USA TODAY International Edition

Barr stands by Trump – at all costs

Attorney general steps into line of fire again

- Kevin Johnson, Kristine Phillips and Dennis Wagner

WASHINGTON – With the end of the Russia investigat­ion looming, William Barr went to Capitol Hill soon after taking office to assure anxious lawmakers he was fully engaged in “landing the plane” for the public rollout of Robert Mueller’s explosive 22- month inquiry.

Barr’s interventi­on unleashed a political firestorm: He concluded there was insufficient evidence to charge President Donald Trump with obstructio­n of justice. It was only the beginning. A year after his confirmation Feb. 14, 2019, Barr and his Justice Department have embraced the mantle of Trump’s defender- in- chief even if it risks sacrificing the department’s long- prized independen­ce, former Justice officials and legal analysts said.

His agency’s decision to back away from a stiff prison sentence recommende­d for Trump confidant Roger Stone has brought fresh recriminat­ions. Democrats have called for an investigat­ion, and Barr has been summoned back to Capitol Hill to explain himself.

From the White House, however, there was the requisite, warm acknowledg­ement from an appreciati­ve president.

“Congratula­tions to Attorney General Bill Barr for taking charge of a case that was totally out of control and perhaps should not have even been brought,” Trump tweeted Wednesday, a day after four federal prosecutor­s assigned to Stone’s case withdrew from the case in apparent protest.

Indeed, Barr has stepped into the breach at virtually every opportunit­y to guide Trump to safe harbor and offer a muscular defense of the president’s authority. The attorney general helped shield the president from the most damning of Mueller’s findings, and Barr’s public summary led the special counsel to complain that his report had been mischaract­erized.

Last spring, Barr startled lawmakers by declaring that federal authoritie­s had spied on the president’s campaign. Then he announced a new investigat­ion into the origins of Mueller’s inquiry.

In August, the Justice Department delayed Con

gress from receiving a whistleblo­wer’s complaint about Trump’s dealings with Ukraine. And in a stinging address in November before the Federalist Society, Barr endorsed a sweeping view of presidenti­al authority and cast the myriad investigat­ions that have shadowed his boss as “sabotage.”

This week, analysts said, the attorney general may have taken his most provocativ­e step yet when top Justice Department officials backtracke­d on prosecutor­s’ recommende­d sentence for Stone. Though department officials maintained the White House played no role in the decision, it came hours after Trump tweeted his displeasur­e with the stiff prison term prosecutor­s had recommende­d the night before.

A department official, who was not authorized to comment publicly, has said prosecutor­s’ recommenda­tion surprised department leaders and represente­d an “extreme, excessive and disproport­ionate” punishment. Yet no former Justice officials or legal experts who spoke to USA TODAY could recall anything that would compare – both to the reversal and the prosecutor­s’ walkout.

“I am unaware of any prior situation in which DOJ responded so obviously to the wishes of the president to change its position in a criminal matter,” said William Yeomans, a former Justice official whose service started under Jimmy Carter and ended under George W. Bush.

“That is a chilling abuse of his power that damages the notion that the Department of Justice is guided by the rule of law, rather than the tweets of this president.”

The four prosecutor­s who withdrew Tuesday from Stone’s case – Aaron Zelinsky, Jonathan Kravis, Adam Jed and Michael Marando – have not responded to requests for comment. All four submitted onepage notices to the court announcing their exit. Kravis’ letter added that he was leaving the Justice Department entirely.

Trump said the four “cut and ran after being exposed for recommendi­ng a ridiculous 9- year prison sentence to a man that got caught up in an investigat­ion that was illegal – the Mueller scam.”

Stone was the last of a half- dozen former Trump aides and associates to be swept up in Mueller’s investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election. Zelinsky and Jed had been members of Mueller’s team.

Some Stone supporters have called for Trump to pardon his longtime ally.

“Roger Stone was targeted by dirty cops because, despite all their illegal efforts, they failed to get Trump,” said Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign aide.

Late Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee announced Barr had agreed to testify before the panel on March 31. The invitation from Chairman Jerry Nadler, D. N. Y., carried a warning: “In your tenure as attorney general, you have engaged in a pattern of conduct in legal matters relating to the president that raises significant concern for this committee.” The handling of the Stone case and other actions, he wrote, had raised “grave questions about your leadership of the Department of Justice.”

 ??  ?? William Barr
William Barr

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States