USA TODAY International Edition

Our view: With virus raging, it'd be crazy to kill Obamacare

-

In the time of coronaviru­s, it may be difficult to find things to be thankful for. But we know of one: the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

Highly controvers­ial, though it should not be, and the subject of much emotion, though it should not be, the law is pretty much solely responsibl­e for approximat­ely 26 million people, or about 8% of the population, having health insurance today. And, oh yes, it turned 10 years old this week.

The law means fewer people showing up at emergency rooms because they have nowhere else to go. It means more people getting medical advice that could help them avoid contractin­g the coronaviru­s. It provides considerab­le comfort to Americans who have plenty of other things to worry about.

Millions of workers are losing their jobs — and often their employer- provided health coverage — because of the pandemic. It’s more important than ever that they be able to find insurance, regardless of preexistin­g conditions, on the Obamacare marketplac­es or through the law’s expansion of Medicaid. The ACA gives them a safety net.

While the HealthCare. gov window for acquiring coverage in 2020 ended in December, a one- time enrollment period can, and should, be opened now to allow individual­s to sign up. That would help stabilize insurance markets and prevent premiums from spiking.

The 11 states that manage their own health insurance exchanges have already done so. The main insurance lobbying organizati­on and the Republican governor of New Hampshire, Chris Sununu, are among those calling for this to be done nationwide.

Not everyone, however, shares this rosy view of the ACA. The Trump administra­tion and most Republican­s still favor abolishing the law, throwing millions of people off the ranks of the insured. They mount this campaign while blithely referring to replacemen­t plans that do not exist. Eagerly, they anticipate that the Supreme Court will do what they themselves could not do and terminate the law.

Their effort began even before Donald Trump’s election, with multiple failed votes to repeal the law in Congress, and two efforts to kill it in court, one of which fell a vote shy in the Supreme Court.

Since Trump became president, Republican­s have tried again unsuccessf­ully to repeal the law, but they managed to get rid of one key provision, a requiremen­t that all Americans purchase health coverage. Now the law’s opponents are back in court, arguing that because the individual mandate was eliminated, the courts must condemn the rest of the law.

The mere act of eliminatin­g the individual mandate looks pretty stupid in light of today’s pandemic. U. S. officials are now telling people to shut down their businesses, work from home, even stay inside — and we couldn’t ask citizens to make our health care system more robust?

Officials were worried about the “free rider” financial burden on hospitals when just a couple of years ago they said, in effect, go ahead and be public charges if you get sick.

Last year, the Congressio­nal Budget Office estimated that the repeal of this one provision would cause the ranks of the uninsured to rise by 5 million by 2029. Some of this has likely already taken place.

When someone who decides not to buy insurance shows up at the emergency room with the coronaviru­s or some other illness, guess who ends up paying the bill? Everyone else, in the form of higher premiums and tax dollars. It’s the opposite of personal responsibi­lity.

The Affordable Care Act is not some socialist plot but a sound ( though hardly perfect) way to expand coverage, reduce costs and, yes, deal with public health crises. Its basic concept of Americans being required to buy coverage from insurers who were required to sell it came from the conservati­ve Heritage Foundation in a 1989 paper called, “Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans.”

In fact, 17 Republican­s ( and three Democrats) turned the Heritage plan into a bill in 1994, known as the HEART Act that they offered as an alternativ­e to a plan offered by the Clinton administra­tion.

Since President Barack Obama essentiall­y borrowed the plan, Republican­s have done their best to demonize the law and try to destroy it, while denying their own parentage.

There’s just one word for this given the public health threat: insane.

 ??  ?? Treating patients arriving by lifeboats in Miami Beach, Florida, from a cruise ship Thursday. DAVID SANTIAGO/ AP
Treating patients arriving by lifeboats in Miami Beach, Florida, from a cruise ship Thursday. DAVID SANTIAGO/ AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States