Levity's La­bor Lost

Trillions - - In This Issue - By Robert A. Nel­son

Sev­eral times dur­ing the 20th cen­tury, ge­nius in­ven­tors dis­cov­ered and de­vel­oped a va­ri­ety of el­e­gant meth­ods to nul­lify grav­ity.

Main­stream academia and in­dus­try of­ten scoffed at the re­sults, with the re­sult that these cre­ations faded into ob­scu­rity un­til they be­came avail­able again via dis­tri­bu­tion on the in­ter­net. A sam­pling of what some of those in­ven­tors de­vel­oped are de­scribed be­low.

Ed­ward Far­row : Con­dens­ing Dy­namo

In the first decade of the 1900s, Ed­ward S Far­row per­fected a sim­ple me­chan­i­cal de­vice which nul­li­fies grav­ity. He demon­strated his so-called "Con­dens­ing Dy­namo" at the 1926 World's Fair. Far­row never patented the in­ven­tion, how­ever, and to­day the only de­tails that re­main were pub­lished in The Tech­ni­cal World Mag­a­zine (Novem­ber 1911), ex­cerpted here:

"...Mr Far­row sus­pended a book from a pair of scales in his lab­o­ra­tory and weighed it. The vol­ume tipped

the scales at 18 ounces. To the book he at­tached a me­chan­i­cal de­vice in the shape of a small rec­tan­gu­lar box, which he calls a 'con­dens­ing dy­namo' and ap­plied power from a neigh­bor­ing elec­tri­cal switch. A most re­mark­able thing then oc­curred. As the cur­rent set the wheels in the dy­namo whirling, the in­di­ca­tor of the scales slowly re­ceded un­til it stopped at 15 ounces. Ap­par­ently the book had lost 3 ounces of its weight -- in other words, one-sixth of the power of grav­i­ta­tion be­tween the book and the earth had been over­come.

"The in­ven­tion is based on the in­ten­si­fi­ca­tion of Hertzian waves. it has been learned that by do­ing this a par­al­lel and cor­re­spond­ing in­ten­si­fi­ca­tion oc­curs with the ver­ti­cal force which con­trols grav­i­ta­tion. Thus buoy­ancy is added to an ob­ject held to earth or pro­pelled to­wards it by grav­ity.

"It has been found that the me­chan­i­cal de­vices for con­trol­ling elec­tric­ity also ap­ply to grav­ity, reg­u­lat­ing or in­ten­si­fy­ing the force of this at­trac­tion of for­eign ob­jects to earth. By in­ten­si­fy­ing the mo­tion of the elec­tri­cal waves through the sup­posed ether there will de­velop com­po­nents in all di­rec­tions. If this force or mo­tion acts ver­ti­cally, it will by the law of re­ac­tion di­min­ish a force such as grav­i­ta­tion act- ing down­ward to­ward the earth. For want of a bet­ter name, Mr Far­row calls this force, when act­ing up­ward, a "ver­ti­cal com­po­nent" and the name is well cho­sen. "Mr Far­row's me­chan­i­cal de­vice in­creases the force of the Hertzian wave and this in­creased power is trans­mit­ted to the "ver­ti­cal com­po­nent". The lat­ter thus in­ten­si­fied, of­fers a pro­por­tion­ate re­sis­tance to grav­i­ta­tion and the force of the lat­ter is re­duced, thus giv­ing buoy­ancy to any ob­ject to which the con­dens­ing dy­namo may be at­tached...

"[T]here is pro­duced a hor­i­zon­tal, cir­cu­lar, flat sheet, so to speak, of Hertzian waves which ra­di­ate out­wardly..."

Some in­ves­ti­ga­tors have spec­u­lated that the field was pro­duced by a hor­i­zon­tal ring of spark gaps which gen­er­ated a pla­nar field that dis­trib­utes the weight over a wide area of the grav­i­ta­tional field by its in­ter­ac­tion with the ge­o­mag­netic field.

