Vote no on Measure A and its impacts

At the Cal Poly debate on Measure A on Feb. 1, it became evident that Measure A is a targeted assault on an industry deeply woven into Humboldt County's history and identity. Dozens of small farmers, proudly wearing green shirts emblazoned with “I heart Humboldt, vote NO on Measure A,” filled the room, reflecting the widespread opposition to this measure.

Proponents of Measure A dismiss concerns as mere misunderstandings, but the truth is they reflect the analysis of Humboldt's Planning Department and many other independent legal reviews of Measure A's 38 pages. Proponents have consistently made dramatic and false accusations against cannabis farmers without evidence or support from environmental groups or regulators.

It's troubling that the proponents openly admit to sidestepping the public process during the development of cannabis ordinances. Cannabis's ripple effects extend beyond farms, affecting businesses countywide. Garberville is a stark example, with dwindling sales impacting various sectors. This downturn isn't confined to one town; it's felt across Humboldt County.

There are just 335 acres (0.52 square miles) of highly regulated permitted cannabis in Humboldt, compared with over 620,000 acres (968 square miles) of non-cannabis agriculture. When questioned about why Measure A targets only cannabis with punitive regulation, proponents said they had been advised by their lawyer that initiatives may legally address only a single subject at a time. This admission is alarming and suggests a precedent for targeting other industries without public input.

To the undecided voter: educate yourself on Measure A's farreaching implications, and vote NO on March 5. — Casandra Taliaferro, Redway