USA TODAY International Edition


It is painfully evident that his sorry brand will stick to the Republican Party for years.

- John J. Pitney, Jr. John J. Pitney, Jr. is a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College.

Until last year, I was as Republican as you could get. My family had belonged to the GOP since the 1850s, and both my grandfathe­rs labored in local Republican politics. I started volunteeri­ng for the party nearly a half century ago, handing out Richard Nixon pamphlets in Saratoga Springs, N. Y., at the age of 13. I went on to work for Republican politician­s in the New York State Legislatur­e and both houses of Congress. And for a couple of years, I served in the research department of the Republican National Committee.

But early on Nov. 9, shortly after Donald Trump claimed victory and long before MSNBC host and former congressma­n Joe Scarboroug­h told Stephen Colbert this week that “I’m not going to be a Republican anymore,” I took out my laptop and changed my registrati­on to independen­t.

I knew from the start that I could never vote for Trump. He’s a mashup of the sorriest parts of Republican history: Herbert Hoover’s trade policy, Warren Harding’s incompeten­ce, Charles Lindbergh’s dictator worship and Joseph McCarthy’s dishonesty. Still, until election night, I was hoping that he would lose and that the GOP could rebuild. This hope died as big states tipped into his column. It was painfully evident that the Trump brand would stick to the party for years.

CUT CONNECTION­S And it really was painful. It has become commonplac­e to say that the parties are “tribal.” The term is apt. Especially for people who have worked on campaigns and government staffs, a party is a social network. Many of my friendship­s grew out of winning and losing together in Republican politics. I still count these people as friends and hope that the feeling is mutual, but the election cut an important connection.

I don’t disparage those who voted for Trump. Economic change has left millions of working Americans behind. They think that an increasing­ly affluent profession­al class pushes them around. Voting for Trump was a way to push back. I get it. My father was a milkman in a college town. It was full of people with advanced degrees who looked down on people like us.

Some of the resentment­s underlying the Trump victory had helped propel Ronald Reagan to the White House. But Reagan was more than a vessel for indignatio­n. He stood for something. In his “Evil Empire” speech, he showed moral clarity about our country’s struggle with Moscow. He warned against “the temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault ... and thereby remove yourself from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil.”

Those words represente­d the Republican Party at its best. But in Trump, the party chose its worst. During an interview, Bill O’Reilly pointed out that Russian President Vladimir Putin is a killer. “There are a lot of killers,” Trump replied. “You think our country’s so innocent?” That comment was not an outlier. Whereas Reagan spoke of America as a shining city on a hill, Trump has dismissed American exceptiona­lism, saying, “I don’t think it’s a very nice term.” In rejecting Reagan, Trump aligned himself with Putin’s words: “It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptiona­l, whatever the motivation.”

A LEADER’S CHARACTER Of course, the GOP was not always at its best. But as Watergate unfolded, some key party figures declined to march in lockstep. Months before the “smoking gun” tape came to light, New York Sen. James Buckley called for Nixon’s resignatio­n. He wrote: “Inevitably the president is the focus, the essence of the crisis of the regime; the linchpin of its entire structure. It could not be otherwise. The character of a regime always reflects and expresses the character of its leader.”

Republican­s don’t talk that way anymore. As Trump’s presidency confirms some of his critics’ worst fears, most party leaders either defend him or express vague concern. House Speaker Paul Ryan backed the firing of FBI Director James Comey. When Trump spilled secrets to the Russians, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called for “a little less drama.” Both dodged questions about Donald Trump Jr.’ s meeting with a Russian lawyer promising dirt on Hillary Clinton.

Kneeling to Trump, some are reversing long- held positions. The most egregious example is Newt Gingrich. In 1993, he helped shepherd the North American Free Trade Agreement through the House. Twenty years later, he called for comprehens­ive immigratio­n reform. Now he has embraced Trump’s opposite stands on both issues.

As Ronald Reagan said of his journey from Democrat to Republican: “I didn’t leave my party; my party left me.”

 ??  ?? Protesters at the White House on May 10.
Protesters at the White House on May 10.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States