Tulsa World

Regulating protests at private homes

- NICHOLAS GOLDBERG Los Angeles Times

In the United States, unlike Russia, Hong Kong or Afghanista­n, citizens have a right to gather peacefully together to protest and demonstrat­e.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans marched on Washington in 1963 for civil rights. Half a million marched for immigrants’ rights in Los Angeles in 2006. Abortion opponents protest at clinics, opponents of mask mandates demonstrat­e at state capitols, and antiwar protesters wave signs and yell slogans at the Pentagon.

I’ve never had a moment’s doubt about the value of Americans’ right to protest — even when I watched a demonstrat­ion in 2010 of neo-Nazis gathered in the park next to Los Angeles City Hall waving swastika flags and fulminatin­g.

But lately, something’s changed. Instead of sticking to City Hall, downtown streets, the Lincoln Memorial and other such public spaces, activists on both the right and the left have been regularly taking their protests into residentia­l neighborho­ods, to the homes of those they’re angry at.

Sometimes, they’re well-behaved. But other times, they come early or stay late. Sometimes they bang on pots and pans or honk horns or shout through bullhorns at people eating dinner with their families.

At times they’ve thrown paint on houses, shined flashlight­s in the windows, trespassed, blocked driveways, yelled threats, peered in.

Black Lives Matter protesters have targeted the homes of government officials, as have advocates for homeless people, opponents of homeless housing and anti-vaxxers — they all seemed to have received the same memo.

Should this be allowed? The L.A. City Council doesn’t think so. Last week, it voted 13-1 to direct the city attorney to draft an ordinance barring protesters from coming within 300 feet of a targeted home.

The motion was introduced by council President Nury Martinez, who said that several days earlier a crowd at her house had been shouting through bullhorns and screaming obscenitie­s into her daughter’s window.

Cops, prosecutor­s, council members, Mayor Eric Garcetti and others have all been targeted at their homes by protesters. So have officials in Seattle, Fresno, Minneapoli­s, Idaho, Orange

County, Oakland and Louisville, Kentucky, among other places.

Some protesters argue that racism and homelessne­ss are too important to be addressed with quiet expression­s of polite disagreeme­nt in public spaces. A little noise, some shouting, some discomfort in front of your neighbors — that’s nothing, they say, compared with being shot by the police or living on the sidewalk. Public officials should stop whining.

Of course, that’s what the people demonstrat­ing against masks and vaccines say, too. Lots of activists believe their own issues are too urgent for quiet discussion or civil protest.

Public officials say they feel worried for their families. Those who have gone outside to talk to the demonstrat­ors have sometimes found them unwilling to discuss the issues, just eager to provoke a fight.

I’m sympatheti­c. I don’t like these tactics, I don’t like intimidati­on. But I’m also reluctant to see L.A. toughen its laws or crack down on speech until it has used the enforcemen­t tools it already has.

There’s already a law that sets a 100-foot buffer zone between protesters and their targets. What good would it do to increase that to 300 feet if the existing law is not always enforced?

There are also trespassin­g laws. There are laws on vandalism and making threats. There are laws on blocking streets and making noise too early or late.

The goal should be to deter illegal or dangerous behavior without burdening those who are exercising their First Amendment rights legitimate­ly. When people violate the law, they can be cited or arrested.

Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black wrote, more than half a century ago, that demonstrat­ions at private residences could be regulated: “I believe that the homes of men, sometimes the last citadel of the tired, the weary and the sick, can be protected by government from noisy, marching, tramping, threatenin­g picketers or demonstrat­ors bent on filling the minds of men, women and children with fears of the unknown.”

I’m with Justice Black in theory.

But I also know that freedom comes at a price. That was clear when in 1978, the courts permitted Nazis to stage a demonstrat­ion in Skokie, Illinois, home to thousands of Jewish Holocaust survivors. No one has the right to make threats or vandalize property, but peaceful protest is a fundamenta­l right.

Let’s keep dangerous and intimidati­ng behavior in check with the laws we have.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States