USA TODAY International Edition

Midterms: The divides are redder, bluer, deeper

Results solidify the differences between parties

- Susan Page Columnist

WASHINGTON — Divided we stand. Red states got redder. Blue districts got bluer. And the chasm between Republican­s and Democrats got deeper.

The hotly fought midterm elections delivered control of the House to Democrats, increased the Senate majority for Republican­s and gave each side some of the gubernator­ial victories they wanted most.

In day-after news conference­s Wednesday, both President Donald Trump and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi talked glowingly of the possibilit­y of bipartisan cooperatio­n on a range of issues.

But that may prove to be a distant prospect. In Tuesday’s elections, divisions between the two parties were sharply drawn based not only on ideology but also on race, gender, age, education and geography. The political exploitati­on of those divisions is one factor that has contribute­d to the growing unwillingn­ess by some partisans to see the other side as warranting respect and cooperatio­n.

The two parties reflect two Americas that have conflicting perspectiv­es and priorities. That was apparent in election returns and exit polls of voters sponsored by a media consortium including ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News and NBC. Here’s how voters are sorting out:

By education: White workingcla­ss voters were once part of the Democratic coalition, and white college-educated voters in the past tended to vote Republican. Now Trump has drawn whites without a college degree to the GOP and helped propel those who have a college diploma to the Democrats. In the last midterm election, in 2014, those better-educated whites voted for Republican congressio­nal candidates by 16 percentage points. On Tuesday, they backed Democrats by 10 points, 55 to 44 percent.

In contrast, white men without a college diploma supported Republican­s by 31 points, 65-34 percent.

By age: The rising generation, those 18 to 29 years old, supported Democratic congressio­nal candidates by 12 points in 2014. That preference has become much more pronounced. This time, they backed Democrats by a yawning 35 points.

By gender: Women voted for Democratic congressio­nal candidates by 60-39 percent. The most significant swing was among college-educated suburban women. In the 2014 midterm, they supported Republican­s by two points. On Tuesday, they backed Democrats by 23 points, 61-38 percent.

By geography: Three of the Senate Democrats that Republican managed to oust were all in more rural states, Indiana, Missouri and North Dakota. Meanwhile, Democrats flipped House seats in suburbs, even in some of the nation’s reddest states, including in suburban areas around Charleston, S.C., Kansas City, Oklahoma City and Salt Lake City.

Congress returns to Washington next week for a post-election session. On the table will be one of the most pressing issues — the need to fund the government or risk a partial shutdown — and one of the most controvers­ial ones, the debate over money for Trump’s signature proposal to build a wall along the southern border.

The partisan divisions are likely to be in full display, a prospect that seems to be no surprise to voters. There was bipartisan agreement on that in the exit polls: Nearly eight in 10 said that Americans are becoming more politicall­y divided.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States