USA TODAY International Edition

Canon 70D SLR excels at autofocus

- Jefferson Graham @ jeffersong­raham USA TODAY

Digital SLRs come and go, with a great deal of hype that each new model is sharper, smaller and easier to use. Such is the groundswel­l for Canon’s new $ 1,200 70D SLR, which is shipping this week.

We got our hands on a preproduct­ion model, which we’ve been using since July, and can report that the hype is real. The camera is that good. It’s the biggest breakthrou­gh in shooting autofocus video since the introducti­on of DSLRs and the Canon 5D Mark II in 2009. The 5D ( now the Mark III) showed how a still camera could provide cinematic-like video images that looked more colorful and breathtaki­ng than anything shot on video cameras. Reason: The image sensor on the DSLRs is 20 times the size of those on video cameras, producing better quality.

The 70D’s breakthrou­gh comes in autofocus. I’ve never seen autofocus this good for shooting video — either on a still camera or a video camera.

What hasn’t improved dramatical­ly is the quality of the image. Its 1080p video looks terrific in well- lit situations, but it’s not so great in low light. More on that in a minute.

Typically with the Canon line of cameras, once the focus is set and the recording started, you couldn’t adjust the autofocus, unless you did it manually, or bought accessorie­s.

The 70D has a 20- megapixel “dual- pixel autofocus” sensor — in the past, the pixels on the image sensor were used just to capture the image, but now they also assist in focusing. For videograph­ers, this means no more pressing the shutter halfway down and being frustrated as the lens hunts for the focus point.

The promise of the 70D is quicker, more accurate autofocusi­ng, and that’s what I experience­d, both for video and stills.

There are 19 autofocus points with the 70D, which Canon says cover 80% of the viewing area. What does that mean for you? When you’re shooting a school ballet recital and the dancer is moving across the stage, video will stay in focus. When you’re shooting a baseball game using a big zoom lens for close- ups and your son is running from third base to home plate, he will probably remain in focus. With the 60D, 70D’s predecesso­r, the odds of that happening were nil.

The autofocus works great for stills, too. I used the camera at a party recently, shooting in a dark room, which is where autofocus is generally the toughest to work. On my 5D Mark III, which sells for $ 3,500, the camera hunted for focus. I switched to the 70D, and the focus came in within seconds. It worked great.

But the image quality suffered with the 70D, which does sell for a third of the price of the 5D Mark III. What I don’t like about the 70D:

As I mentioned, the image sensor is great for autofocusi­ng, but not great in low light. Anything above 1600 ISO will probably see lots of noise — little artifacts showing up that you’d rather not see.

The Wi- Fi is a step in the right direction, but very, very cumbersome to set up. It needs to be disabled in video mode. If you want to send photos via Wi- Fi and have just been shooting video, you’ll have to adjust the menu before you can start.

Canon’s got a long, long way to go to catch up to the ease of sending pictures from smartphone­s.

But at least photos on DSLRs are a whole lot sharper and crisper than smartphone photos or video; you can use zoom and interchang­eable lenses. That’s pretty cool.

 ?? JEFFERSON GRAHAM. USA TODAY ?? Canon’s 70D costs $ 1,200 for the body only and features dramatical­ly improved autofocus for video.
JEFFERSON GRAHAM. USA TODAY Canon’s 70D costs $ 1,200 for the body only and features dramatical­ly improved autofocus for video.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States