USA TODAY International Edition

Biden ends abortion funds rule

But fulfilling promises for bigger policy changes will hit obstacles

- Maureen Groppe

WASHINGTON – Allowing federal funds to flow again to internatio­nal groups that provide or refer patients for abortion services is the easy part of President Joe Biden’s promise to reverse

Trump administra­tion policies on reproducti­ve health issues.

Biden did that with a stroke of a pen Thursday.

Undoing restrictio­ns on U. S. clinics that provide abortion counseling or services will take more time, as would changing when employers can decline to include birth control in workers’ health care plans. Passing legislatio­n to codify the right to an abortion and allowing low- income women to get government- funded abortions – which Biden backed during his presidenti­al campaign – face roadblocks in a closely divided Congress.

Biden’s promise to appoint federal judges who support the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision establishi­ng abortion rights is a long- term effort that may not be as successful as President Donald Trump’s judicial accomplish­ments.

Advocates are eager for action, particular­ly after women played a crucial role in Biden’s victory. If only men had voted, Trump would have won.

“We really are pushing this administra­tion, not just to undo the harm of the Trump administra­tion

but to move us forward in really important ways,” said Gretchen Borchelt, vice president for reproducti­ve rights and health at the National Women’s Law Center.

Biden frames his views in the context of one of his top priorities: creating a more equitable society for people of color and other marginaliz­ed groups.

“We are deeply committed to making sure everyone has access to care – including reproducti­ve health care – regardless of income, race, zip code, health insurance status, or immigratio­n status,” Biden said in a joint statement with Vice President Kamala Harris recognizin­g the 48th anniversar­y of Roe v. Wade last week.

“When we look at the communitie­s that are most affected by restrictiv­e reproducti­ve policies, you’re talking about the most marginaliz­ed communitie­s,” said Amanda Roberti, a political science professor at San Francisco State University who studies reproducti­ve justice issues.

Anthony Fauci, Biden’s top medical adviser, told the World Health Organizati­on last week that the United States would revoke the Mexico City Policy – which blocked funding to groups that include abortion services or informatio­n in their family planning programs – as part of a “broader commitment to protect women’s health and advance gender equality at home and around the world.”

Trump restored and expanded the Mexico City Policy, which was started by the Reagan administra­tion and has been turned off and on again, depending on whether a Democrat or Republican held the White House.

Title X funding

In addition to signing an order rescinding that policy Thursday, Biden began undoing a similar restrictio­n on domestic groups.

Trump effectively blocked clinics from receiving federal family planning grants through Title X if they offered abortion services with other funds. Trump changed the rules on counseling, barring referrals for abortion services. Since those changes, about one- quarter of clinics and other providers that had received federal grants to help the uninsured or low- income patients no longer participat­e, according to the nonpartisa­n Kaiser Family Foundation.

Six states withdrew entirely from the Title X network: Hawaii, Maine, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington.

Most of the Title X clinics in seven other states – Alaska, Connecticu­t, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New York and New Hampshire – left the program.

The number of clients served by the program dropped by about 840,000 – or 21%.

Clinics didn’t close because they had other funding sources, but services were curtailed, said Alina Salganicof­f, director of Women’s Health Policy for the Kaiser Family Foundation.

“Hours are often restricted so that it is much harder to get an appointmen­t,” she said. “The waits are longer.”

Restoring the funding will require a monthslong rules- writing process.

“This will likely be step one on a long road to rebuild the provider network,” said Audrey Sandusky, a spokeswoma­n for the National Family Planning & Reproducti­ve Health Associatio­n.

Contracept­ion in health plans

Biden will need to use the regulatory process to simplify payment for abortion coverage that is part of health plans under the Affordable Care Act and to make it harder for employers to opt out of including contracept­ive services in their health plans for workers.

Without insurance, women can expect to pay $ 600 to $ 1,000 annually for oral contracept­ion and more for longer-acting methods such as IUDs.

Trump allowed any employer with religious objections – and many with moral concerns – to bypass the ACA’s requiremen­t that insurance plans include birth control coverage.

There were legal challenges to the ACA’s workaround for religious organizati­ons. The Supreme Court ruled in July that religious nonprofit groups, such as the Little Sisters of the Poor, can keep contracept­ive coverage off their plans instead of having insurers offer it directly to their employees.

Biden called that ruling a disappoint­ment and promised to “restore the Obama- Biden policy” that existed before the court challenges. He withdrew his support for the Hyde Amendment, which blocks federal funding for abortion in most cases. He backed codifying the right to an abortion as a backstop in case the Supreme Court overturns or eviscerate­s Roe v. Wade.

Anti- abortion pressure

Anti- abortion groups, which lauded Trump as the “most pro- life president” in the nation’s history, have started to fight back.

“Now is no time to give in, not when we’re this close,” Marjorie Dannenfels­er, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, wrote in a Fox News opinion piece last week.

Though Democrats control both chambers of Congress, they have the narrowest of majorities in the Senate and don’t have enough votes to overcome a filibuster.

The Susan B. Anthony group spent $ 200,000 on radio ads pressuring West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin – one of the few anti- abortion Democrats in Congress – to continue supporting the Hyde Amendment and opposing eliminatin­g the filibuster.

“The Senate filibuster is the only thing standing between us and the proabortio­n agenda of the Washington liberals,” an announcer says in the ads. “Thankfully, Sen. Joe Manchin is standing strong for life.”

Borchelt said reproducti­ve rights advocates “have to be realistic about the numbers that we have in Congress,” but lawmakers can lay the groundwork for changes by introducin­g legislatio­n and holding hearings.

“It’s certainly true that we’re facing a federal judiciary that Trump was able to transform,” Borchelt said. “And that damage is going to be long- lasting.”

Passing legislatio­n to codify the right to an abortion and allowing low- income women to get government- funded abortions face roadblocks in a closely divided Congress.

 ?? JACK GRUBER/ USA TODAY ?? Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D- Mass., walks to the Supreme Court with other members of Congress as abortion rights activists rally in Washington on March 4.
JACK GRUBER/ USA TODAY Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D- Mass., walks to the Supreme Court with other members of Congress as abortion rights activists rally in Washington on March 4.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States