Luigi Rota : Aero Ra­dio Bal­lis­tique

Luigi G. V. Rota (1886-1951) was an Ital­ian sci­en­tist who worked with early radar tech­nol­ogy un­til he dis­cov­ered the Uni­ver­sal Cur­rent. His sub­se­quent work was di­rected to de­vel­op­ment of in­stru­ments for the de­tec­tion, col­lec­tion, con­cen­tra­tion, con­trol and ap­pli­ca­tion of the cur­rent and its three tel­luric forms.

The Uni­ver­sal Cur­rent flows a few me­ters be­neath the earth and gen­er­ates a field in the at­mos­phere. Rota was con­vinced that all mat­ter is com­posed of con­densed Uni­ver­sal Cur­rent, and that any metal can be dis­solved to slowly re­lease that en­ergy. He con­structed lam­i­nated metal blocks which he buried to de­tect and col­lect the cur­rent for con­ver­sion to elec­tric­ity. He also found that it af­fects grav­ity, and be­tween 1910-1915, he de­vel­oped a “Sta­bil­isi­teur” that floated weight­less.

“The de­vice works by op­pos­ing the mag­netic and elec­tric field of the earth ren­der­ing the de­vice weight­less”, he said. Af­ter he made a pub­lic demon­stra­tion of the amaz­ing ma­chine, he was lauded in the French press as "Jules Verne in ac­tion".

Rota con­sid­ered the UC to be a fun­da­men­tal en­ergy, of which elec­tro­mag­netism was a byprod­uct. It is the source of all phys­i­cal phenomena in­clud­ing life. The UC con­trols the man­i­fes­ta­tion of all mat­ter, which is com­posed of UC and can be de­com­posed into it.

As de­scribed in his French Patent FR508472 ("Process and Ap­pa­ra­tus to Main­tain a Body in Sus­pen­sion in the Air, Based on the Elec­tric and Mag­netic Forces"), the ap­pa­ra­tus con­sisted of "a se­ries of cylin­ders united by means of re­cip­ro­cal trans­form­ers and con­nected to a bat­tery, ac­cu­mu­la­tor or dy­namo so that each cylin­der is con­nected to the op­po­site pole of the ad­ja­cent cylin­der by coils hav­ing such an in­duc­tance as to pre­vent the wave cir­cu­lat­ing in the bat­tery cir­cuit. Rota de­scribes a ro­tat­ing cylin­der el­e­ment in his Bri­tish Patent GB129059 ("Ap­pa­ra­tus for de­tect­ing the prox­im­ity of mines, sub­marines, ice­bergs, &c."): "The cylin­der has in­su­lated wind­ings con­nected through brush and ring con­tacts with a sen­si­tive gal­vanome­ter, and may be ro­tated by a flex­i­ble shaft and bevel gear..." French Patent FR508472 ("Process and Ap­pa­ra­tus to Main­tain a Body in Sus­pen­sion in the Air...")

He de­scribed a ro­tat­ing cylin­der el­e­ment again in his Bri­tish Patent GB128624 ("Ap­pa­ra­tus for the Con­cen­tra­tion of Elec­tric Waves in a Sin­gle Di­rec­tion or upon a Fixed Point"), in which "the cylin­ders are made with par­al­lel wires with an in­ter­me­di­ate in­duc­tance." In the 1970s Dr. Wil­liam Hooper de­vel­oped an "All-elec­tric Mo­tional Field Gen­er­a­tor" (US Patent US3656013) in­volv­ing cylin­ders wound with par­al­lel wires. The re­sul­tant field pen­e­trates Fara­day cages and mod­i­fies grav­ity. Per­haps the two in­ven­tions are re­lated.

