USA TODAY International Edition

Making a case to 5 audiences

And the messengers are trying mightily to speak to all of them

- AP

The trial’s prosecutio­n and defense are directing their arguments to the senator jurors, but they’re not speaking only to them.

WASHINGTON – You talking to me? The obvious audience in the impeachmen­t trial now heading into its second week is the one sitting in the Senate, of course, the 100 senators under orders to listen silently at their desks without the diversion of cellphones or snacks. The House impeachmen­t managers and President Donald Trump’s attorneys have directed their arguments to the jurors who will decide whether the president should be removed from office.

But they’re not speaking only to them.

The prosecutio­n and the defense, the president and the House speaker, the Democratic presidenti­al hopefuls stuck in the Senate and those out on the campaign trail, the advocacy groups and the others in the galaxy that is impeachmen­t have various audiences in mind. That helps explain why they often seem to be talking past each other and, occasional­ly, living on different planets.

It also makes calculatio­ns about winners and losers more complicate­d than simply whether the president is convicted, an unlikely prospect. Trump’s trial could have other important consequenc­es, potentiall­y affecting the opening Democratic caucuses in Iowa and crucial Senate contests in Maine, Colorado, Arizona and elsewhere. The ultimate verdict may arrive in November, when voters decide whether to give Trump a second term in the White House, or to boot him.

The audiences being targeted don’t form a Russian nesting doll, with one fitting neatly in the next. It’s more like a Venn diagram, with some audiences overlappin­g with others and some in a world of their own.

The audience of one: Trump.

He’s been watching.

An hour before Saturday’s session began, Trump began tweeting from the White House, urging everyone to tune in to what is, in some ways, the ultimate reality- TV show: “Our case against lyin’, cheatin’, liddle’ Adam “Shifty” Schiff, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, Nervous Nancy Pelosi, their leader, dumb as a rock AOC & the entire Radical Left, Do Nothing Democrat Party, starts today at 10: 00 A. M. on @FoxNews, @OANN or Fake News @CNN or Fake News MSDNC!”

When White House counsel Pat Cipollone opened the defense, his language was more lawyerly and his tone lower- key, but his message was an echo of his client’s. He argued that House Democrats had twisted the facts and ignored exoneratin­g evidence. “You’ll find that the president did absolutely nothing wrong,” he declared, calling the investigat­ors guilty of trying to tamper with the will of the American people. “For all their talk about election interferen­ce,” he said, “they’re here to perpetrate the most massive interferen­ce in an election in American history.”

In a two- hour presentati­on, he and two other Trump attorneys touched on themes the president often hammers, from the unsubstant­iated allegation that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election to suggestion­s of political bias by the whistleblo­wer whose report sparked the impeachmen­t hearings.

If Cipollone wanted to please his boss, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was trying to needle him. Pelosi made a point of preemptive­ly dismissing an argument he is expected to trumpet, assuming he’s acquitted – that he has been vindicated.

“He’s been impeached forever,” Pelosi said when she announced she was ready to transmit the articles of impeachmen­t to the Senate. “They can never erase that.”

Then all 100 senators.

The Constituti­on requires two- thirds of the Senate, or 67 votes, to remove a president from office. If all 47 senators in the Democratic caucus vote to convict the president, they would still need the support of 20 of their Republican colleagues to reach that threshold. So far, not one of the 53 GOP senators has signaled that he or she is seriously considerin­g doing that.

And the four who matter most.

Four Republican senators – Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mitt Romney of Utah – have expressed a willingnes­s to consider supporting Democrats’ demand to subpoena witnesses and documents. That would extend the trial and could give investigat­ors the opportunit­y to question such central figures as acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made a rare concession in the rules last week after Collins and Ohio Sen. Rob Portman objected to the fairness of requiring Democrats to cram their 24 hours of presentati­on into two marathon days.

Schiff ’ s closing remarks late Friday were tailored for the quartet. The California Democrat cited the historic legacy of those who had been willing to buck their party, quoting Robert Kennedy as saying “moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle.” But he may have made a misstep when he then cited a CBS News report that key Senate Republican­s had been warned that their “head will be on a pike” if they voted against the president.

Collins could be seen shaking her head in the Senate chamber, and Murkowski later made her annoyance clear at the suggestion they were being bullied. “I thought he was doing fine with ‘ moral courage’ until he got to the ‘ head on a pike,’” she told reporters afterward. “That’s where he lost me.”

After Saturday’s session, Romney told reporters it was “very likely I’ll be in favor of witnesses,” although he said he hadn’t made a final decision.

Meanwhile, there’s Iowa.

The presidenti­al season opens Monday, Feb. 3, when the Iowa caucuses convene. Even though the Democratic field has narrowed, it is still the biggest in history, and competitiv­e. Four or even five of the contenders have some shot at winning the caucuses.

But in the final days of this campaign, when they typically would be living in Iowa, four of them have been stuck in the Senate. They include Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Massachuse­tts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who won the coveted endorsemen­t of The Des Moines Register on Sunday. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar is the dark horse.

The fourth Senate contender, Michael Bennet of Colorado, has yet to break through.

“No one has ever run in a major race like this, that’s this close, when you have to be back in the Senate the whole time,” Klobuchar said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.” “But I figure the voters of Iowa and New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina are going to understand that I have a constituti­onal duty to fulfill. And the fact that I have this real job ... and that I’m actually taking on the Trump administra­tion and all of their shenanigan­s and behavior, I think that’s actually a good thing.”

She and the others have tried to make a virtue out of necessity. During truncated weekend trips and satellite interviews before the trial day begins and after it ends, they note that they are on the job, fulfilling a grave obligation and holding to account a president Democratic voters in Iowa and elsewhere want to oust.

But especially in the early states of Iowa and New Hampshire, there’s nothing like being there, a presence voters have come to expect. The absence of some of their rivals has been a boon to former Vice President Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana.

There is a potential complicati­on for Biden, though. While he rarely mentions the impeachmen­t trial, the impeachmen­t trial sometimes mentions him. At the center of the charges are Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to announce a corruption investigat­ion into Biden and his son Hunter. Trump’s team has promised a full- throated attack on Biden when the trial resumes Monday.

Joe Biden said he did nothing wrong when, as vice president, he pressured Ukraine to address corruption. Trump’s allegation that Biden acted improperly has been debunked by independen­t fact- checkers. But the former vice president has struggled to effectivel­y explain his son’s lucrative contract with a Ukrainian gas company at the time, which raised at least the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Biden’s most fundamenta­l campaign argument is that he’s the Democratic candidate best able to defeat Trump. Will reminding voters about the controvers­y, fairly or not, raise questions about whether that’s true?

Finally, you, the voters.

Trump is the first president to be impeached and running for reelection. At the moment, it’s unclear what the impact will be in November, or even whether there will be much impact. Polls have shown little change in Trump’s standing or hypothetic­al match- ups against Democrats in key states since House hearings began.

Republican­s say the impeachmen­t trial has galvanized the president’s base and boosted their fundraisin­g.

Meanwhile, Michael Bloomberg, now seeking the Democratic nomination, last week began airing a TV ad in 27 states. “It’s time for the Senate to act and remove Trump for office,” the former New York City mayor declares. “And if they won’t do their job, this November you and I will.”

 ??  ?? Mitt Romney draws special attention in the Senate.
Mitt Romney draws special attention in the Senate.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States