Times Standard (Eureka)

INJUNCTION BATTLE WITH CITY DROPPED

CEQA lawsuits will continue, Citizens for a Better Eureka say

- By Ruth Schneider rschneider@times-standard.com

Citizens for a Better Eureka announced this week it is dropping its injunction efforts to halt housing projects in Eureka's downtown and Old Town areas, but the environmen­tal, or CEQA, lawsuits will continue.

The announceme­nt came days before the injunction­s were set to be ruled on. If approved, the injunction­s would have put a halt to several housing developmen­t projects.

“Although members understood the likelihood of obtaining injunction­s was low, they decided to pursue them to secure more certainty that the city could not move forward with its plan,” a news release from the firm doing public relations for Citizens for a Better Eureka stated.

Michelle Costantine-Blackwell, a group member, said in the news release that “there is currently very little funding for the downtown developmen­ts, so it is better not to waste the court's time with these injunction­s.”

Asked to further explain the statement, given millions have been awarded for local projects, Gail Rymer, the public relations contact for Citizens for a Better Eureka, stated in an email that, “The grant money that has been received for the developmen­ts does not cover the costs of constructi­on of the building(s). It does not seem feasible that total funding will be received prior to the November election.”

Eureka City Manager Miles Slattery, in contrast, states there is funding for the projects.

“We are well into the funding projects on all of these projects,” he told the Times-Standard on Thursday. “We have over $30 million for the EaRTH Center; we have $30 million for the Scattered Site project.”

But Slattery also noted the injunction­s did in fact waste time and resources.

“It's extremely unfortunat­e that they wasted not only the court's time but our legal time in order to have responses for that,” he said, “and getting all of the other people involved from the (California) attorney general to the Wiyot to legal ser

vices to the individual­s in legal services representi­ng us as well as Citizens for Responsibl­e Transporta­tion — a lot of people and then a lot of effort and a lot of time to address their claims.”

Citizens for a Better Eureka plans to continue the CEQA lawsuits against the city and is listed as part of the closed session for the next Eureka City Council meeting Tuesday evening.

Citizens for a Better Eureka also created a ballot initiative set for the November election that, if passed would bar the city from removing downtown parking spaces — meaning if they proceeded as planned and leased cityowned parking lots for affordable housing, they would need to build parking spaces for each slot lost — and requiring them to rezone the former Jacobs Middle School campus for housing.

Slattery said the city will continue to move forward. In an ideal scenario, the first of the housing projects could break ground in 2025 and be completed in 2026.

Slattery estimated the housing projects — scattered around downtown at lots at Fifth and D streets, Eighth and G streets, and Sixth and M streets — could be completed by 2027.

Rymer stated Thursday that Citizens for a Better Eureka, “always understood the likelihood of succeeding on the lawsuits was low.”

She also underscore­d that the purpose of the suits was not to halt developmen­t.

“The goal of the lawsuits is to have the city finally start a dialogue with downtown business owners to discuss their concerns about how the modified housing element developmen­t proposals in the housing element will impact their businesses and the economic vitality of downtown.

“It is hoped the city will meet and work with the business owners to discuss their concerns and work together on a solution that supports both housing and the economic vitality of downtown.”

With the injunction­s being dropped, there are no current hearings set, Rymer said.

And she also accused the city of dragging its toes.

“The parties are currently developing the administra­tive record, which is expected to take months,” she said.

“It has also been extremely frustratin­g to CBE that the city has been so slow in producing its records that are needed to complete the administra­tive record, and this is something CBE will be focusing more on in the coming weeks.”

In another recent legal loss for Citizens for a Better Eureka, a judge tossed a lawsuit alleging election code violations earlier this month.

Also this month, the city of Eureka was lauded by the state for its efforts to create affordable housing.

“All of these projects are much more viable and much closer to being able to get funded with this designatio­n,” Slattery told the Times-Standard earlier this month.

The housing element of Eureka's General Plan — which is also involved in a Citizens for a Better Eureka CEQA lawsuit — aims for around 900 units of housing to be built by 2040, a third of which must be affordable.

 ?? SAGE ALEXANDER — THE TIMES-STANDARD ?? Citizens for a Better Eureka, proponents of the Housing for All initiative, announced they will drop its efforts to seek an injunction to halt developmen­ts like the one planned for this lot.
SAGE ALEXANDER — THE TIMES-STANDARD Citizens for a Better Eureka, proponents of the Housing for All initiative, announced they will drop its efforts to seek an injunction to halt developmen­ts like the one planned for this lot.
 ?? EUREKA CITY COUNCIL SCREENSHOT ?? An artist's rendering shows the EaRTH Center project that is being planned for downtown.
EUREKA CITY COUNCIL SCREENSHOT An artist's rendering shows the EaRTH Center project that is being planned for downtown.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States