Henry Wal­lace: Kine­mas­sic Force Field

In the 1970s Henry Wal­lace dis­cov­ered the so-called Kine­mas­sic Field (KF), which he gen­er­ated by counter-ro­tat­ing masses of half-in­te­gral spin nu­clei ma­te­rial (cop­per, zinc, lead, tin, nickel, &c.). These are the same el­e­ments uti­lized by Louis Rota in his lev­i­ta­tor, be­ing used in the same way -- counter-ro­tat­ing masses -- to neu­tral­ize grav­ity. Wal­lace re­ceived three patents for his in­ven­tion : US3626605 ("Gen­er­at­ing a Sec­ondary Grav­i­ta­tional Force Field"); US3626606 ("Gen­er­at­ing a Dy­namic Force Field"), and US3823570 ("Heat Pump").

Therein he ex­plained his dis­cov­ery in terms of mod­ern physics that might help us un­der­stand the phenomena pro­duced by Rota.

"The kine­mas­sic force field is gen­er­ated as a re­sult of the rel­a­tive mo­tion of bod­ies of el­e­men­tal nu­clei char­ac­ter­ized by half in­te­gral "spin" val­ues... The nu­cle­ons in turn com­prise the el­e­men­tal par­ti­cles of the nu­cleus; i.e., the neu­trons and pro­tons... The value of the kine­mas­sic force field... is the al­ge­braic sum of the fields cre­ated by rea­son of the dy­namic in­ter­ac­tion of both el­e­men­tary par­ti­cles and of the dis­crete bod­ies... The kine­mas­sic field causes the spin nu­clei axes to re­ori­ent par­al­lel with the axis of ro­ta­tion and re­sults in a field of summed dipole mo­ments that form a sec­ondary dy­namic in­ter­ac­tion with the sur­round­ing ma­terium.

"By spin nu­clei ma­te­rial is meant ma­te­ri­als in na­ture which ex­hibit a nu­clear ex­ter­nal an­gu­lar mo­men­tum com­po­nent. This in­cludes both the in­trin­sic spin of the un­paired nu­cleon as well as that due to the or­bital mo­tion of these nu­cle­ons...

"The thus re­ori­ented nu­clear struc­ture may lend it­self to such uses as mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the grav­i­ta­tional field act­ing on a body... gen­er­at­ing of grav­ity waves for com­mu­ni­ca­tion and other en­ergy trans­fer.... in ad­di­tion to uti­liza­tion in many, many other fields..."

Edgar Holling­shead: Odic Ac­tiv­ity Ray

Another in­trigu­ing method of over­com­ing grav­ity was dis­cov­ered and de­vel­oped by Dr Edgar Holling­shead in the 1920s -- the Odic Ray, which also pro­duced sev­eral other as­tound­ing phenomena such as dis­in­te­gra­tion and trans­parency.

This in­ven­tion was never de­bunked as a hoax. It sim­ply drifted in the ocean of in­for­ma­tion af­ter the in­ven­tor died. Per­haps (prob­a­bly), how­ever, it has been de­vel­oped in top se­crecy. For­tu­nately for our in­quir­ing minds, Dr. Holling­shead ex­plained his dis­cov­er­ies at length in an ar­ti­cle he wrote for the mag­a­zine Ra­dio Jour­nal (May 1923): "The Odic Ray -- It's Ori­gin and Na­ture". It is quoted here at length lest any cru­cial fac­toids be edited out of ex­is­tence:

"Some years ago I be­came con­vinced that mat­ter did not de­pend upon phys­i­cal prop­er­ties for its weight, but upon the speed of the atoms mak­ing up the mol­e­cules, and I be­gan search­ing for a process by which a force could be gen­er­ated that would be high enough in point of speed to change the atomic speed of mat­ter. Know­ing that it would be im­pos­si­ble to re­lease or gen­er­ate such a force out of any form of mat­ter, I turned my at­ten­tion to the study of the na­ture of elec­tric­ity and other nat­u­ral forces.

