USA TODAY International Edition
France stands as last big U. S. ally on missile strike
Nation’s support for action contrasts with its stance on Iraq War
PARIS On Feb. 14, 2003, French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin told members of the United Nations Security Council that taking part in the Iraq War without absolute proof of weapons of mass destruction and without a U. N. endorsement was not an option for France.
A decade later, France is the only major European ally supporting military strikes against Syria, and French President François Hollande actually seems more eager than President Obama to take action.
A French intelligence estimate released Monday alleges that the Syri- an regime launched an attack Aug. 21 involving “massive use of chemical agents” that killed at least 281 people and says Syria could carry out other strikes of a similar nature in the future.
Syria President Bashar Assad was unmoved, telling the French newspaper Le Figaro that the U. S. and France have failed to prove the claims — and warning that potential Western military strikes against Syria could ignite the Middle East “powder keg” and trigger a regional war.
Hollande has backed Obama’s call for a military strike against Assad’s government since last week.
“The chemical massacre of Damascus cannot and must not remain unpunished,” Hollande said in an interview on Friday with the newspaper Le Monde.
“There are few countries that have the capacity to inflict a sanction by the appropriate means. France is one of them. We are ready,” he said.
On Monday, the prime minister met top members of Parliament to discuss military intervention ahead of a debate in Parliament on Wednesday. The international community is watching what France will do following the defeat in the British Parliament last week of a motion on military intervention.
“I think France is committed in a way that is worrying — Paris had strongly criticized the American intervention in Iraq in 2003, which proved to be a fiasco, and in Libya, President Sarkozy had made sure he had the U. N. backing,” said Denis Bauchard, analyst at the Institut Français des Relations Internationales ( IFRI), a think tank in Paris.
“We are the only important Western country taking the U. S. side and that will lead to a certain misunderstanding in Arab opinion, a certain isolation within the European Union, and create tensions at the domestic level,” Bauchard said.
Elected president in 2012, Hollande was widely seen as a soft leader, but since then, few have called him dovish.
In January, Hollande launched a successful offensive against Islamist rebels in northern Mali. He is standing firm on military action in Syria, saying he is “determined to punish” Assad’s government.
In France, legislative approval is not required for military action, and Hollande is only obligated to alert lawmakers three days before any intervention expected to last less than four months.
Even so, Hollande is under pressure from his own party to hold a vote on military action in Parliament. Like Obama, Hollande faces legislative opposition to engagement in Syria.
A document from French intelligence was leaked to the weekly Journal du Dimanche reporting that the Syrian regime holds “several hundred tons of mustard gas” and “sarin ( gas),” the total inventory exceeding 1,000 tons of chemical agents.
Almost two- thirds of the French public do not support French military action against the Syrian regime, according to a poll published by newspaper Le Parisien.