USA TODAY International Edition

Trump orders sanctions to deter election meddling

- Deirdre Shesgreen USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump signed a sweeping executive order Wednesday to authorize U.S. sanctions on any foreign individual or country that tries to interfere in U.S. elections.

“This is intended to be a very broad effort to prevent foreign manipulati­on of the political process,” John Bolton, Trump’s national security adviser, said during a briefing Wednesday.

The move comes less than two months before the 2018 midterm elections, and just weeks after Dan Coats, Trump’s director of national intelligen­ce, warned of a “pervasive messaging campaign by Russia to try to weaken and divide the United States” before Americans go to the polls in November.

The executive order could blunt momentum in Congress for legislatio­n that would impose harsher and more direct penalties on Russia for any future election meddling.

Several senators said Wednesday that the White House order was a good first step but fell short of what’s needed and could give Trump too much wiggle room.

“While the administra­tion has yet to share the full text, an executive order that inevitably leaves the President broad discretion to decide whether to impose tough sanctions against those who attack our democracy is insufficie­nt,” said Sen Mark Warner, DVa., the top Democrat on the Senate investigat­ion into Russia.

“If we are going to actually deter Russia and others from interferin­g in our elections in the future, we need to spell out strong, clear consequenc­es, without ambiguity,” Warner said.

Coats said the new executive order is a response to Russia’s actions in the 2016 election and “to make sure that doesn’t happen again. But he said the order will apply not just to Russia but to others possible bad actors, including China, North Korea and Iran.

“We have seen signs of (meddling from) not just Russia, but from China ... from Iran and even North Korea,” Coats said. “We’re taking nothing for granted here.”

The order sets up a high-level process for the U.S. intelligen­ce community and other law enforcemen­t officials to investigat­e and evaluate possible election meddling.

First, it requires the Director of National Intelligen­ce to conduct regular assessment­s of possible election interferen­ce. And after each election, the intelligen­ce community will have 45 days to investigat­e whether there was an attempt at interferen­ce, followed by a Justice Department review.

If there is a consensus that a foreign country or other entity tried to meddle in the election, automatic sanctions would be triggered, Coats said.

Bolton said the sanctions would be imposed not just for direct actions, such as hacking into election systems, but also for distributi­on of propaganda and disinforma­tion.

Russia spent millions of dollars trying to sow division and discord in the 2016 presidenti­al race, using Facebook and other social media platforms, among other tactics.

Warner and others said Congress should still move forward with legislatio­n. One bill that has broad support, crafted by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., would mandate tough sanctions on major sectors of the Russian economy, including finance, energy, and defense companies.

It would also target senior Russian political figure and oligarchs close to Putin, barring them from the United States and freezing their assets.

“There is no question that protecting our elections from foreign interferen­ce is one of the most pressing issues facing our country today,” Rubio and Van Hollen said in a joint statement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States