"Be­liev­ing that man could not con­ceive of a force un­less there were some­thing mov­ing, I there­fore be­lieved that all forces must be made up of sub­stance in mo­tion. The sub­stance that forms the nat­u­ral "body" of forces of so-called laws of na­ture is not mat­ter in the sense that the term is or­di­nar­ily used, but a sub­stance so fine and vi­brat­ing at such a high rate of speed that it can­not be com­pre­hended by any fac­ulty of man ex­cept­ing his rea­son. Thus con­sid­er­ing the na­ture of elec­tric­ity, rea­son tells us that we must have a sub­stance trav­el­ing at a very high rate of speed, and that this sub­stance must be gov­erned and con­trolled by the same prin­ci­ples that gov­ern all sub­stance or mat­ter. There must be one gen­eral prin­ci­ple gov­ern­ing the for­ma­tion of sub­stance through­out the uni­verse. In other words, the sub­stance or body of elec­tric­ity, termed "am­per­age", must be made up of in­finitely small ed­dies of force -- the same as or­di­nary mat­ter is.

"As is well known, in mat­ter we have three dis­tinct classes of ed­dies of force, which seem to be a per­fect coun­ter­part of a so­lar sys­tem. We have, namely, the mol­e­cule, made up of elec­trons, also trav­el­ing in or­bits; and the elec­tron has been found to be made up of still smaller par­ti­cles, also trav­el­ing in cir­cu­lar pro­gres­sion . Thus, we hve three dis­tinct phases of force in mat­ter. We also have three dis­tinct phases in ac-

tion in the body or am­per­age of elec­tric­ity. The world is more or less fa­mil­iar with the pos­i­tive and neg­a­tive sides or phases of elec­tric­ity, but I have proved by ex­per­i­men­ta­tion that there is a dom­i­nant or third phase in all forces. That is, there is a pos­i­tive, a neg­a­tive, and a dom­i­nant or so­lar man­i­fes­ta­tion, and these three phases of force are at def­i­nite dis­tances apart in the point of speed, and their re­la­tion­ship is like 3, 6, and 9 on a rule. [ It is worth not­ing here that John Keely and Nikola Tesla both in­sisted on the im­por­tance of the 3:6:9 ra­tio.]

"Con­sid­er­ing elec­tric­ity or any of the so-called nat­u­ral forces of na­ture from this stand­point, we find that we have in re­al­ity two forces in one: -- we have a rec­ti­lin­ear ac­tion and also a ro­tat­ing ac­tion in all forces. We can il­lus­trate this ac­tion by con­sid­er­ing a stream of wa­ter. Sup­pose we have a stream of wa­ter flow­ing at 20 miles per hour; the atoms mak­ing up the mol­e­cules of this wa­ter are trav­el­ing in cir­cu­lar pro­gres­sion at thou­sands of miles per sec­ond. This same con­di­tion I have proved to be ex­is­tent in the na­ture of elec­tric­ity, and I have also proved that these ed­dies of force mak­ing up the body or am­per­age of elec­tric­ity can be bro­ken up and the force cor­re­spond­ing to the elec­tronic force in mat­ter re­leased. This force I have given the name of "Odic Ac­tiv­ity", due to the prin­ci­pals in­volved in re­leas­ing or gen­er­at­ing the same.

"I have found that the rate of speed of Odic Ac­tiv­ity can be changed; its po­lar­ity re­versed, and its di­rec­tion of dis­charge con­trolled, as I have changed its rate all the way from where it would af­fect a pho­to­graphic plate the same as or­di­nary light clear up to a point where it has dis­in­te­grated mat­ter the in­stant it touched it. The only dif­fer­ence there can be be­tween one ray and another is its dif­fer­ence in speed, plus a pos­si­ble dif­fer­ence in po­lar­ity or char­ac­ter. "Hence, it will be seen that since the po­lar­ity or char­ac­ter of the Odic Ray can be al­tered or changed, it is pos­si­ble for it, when prop­erly aligned, to du­pli­cate any of the "rays" or rates of force known, be­tween or­di­nary light and the point of dis­in­te­gra­tion of mat­ter. This range or rates of force will en­com­pass the X-ray, the Ra­dium rays, the Ul­tra-vi­o­let rays, and var­i­ous rates that are known but which have not been named. [Got Ter­a­hertz?]

