USA TODAY International Edition

Time to prioritize scarce vaccinatio­ns

Defer those under 75 who’ve had COVID- 19

- Dr. Marc Siegel Dr. Marc Siegel, a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributo­rs and a Fox News medical correspond­ent, is a professor of medicine and medical director of Doctor Radio at NYU Langone Health. His latest book, “COVID: the Politics of Fear and t

With the coronaviru­s pandemic showing no sign of slowing down, multiple mutations to its core proteins are inevitable. Those variants that lead to a more transmissi­ble virus offer a survival advantage and will soon predominat­e. While there is nothing unusual about this when it comes to new viruses, it is more common the more widespread the virus — and it does lead to a race against time.

But is there enough time to beat down this virus before a variant emerges and predominat­es that is resistant to the very vaccine intended to prevent it? And will this variant require re- engineerin­g of the vaccines we do have?

The answers to these crucial questions remain unknown.

Meanwhile, we need to do everything we can to slow the spread by masking, distancing, limiting gatherings and travel, and vaccinatin­g as many as possible. Our vaccines ( only two approved so far in the United States) are a limited resource, and production, distributi­on and administra­tion are a huge priority that will need to involve hospitals, pharmacies, doctor’s offices and a massive vaccinatio­n program by the federal government.

Vaccinatin­g everyone 65 and older will do a lot to take the burden off our hospitals and slow the death rate dramatical­ly. One thing we can do to help in the fight is to remove from the target group, at least for the time being, those who have had COVID- 19 and recovered from it — excluding those 75 and older, where immunity is less certain once a person has experience­d COVID- 19.

My parents are in their mid- 90s and recovered from COVID- 19 last spring. They received the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine in Florida this week, as Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, suggested to me they should during a recent radio interview on SiriusXM.

But there is little reason to doubt that the virus itself provides extensive and durable immunity, especially in people younger than my parents, both because of the extremely low reinfectio­n rate, as well as the emerging scientific literature suggesting that natural immunity after infection ( neutralizi­ng antibodies as well as T- cells) lasts for several months if not years.

This means that most people who have recovered from COVID- 19 should not be vaccinated right now.

We must prioritize the vaccine for those who haven’t had it. Because the real number of cases could be two to three times what has been reported, all vaccinatio­n centers should be reviewing antibody tests before administer­ing the vaccine.

It is a simple blood test, and though not 100% accurate, it’s an indication of prior COVID- 19. Patients with antibodies should not be at the front of the line to receive the scarce vaccine.

When we give out vaccines, just as we must prioritize health care and other front- line workers because of contacts with possible coronaviru­s patients as well as those with preexistin­g conditions, including obesity and diabetes, at the same time we must put off vaccinatin­g those who have already had COVID- 19.

By spring, we should hopefully have a more specific test to determine immunity. Any such test would include a measuremen­t of what are known as “neutralizi­ng antibodies,” which bind to the spike protein of the virus and keep it from infecting your cells.

With this and other tests, we will be able to determine with greater accuracy who needs the vaccine and who doesn’t, and how long any immunity you have will last.

 ?? LM OTERO/ AP ?? COVID- 19 vaccinatio­n center on Wednesday in Dallas.
LM OTERO/ AP COVID- 19 vaccinatio­n center on Wednesday in Dallas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States