USA TODAY International Edition

Share the decision with Congress

- Scott Rigell Rep. Scott Rigell, R- Va., is a member of the House Armed Services Committee.

Evidence is mounting that the Assad regime in Syria has murdered civilians, including children, with chemical weapons. President Obama is right to focus his attention on holding the regime accountabl­e, yet his belief that he has the authority to attack Syria without first obtaining authorizat­ion from Congress is wrong.

The atrocities in Syria don’t pose an imminent threat to U. S.

That’s why, joined by a third of the House of Representa­tives, I sent a bipartisan letter to the president urging him to consult and obtain authorizat­ion from Congress before engaging U. S. forces in the Syrian civil war.

For the president to engage the U. S. military in Syria, when no direct threat to the United States exists, would violate the Constituti­on. The atrocities in Syria do not pose an imminent threat to our nation. The flexibilit­y given to the commander in chief in the War Powers Act of 1973 does not apply. And bad precedent, like the use of force in Libya, is not a substitute for constituti­onality and the rule of law.

Our first president and commander in chief, George Washington, provided this insight on the use of military force: “The Constituti­on vests the power of declaring war in Congress, therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberate­d upon the subject and authorized such a measure.”

That view was essentiall­y expressed by then- Sen. Obama in 2007 when he stated: “The president does not have power under the Constituti­on to unilateral­ly authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

Regardless of how one views the constituti­onality of the action now being contemplat­ed by the president, I sense that we are becoming callously disconnect­ed from the consequenc­es of military force. The president has characteri­zed the military operation as “limited” and “tailored.” Yet, there is nothing “limited” or “tailored” about a Tomahawk cruise missile — particular­ly if you’re on the receiving end. The launch of even one missile is a serious escalation of America’s involvemen­t in the most unstable region in the world.

For that reason, my colleagues and I, Republican­s and Democrats, are calling upon President Obama to see the wisdom and the constituti­onal necessity of sharing with Congress the heavy burden of decisions made regarding U. S. involvemen­t in the Syrian civil war.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States