"As all mat­ter is known to be formed of mol­e­cules, atoms and elec­trons, or of in­finitely small par­ti­cles of sub­stance trav­el­ing at great speed in cir­cu­lar pro­gres­sion, rea­son proves to us that mat­ter does not de­pend upon phys­i­cal prop­er­ties for its weight, but does de­pend upon the speed of these par­ti­cles of sub­stance, which sets up or causes a re­sis­tance to the flow of a force of na­ture pass­ing into the earth. And as the pre­dom­i­nat­ing force that is known to be trav­el­ing into the earth is called "grav­i­ta­tion", the atomic speed or force stored up in these minute ed­dies of force must be re­sist­ing grav­i­ta­tion, -- thus caus­ing what we call weight.

"With this hy­poth­e­sis in mind, I found that by the use of the Odic Ray the de­gree or speed of these ed­dies could be al­tered, and this re­sis­tance changed, thus chang­ing the weight of mat­ter. In over a hun­dred dif­fer­ent tests, I have changed the weight of prac­ti­cally all of the base met­als, hav­ing changed alu­minum ap­prox­i­mately 20%. And to prove that the prin­ci­ple was cor­rect, I have re­versed the process and in­creased the weight back to nor­mal, and to heav­ier than nor­mal, thereby prov­ing beyond a ques­tion of doubt that the weight of ob­jects de­pends upon atomic force and not upon phys­i­cal prop­er­ties..."

Pop­u­lar Sci­ence mag­a­zine fea­tured a pho­to­graph of the Odic Ray Gen­er­a­tor in March 1922. The ac­com­pa­ny­ing cap­tion read, "Dis­cov­ery of “Odic Rays” of high pen­e­tra­tion pro­duced sim­ply by the elec­tric cur­rent drawn from an or­di­nary light socket, and yet with the cu­ra­tive and medic­i­nal value of X-rays, is claimed by Dr. Edgar L. Holling­shead, of Pasadena, Calif.

"With sim­ple, in­ex­pen­sive ap­pa­ra­tus he is re­ported to have passed rays through 11-1/2 inches of lead and 4-1/2 inches of steel, at such strength as to sear den­tal X-ray films en­cased in tin­foil...

"Doc­tor Holling­shead’s claims are based on tests made in the pres­ence of eye­wit­nesses who se­lected at ran­dom the films ex­posed to the rays, re­tained the du­pli­cates, and de­vel­oped the two si­mul­ta­ne­ously in the pres­ence of an un­prej­u­diced com­mit­tee. Af­ter ex­po­sure, these films were found to be per­cep­ti­bly dark­ened.

"Doc­tor Holling­shead de­clares that... elec­tric­ity is a sub­stance. Am­per­age is the sub­stance of elec­tric­ity, and volt­age is the speed. The form that ma­te­rial sub­stances takes is due to their rates of atomic speed."

Holling­shead first in­ten­si­fied its atomic speed (volt­age), then "broke it up to re­lease the Od". The Odic Ray also caused hard clay to ex­plode, and it made rocks trans­par­ent. Metal was caused to be­come "per­ma­nently cold beyond the pos­si­bil­ity of ever be­com­ing heated", and wa­ter in­stantly dis­in­te­grated into hy­dro­gen and oxy­gen.

Dr Holling­shead elab­o­rated fur­ther about the Odic Ray in an in­ter­view given to the Syra­cuse Jour­nal (NJ) in Jan­uary, 1922: "Ten years ago I came to the con­clu­sion that mat­ter did not de­pend upon phys­i­cal prop­er­ties for its weight, but that weight is de­ter­mined by the atomic speed of mat­ter.

