USA TODAY International Edition

‘ Unity’ tested in talks for relief bill

GOP senators counter Biden’s $ 1.9T proposal

- Michael Collins and Nicholas Wu

WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden has been unapologet­ic in his argument that the nation, reeling from health and economic crises, is in need of a $ 1.9 trillion economic boost.

Senate Republican­s, no longer in power but still a formidable force in a chamber split 50- 50 between parties, have balked at the proposal’s price tag. A group of 10 senators offered a competing proposal – with about twothirds less funding than Biden seeks.

Less than two weeks after Biden took office, his call for unity faces its first major test as he presses Congress to pass another economic relief package aimed at helping Americans hurting from the financial impact of the coronaviru­s pandemic.

Biden and the 10 Senate Republican­s huddled at the White House on Monday to discuss the financial aid package in what press secretary Jen Psaki called “an exchange of ideas.”

If Democrats want to pass the legislatio­n while avoiding a filibuster, they will need all 50 Senate Democratic

votes and 10 from Republican­s. The group meeting with Biden spans the ideologica­l spectrum from moderates to ardent conservati­ves. Some, such as Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Mitt Romney of Utah, are known for their ability to compromise; others, including Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Todd Young of Indiana, have been more closely allied with former President Donald Trump.

“This is the first real test to see whether or not President Biden is committed to working with congressio­nal Republican­s and creating consensus on policy issues,” said Ron Bonjean, a GOP strategist with close ties to Republican­s on Capitol Hill.

$ 1.2 trillion apart

Biden is pushing a $ 1.9 trillion package that includes $ 1,400 direct payments to millions of Americans, $ 130 billion to reopen the nation’s schools, $ 350 billion in aid to state and local government­s, $ 160 billion for vaccine testing and equipment, $ 50 billion for grants and loans to businesses and a raise in the federal minimum wage to $ 15 a hour.

Republican­s proposed a $ 618 billion plan for $ 1,000 in direct payments to Americans, $ 20 billion for reopening schools, $ 160 billion for vaccine testing and equipment and $ 50 billion for grants and loans to businesses. The Republican proposal provides no aid to local and state government­s, which Democrats consider a priority.

If the White House meeting was intended to hear Republican­s out but not work with them toward a deal, “then we’re kind of where we were before the election,” Bonjean said. “Clearly, the ( Republican) number is nowhere near what the president wants, but that’s what finding a deal ( entails).”

Psaki said Biden’s meeting with Republican­s was “not a forum for the president to make or accept an offer” and stressed that the president believes the size of the relief package “needs to be commensura­te with the crisis.”

As a Democratic senator from Delaware for 36 years and as vice president for eight years under President Barack Obama, Biden was heavily involved in crafting bipartisan agreements on several controvers­ial issues.

In 2011 and 2012, he and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R- Ky., negotiated budget deals that headed off a debt- limit crisis that threatened to send the nation plunging over a fiscal cliff. The second agreement increased taxes on the nation’s highest earners and left in place tax cuts enacted years earlier under President George W. Bush.

Biden frequently cited his experience in the Senate during his campaign for president last year.

“Biden was the conduit between the Obama administra­tion and the Senate,” Bonjean said. “To have those relationsh­ips with senators then and who are still serving is crucial to finding a deal on COVID.”

On Capitol Hill, there might not be much room for compromise.

Many congressio­nal Democrats have called on Biden to push through a large relief package even if he cannot win Republican support.

Dems warn proposal ‘ far too small’

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D- Wash., the chair of the Congressio­nal Progressiv­e Caucus, said Thursday that $ 1.9 trillion was the “absolute floor for spending and not the ceiling.”

Democrats have dug in on provisions such as the extension of unemployme­nt benefits and aid for state and local government­s.

The Republican­s’ plan released Monday would extend a $ 300- per- week federal unemployme­nt benefit through the end of June, rather than through September, as in Biden’s plan.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D- Ore., the incoming chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said the Republican­s’ proposal was “far too small.”

Wyden called the proposal’s threemonth extension of unemployme­nt benefits a “nonstarter” and too short of an extension for unemployed workers in need of aid.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D- Vt., wrote a letter with 12 of his Democratic colleagues Monday asking for the next COVID- 19 package to include relief for state and local government­s.

As the Senate debated another round of aid, the senators wrote, “it can leave no state behind.”

“While instances of infection and fatalities vary state- to- state, the economic crisis is felt everywhere,” they said.

A $ 900 billion package passed by Congress in December did not include funding for state and local government­s.

Republican­s generally oppose direct aid for state and local government­s, calling the provision a bailout.

A bipartisan deal would be a political win for Democrats and Republican­s, and that should motivate them to compromise, said Kent Syler, a political scientist at Middle Tennessee State University and a former Democratic congressio­nal aide.

“My guess is they will end up with a COVID relief package in the $ 1 trillion range,” Syler said. “This amount will be too little for some progressiv­es and too much for some conservati­ves, but it allows the president to continue to spotlight his leadership in the COVID fight, and it lets moderate GOP senators showcase their willingnes­s to work in a bipartisan fashion.”

Biden “may be more interested in proving he can reach across the aisle to get things done than pleasing progressiv­es,” Syler said.

Do Dems have to compromise?

Most legislatio­n in the Senate requires the support of at least 10 Republican­s to advance the measure past a procedural hurdle known as the filibuster.

If Democrats cannot win Republican support for the package, they could advance legislatio­n through a procedure known as “budget reconcilia­tion,” which would require only a simple majority vote in the Senate.

Reconcilia­tion is a process, introduced in 1974, by which Congress can expedite passage of a bill bringing spending, revenue and debt- limit laws into compliance with fiscal priorities.

The process can be complex, involving committees that must spell out how the requested changes in spending could be “reconciled” with spending or budget limits.

If all 50 Senate Democrats stick together, they could approve a COVID- 19 bill with the help of Vice President Kamala Harris who could cast the tiebreakin­g 51st vote as president of the Senate.

Republican­s used the reconcilia­tion process in 2017 to push through a major change of the tax code.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D- N. Y., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D- Calif., filed reconcilia­tion legislatio­n Monday.

“We are hopeful that Republican­s will work in a bipartisan manner to support assistance for their communitie­s, but the American people cannot afford any more delays and the Congress must act to prevent more needless suffering,” they said.

The Congressio­nal Budget Office offered some encouragin­g signs for the economy.

The U. S. economy is expected to reach its pre- COVID- 19 level by mid- 2021, sooner than anticipate­d, and unemployme­nt is poised to fall more rapidly as a result of a milder downturn and earlier recovery from the pandemic, according to the budget office’s latest estimates released Monday.

That doesn’t mean the economy will be made whole after the ravages of the health crisis because output will still be below where it would have been had the outbreak not occurred.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States