USA TODAY International Edition

Why Biden worked with segregatio­nists

It was then the only way to advance civil rights

- Ross K. Baker Ross K. Baker is a distinguis­hed professor of political science at Rutgers University and a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributo­rs.

After hearing Sen. Kamala Harris attack former Vice President Joe Biden’s civil rights record, I felt a little bit like the Vietnam War veteran who feels the need to defend his role in the unpopular war by saying, “You weren’t there; you don’t know what it was like.”

I had a ringside seat at the Senate in the late 1970s while writing my book “Friend and Foe in the U.S. Senate.” I can attest that had Harris been serving at the time, she’d have been as ingratiati­ng with Southern segregatio­nists from her own party as she accuses Biden of being back then.

Fifty years ago, the South still reigned supreme in the Senate, and the chairmansh­ips of the major committees were dominated by men whose racial views are scarcely imaginable today: Richard Russell of Georgia on Armed Services, James Eastland of Mississipp­i on Judiciary, and John McClellan of Arkansas on Appropriat­ions.

Even now, committee chairs are formidable figures who determine whether a bill will get a hearing and, if so, how many witnesses will appear for each side or even whether any witnesses at all will be allowed. Fifty years ago it was worse, with chairmen dominating not only the full committees but their many subcommitt­ees as well. As a liberal Democrat, you had to find a way around them by deference, flattery or, at times, acceding to their retrograde attitudes on race and their appalling views of African Americans.

By humoring these dinosaurs, it was possible to achieve objectives not otherwise attainable in the face of their opposition. Rebecca Lubot’s recently completed doctoral dissertati­on on the origins of the 25th Amendment on presidenti­al succession recounts the adroit maneuverin­g by liberal Sen. Birch Bayh of Indiana to become chairman of a subcommitt­ee that had the power to initiate constituti­onal changes. It was only his relentless cultivatio­n of the segregatio­nist Eastland that allowed this historic amendment to be ratified.

The old Democratic bulls of the Senate were acutely aware of the impassione­d attacks on them by their northern Democratic colleagues at election time. Joseph Clark of Pennsylvan­ia, running for his first Senate term, had vowed to his constituen­ts that his principal goal would be to depose Eastland as Judiciary Committee chairman.

As Clark told me in a 1979 interview, he was gripped by second thoughts about the harshness of his attacks on Eastland and fearful of being a pariah on the committee. Advised to make peace with the chairman, he entered Eastland’s office and began his apology. But he was cut short by Eastland waving his cigar and assuring Clark, “Don’t worry Joe, I know what it takes to get elected in Pennsylvan­ia.”

Biden faced similar obstacles. He quickly sized up what it took to circumvent or humor these cranky old men whose racial views were repugnant, but who determined whether you could move racial equality ahead, even incrementa­lly.

Even the redoubtabl­e Lyndon Johnson assiduousl­y courted the Dixie troglodyte­s during his years as Democratic leader of the Senate. But upon becoming vice president under John F. Kennedy, Johnson came to believe that age and disability were reducing the clout of the Southern committee chairs. According to Sen. Eugene McCarthy, Johnson once cornered a group of liberal colleagues in the Capitol and told them: “Dick Russell has throat cancer, Russell Long (of Louisiana) is a drunk,” and they were no longer able to block civil rights legislatio­n.

The battle had yet to be won when Biden entered the Senate at age 30 in 1973. He had to find a way around these autocrats — by sweet-talking them or accommodat­ing their last-ditch obstacles — to get the opportunit­y for even the most limited civil rights gains.

This was not evidence of collaborat­ion with the enemies of civil rights or an abandonmen­t of principle, Sen. Harris. It was, with no small amount of resignatio­n, laying the groundwork for the landmark civil rights advances of the future.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States