"It is ac­cepted as fact that mat­ter is an ag­gre­ga­tion of mol­e­cules. Now, mol­e­cules are ed­dies of force, trav­el­ing in cir­cu­lar pro­gres­sion. These in turn are formed of still tinier par­ti­cles sim­i­larly in mo­tion, called atomic speed. Atoms are com­posed of elec­trons and ions, which have been split up and found to be com­posed of still smaller par­ti­cles. "I con­cluded, there­fore, that there is no such thing as a solid, but that what we call a solid is in re­al­ity a seething mass of whirling force. "The only way in which force can man­i­fest it­self is through re­sis­tance to other force, prin­ci­pally grav­ity -- which we call weight. "Grav­i­ta­tion is force com­ing from the sun; the neg­a­tive, lev­i­ta­tion, is force re­turned from earth to sun. The weight of an ob­ject is the de­gree of re­sis­tance mat­ter im­poses in the path of these two forces, and the de­gree of re­sis­tance in turn is de­pen­dent upon the speed of the cir­cu­lar ed­dies of force of which mat­ter is com­posed. "My ex­per­i­ments have been to find a way of gen­er­at­ing force that would al­ter the speed of these whirls called mat­ter so that I could change its de­gree of re­sis­tance to ei­ther grav­i­ta­tion or lev­i­ta­tion and thus its weight... "The Odic Ac­tiv­ity Ray will af­fect a pho­to­graphic plate or dis­in­te­grate mat­ter, depend­ing upon the wave length, which can be al­tered... It can be di­rected and fo­cused... It has been gen­er­ated to pen­e­trate 16 inches of metal, and yet not harm the hand that en­cir­cles it. "We have de­creased the weight of alu­minum, for in­stance, 20 per cent; then made it heav­ier than nor­mal. And ev­ery base metal has re­sponded to some de­gree, the change be­ing in­stan­ta­neous and per­ma­nent un­til again treated." Dr. Holling­shead re­ceived two Cana­dian patents for a dy­namo: CA145749 ("Ar­ma­ture for Dy­namos"); CA145750 ("Dy­namo-elec­tric Ma­chine"). No men­tion of the Odic Ray is made therein, but they might con­tain clues.

In 1931, Holling­shead self-pub­lished a book­let with the ti­tle, "Tri­une Broth­er­hood Project and Its Mes­sage To You : The Tri­une Broth­er­hood and How it Is Pro­posed to Use a Re­dis­cov­ered An­cient Process Known as the Odic Ray To Es­tab­lish a Great Move­ment for the Up­lift of Mankind".

To­day, circa 2017, Mankind, et al., have moved on to tyranny in­stead.

Vik­tor Greben­nikov : Cav­ity Struc­tural Ef­fect

Vik­tor S. Greben­nikov (died 2001) was a Rus­sian sci­en­tist, nat­u­ral­ist, and en­to­mol­o­gist, well-known as the dis­cov­erer of Cav­ity Struc­tural Ef­fect (CSE). In the 1990s he de­signed and built an anti-grav­i­ta­tional plat­form based on bionic prin­ci­ples found in in­sect wings, and flew it at speeds up to 25 km/min.

Greben­nikov made his dis­cov­ery in 1981 while col­lect­ing in­sects for study at the In­sti­tute of Agri­cul­tural Chem­istry:

"I was about to throw a piece of ethered cot­ton wool into the jar and then cap it, when a light lit­tle co­coon jumped up at me.

"It was oval-shaped, rather dense and non-trans­par­ent. One of the lit­tle "pris­on­ers" in the jar must have pushed it. Co­coons can't jump on their own! But the co­coon proved me wrong. It jumped up one more time, hit the glass wall and fell down. I took it out and put it into a sep­a­rate test tube. I looked at it through a binoc­u­lar mi­cro­scope at home and I have found noth­ing spe­cial about it. It was a co­coon like any other, about 3 mm long and 1.5 mm wide. Its walls felt strong to the touch as they should. But the co­coon en­er­get­i­cally jumped when lit or warmed by the sun but, it was quiet in the dark. It could jump 30mm length­wise and, what I found even more re­mark­able, up to 50mm high. As far as I could tell, it flew smoothly, al­most with­out tum­bling. No doubt, the larva of the in­sect was re­spon­si­ble for the move­ment. But it was im­pos­si­ble to see how it did it.

