Other states that already have six-week bans on the books also could amend those measures to look more like the Texas law so they can take effect, said Katie Glenn, government affairs counsel at Americans United for Life, an anti-abortion group.

The Texas law is unusual because it allows private citizens to file civil lawsuits against anyone who helps someone else get an abortion after six weeks. It has made legal challenges difficult because the government is not involved in enforcemen­t.

More than a dozen states have passed abortion bans after six weeks but have seen those efforts blocked by the courts. That has made the Texas model more attractive to conservati­ve lawmakers.

“Our message to lawmakers is, ‘Full steam ahead.’ If you have felt like maybe something’s not worth doing because it might be enjoined or you’re worried about it, this is a great opportunit­y for state lawmakers to let the Supreme Court know, ‘We’ve got this,’” Glenn said.

Meanwhile, at least three Republican-led states — Arizona, Florida and West Virginia — are weighing bans on the procedure after 15 weeks, similar to the Mississipp­i law that the Supreme Court appeared to view favorably during arguments in December. Under Roe, abortions are legal until the point a fetus can survive outside the womb, which is usually around 24 weeks.

In Florida, which currently allows abortions up to that point, GOP legislativ­e leaders are optimistic about a proposal to ban it after 15 weeks, with some health-related exceptions but none for rape and incest.

“There’s a lot of pro-life legislatio­n. We’re going to be welcoming it,” Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis told reporters earlier this month. He is up for reelection this year and is considered a top Republican presidenti­al hopeful for 2024.

In another major shift last year, the Food and Drug Administra­tion made a regulatory change that allows people access to abortion medication by mail after obtaining a prescripti­on online. That promises to be another front in the legal debate over abortion. Some states could allow pharmacist­s to opt out of dispensing the drugs if they oppose abortion.

Last year, eight states passed measures restrictin­g abortion medication sent through the mail in anticipati­on of the FDA decision. A handful of states, including Republican-led Iowa, will debate bills on the topic this year, said Elizabeth Nash, a state policy analyst at the Guttmacher Institute.

Last year was the “worst year for abortion rights” since the Roe decision in 1973, Nash said, with over 100 restrictio­ns enacted in the states.

“It just feels like the state sessions in 2022 are also going to be very active on abortion restrictio­ns,” she said. “It feels like we’re at the beginning of another wave.”

 ?? DAMIAN DOVARGANES — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE ?? Demonstrat­ors rally to demand continued access to abortion during the March for Reproducti­ve Justice in downtown Los Angeles.
DAMIAN DOVARGANES — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE Demonstrat­ors rally to demand continued access to abortion during the March for Reproducti­ve Justice in downtown Los Angeles.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States