"Jump­ing ahead, I can tell you that the co­coon fi­nally pro­duced a male in­sect of the Ich­neu­mon fam­ily, the Bati­plectes anu­rus species. It is ben­e­fi­cial for agri­cul­ture be­cause its lar­vae par­a­sitize the al­falfa wee­vil...

Greben­nikov later found a stronger man­i­fes­ta­tion of

the bio-grav­i­ta­tional ef­fect in another in­sect, which he re­fused to iden­tify:

"Why am I not dis­clos­ing the par­tic­u­lars of my dis­cov­ery at this time? Firstly, be­cause one needs time and en­ergy for prov­ing the truth. I have nei­ther. I know how daunt­ing is this task from my own bit­ter ex­pe­ri­ence of try­ing to get recog­ni­tion for my pre­vi­ous dis­cov­er­ies, in­clud­ing such an ob­vi­ous one as the Cav­ity Struc­tures Ef­fect...

"The sec­ond rea­son for my "non-dis­clo­sure" is more ob­jec­tive. I have found these anti-grav­i­ta­tional struc­tures only in one species of Siberian in­sects. I dare not even nam­ing the class to which this in­sect be­longs, be­cause it seems to be on the verge of ex­tinc­tion and the pop­u­la­tion surge, which I had reg­is­tered back then, was pos­si­bly lo­cal and fi­nal. Now, what would be the guar­an­tee that dis­hon­est peo­ple, half com­pe­tent in bi­ol­ogy, would not rush out to ravines, mead­ows and forests to catch per­haps the very last sam­ples of this mir­a­cle of na­ture, if I were to name the genus and the species? What are the guar­an­tees that they would not plough up hun­dreds of glades and cut down dozens of forests to get to this po­ten­tially lu­cra­tive prey? There­fore, let all I have re­lated in this chap­ter and in the ad­den­dum re­main sci­ence fic­tion. May na­ture her­self never re­veal this se­cret to them...

"I was ex­am­in­ing the chitin shells of in­sects un­der my mi­cro­scope in the sum­mer of 1988 along with their pin­nate an­ten­nae, the fish-scale mi­crostruc­ture of but­ter­fly wings, iri­des­cent col­ors, and other in­ven­tions of na­ture. I be­came in­ter­ested in an amaz­ingly rhyth­mi­cal mi­crostruc­ture of one large in­sect de­tail. It was an ex­tremely well-or­dered com­po­si­tion, as though stamped out by fac­tory equip­ment ac­cord­ing to spe­cial blue­prints and cal­cu­la­tions. As I saw it, the in­tri­cate spongi­ness was clearly un­nec­es­sary ei­ther for the strength of the part, or for its dec­o­ra­tion. I have never ob­served any­thing like this un­usual mi­cro-or­na­ment ei­ther in na­ture, in tech­nol­ogy, or in art. Be­cause its struc­ture is three-di­men­sional, I have been un­able to cap­ture it in a draw­ing so far, or a pho­to­graph. Why does an in­sect need it? Be­sides, other than in flight, this struc­ture at the bot­tom of the wing case is al­ways hid­den from the eye. No one would ever see it prop­erly. Was it per­haps the wave emit­ter us­ing "my" mul­ti­ple cav­ity struc­tures ef­fect? That truly lucky sum­mer, there were very many in­sects of this species and I would cap­ture them at night. I was not able to ob­serve these in­sects nei­ther be­fore, nor later.

"I placed the small, con­cave chitin plate on the mi­cro­scope stage in or­der to again ex­am­ine its strangely star-shaped cells un­der strong mag­ni­fi­ca­tion. I again ad­mired this mas­ter­piece jew­el­work of na­ture. I was about to place a sec­ond iden­ti­cal plate with the same un­usual cell struc­ture on its un­der­side al­most pur­pose­lessly on top of the first one. But then!

"The lit­tle plate came loose from my tweez­ers, hung sus­pended above the other plate on the mi­cro­scope stage for a few sec­onds, then turned a few de­grees clock­wise and slid to the right, then turned coun­ter­clock­wise and swung and only then it abruptly fell on the desk.

"You can imag­ine what I felt at that mo­ment. When I came to my senses, I tied a few pan­els to­gether with a wire and it wasn't an easy thing to do. I suc­ceeded only when I po­si­tioned them ver­ti­cally. What I got was a multi-lay­ered chitin block and I placed it on the desk. Even a rel­a­tively large ob­ject, such as a thumb­tack, would not fall on it. Some­thing pushed it up and aside. When I at­tached the tack on top of the "block", I wit­nessed in­cred­i­ble, im­pos­si­ble things. The tack would dis­ap­pear from sight for a few mo­ments. That was when I have re­al­ized that this was no "bea­con," but some­thing en­tirely dif­fer­ent...

"Look at these pic­tures. This is my rather sim­ple de­vice in as­sem­bly. A flex­i­ble ca­ble in­side the steer­ing col­umn trans­mits the move­ment from the left han­dle to the grav­i­ta­tional lou­vers. I lift off or land by join­ing or part­ing these "wing cases"...

Ber­nays John­son: Anti-grav­ity Wave

Ber­nays John­son also fig­ured out this great mys­tery, but the se­cret was lost again af­ter his death. A tiny ar­ti­cle in Mod­ern Mechanix mag­a­zine (Jan­uary 1929) is all that re­mains to pique our cu­rios­ity:

"Ra­dio Waves Keep Air­ship Aloft -- Propellers and en­gines are not needed to fly the model air­ship of Ber­nays John­son, who is shown with his craft at the right. A pow­er­ful ra­dio wave which neu­tral­izes the pull of grav­ity is the force which keeps the ship aloft. John­son ex­per­i­mented for ten years be­fore he suc­ceeded in dis­cov­er­ing the prin­ci­ple of his anti-grav­ity waves. The ship can be con­trolled from within it­self or from the ground. It was ex­hib­ited at the re­cent Bos­ton ra­dio ex­po­si­tion."

The his­tor­i­cal ex­am­ples of­fered above seem to have ap­plied a form of en­ergy that re­mains uniden­ti­fied though widely rec­og­nized. It ap­pears to be a fun­da­men­tal cos­mic en­ergy, and peo­ple have given it many names. Rota called it "Uni­ver­sal Cur­rent"; Holling­shead named it "Odic Rays". It is oth­er­wise known as "Or­gone" (Wil­helm Re­ich), "Prana", "Chi", "Ka", "Ether", etc. What­ever it is, the stuff plays no part in con­ven­tional sci­ence and tech­nol­ogy, and the study of it is dis­dained as fringe, crack­pot, and/or hereti­cal. There has been no me­thod­i­cal, open source ex­am­i­na­tion of the glar­ing ques­tion: What The For­ni­ca­tion?

It ap­pears ob­vi­ous that some­how dur­ing the 20th cen­tury we were cheated out of an amaz­ing world of pos­si­bil­i­ties. Hope­fully some braini­acs will fig­ure this out in an open-source man­ner for the ben­e­fit of all mankind and the planet, rather than the un­just en­rich­ment of a few mil­lion psy­chopaths, ul­ti­mately cul­mi­nat­ing in mass ex­tinc­tion. At present we have lit­tle idea of what we are miss­ing, but if we some­how sur­vive our­selves for so long, per­haps some cen­tury soon we shall solve this prob­lem and get on with the fun­da­men­tal hu­man busi­ness of con­quer­ing the Uni­verse for fun and profit.


About the Au­thor: Robert A. Nel­son is a 10th grade dropout with no cre­den­tials. He es­tab­lished Rex Re­search in 1982 to ar­chive hard-to-find in­for­ma­tion about sup­pressed, dor­mant and emerg­ing tech­nolo­gies. He per­sists de­spite the seem­ing fu­til­ity of the ef­fort.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.