USA TODAY International Edition
Distrust rooted in lies, loss
Accepting safety of vaccine harder for victims of eugenics
Consuelo Hermosillo’s 22- year- old granddaughter didn’t want to get a COVID- 19 vaccine.
The office worker at a special needs center was afraid the shot would prevent her from ever getting pregnant.
The mistrust didn’t form out of thin air.
In 1973, Hermosillo, an immigrant from Mexico, worked a small catering business at home while her husband bartended and unloaded appliances at a department store. In November of that year, the 24- year- old went to a hospital for an emergency caesarian section to give birth to her third child.
The baby would be her last. Hermosillo was sterilized without informed consent at the Los Angeles County- University of Southern California Medical Center.
“The biggest one is fear. That’s something that they remember, which affects their judgment in getting the vaccination.” Angelina Zayas Pastor, about memories of the sterilizations and experiments
“You better sign, or your baby is going to die,” she said a nurse told her.
Her signature is scribbled on a form allowing the procedure, but she doesn’t remember signing, saying she was medicated. She didn’t know she was sterilized until a doctor’s appointment later when she asked for birth control.
A whistleblower – a resident physician later let go by the hospital – leaked that the practice occurred on many
women. Hermosillo became one of 10 Mexican and Chicana plaintiffs in Madrigal v. Quilligan, a landmark federal class- action case in the mid- 1970s. The judge sided with Dr. Edward James Quilligan, and the women lost, but the case inspired legislation passed in 1979 to abolish the practice in California.
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors issued an apology in 2018 for the coerced sterilizations, but the women did not receive reparation money as victims did in other states, such as Virginia and North Carolina.
“As far as justice, they never received that,” said Virginia Espino, who documented the women’s stories as co- producer of a film called “No Mas Bebés,” (“No More Babies” in Spanish).
Espino, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, said it’s unclear how many women were sterilized at the LAC- USC medical center. The lawyer for the women who brought the lawsuit estimated “hundreds.”
Many didn’t speak fluent English and didn’t understand forms they signed, and in some cases, they were coerced into signing. Many had labor complications and were told lies that they or their babies would die if they didn’t sign.
Insidious sterilizations didn’t occur inside that hospital only. Throughout the 20th century, about 20,000 women and men were sterilized in California under state eugenics policies, according to researchers, including University of Michigan professor Alexandra Minna Stern. The policies targeted patients of state- run asylums or group homes. A disproportionate number were Hispanic.
As COVID- 19 vaccine rollout continues, hesitancy among vulnerable communities, including Hispanic people, is piqued – and history is unearthed.
Experts and those within the communities say the skepticism partly stems from unethical medical practices that targeted people of color. Unwanted sterilizations didn’t occur just in California among Mexican women but among Black women in the South, as well as Native American women.
From the 1930s through the 1970s, about a third of the female population in Puerto Rico was sterilized under population control policies that coerced women into postpartum sterilization after their second child’s birth, according to the University of Wisconsin’s Office of the Gender and Women’s Studies Librarian.
The first large- scale clinical trial for contraceptives involved Puerto Rican women: In 1956, the pills were tested on poor women in Rio Piédras, a housing project in San Juan, according to a historical review published in the Canadian Family Physician journal. The women didn’t know they were experimental.
“Women who stepped forward to describe side effects of nausea, dizziness, headaches, and blood clots were discounted as ‘ unreliable historians,’ ” wrote Dr. Pamela Verma Liao and Dr. Janet Dollin. The clinical trials involved pills with much higher hormone levels than today’s contraceptives.
“Despite the substantial positive effect of the pill, its history is marked by a lack of consent, a lack of full disclosure, a lack of true informed choice, and a lack of clinically relevant research regarding risk,” the authors said. “These are the pill’s cautionary tales.”
Angelina Zayas, a pastor at Grace and Peace Community Church that serves Chicago’s majority- Hispanic Belmont Cragin enclave, said many Puerto Rican women in her community are afraid to take COVID- 19 vaccines, citing memories of the sterilizations and experiments.
“The biggest one is fear,” said Zayas, who is Puerto Rican. “That’s something that they remember, which affects their judgment in getting the vaccination. They’re like, ‘ Well, how can I trust?’ ”
Who is ‘ worthy’ of children?
History’s cautionary tales didn’t stop the injustices from happening again.
Allegations of unwanted hysterectomies performed on mostly Hispanic women at Georgia’s Irwin Detention Center surfaced last year. From 2006 to 2010, more than 100 incarcerated women in California prisons, mostly Black and Latina, underwent hysterectomies without their consent. The Center for Investigative Reporting broke the news in 2013.
“If certain conditions are in place, and these are conditions that often include marginalized populations in carceral spaces, with little oversight of the authorities, those types of conditions can be ripe for sterilization abuse,” said Stern, author of the book “Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America.”
“We are still very much living with ... eugenic ideas of worth,” she said. “‘ Who is worthy of having children, and who is worthy of raising children?’ Those are very much eugenic ideas that are alive and well, and they affect policy and harm certain people.”
Under these policies, from 1907 through the 1970s, about 60,000 people underwent compulsory sterilizations nationwide.
Stern is studying a dataset of 30,000 sterilization records. She found that Latina patients in California were 59% more likely to be sterilized than nonLatinas. Hispanic men were 20% more likely to be sterilized than non- Hispanic men.
The disproportionate operations, Stern said, were rooted in a racist ideology that certain attributes – criminal behavior, homosexuality, poor health, welfare usage or education levels – were hereditary and could be minimized through preventing procreation.
Andrea Garcia, 19, from a Mexican family, was sterilized after being admitted into Pacific Colony, a psychiatric institution, for what evaluators called “truancy” and a low IQ test score.
“Mentally deficient. Sex delinquent girl. Unfit home,” reads her evaluation, an archival copy of which is included in Stern’s analyses. “Father was illiterate; mother subnormal ... one brother, four sisters thot to be subnormal.”
At Pacific Colony, sterilization was a precondition for release – another coercive factor, Stern noted. Sometimes people were released back to family members, sent to be helpers in households or perform menial labor jobs.
Garcia’s mother took legal action but lost the case.
Often, white women at the facility could escape the process, Stern said.
“What you have is a system in place that is stratified in such a way that is most likely to bring in certain people. A young white girl with truancy could get away with it. Unlike Andrea Garcia. She didn’t have that luxury, a safety net, she didn’t have anything,” Stern said, calling the policies “dehumanizing.”
Women of color ‘ robbed’
Espino said the abuses put women in unique difficulties. Some spouses didn’t trust that their wives were unwitting and thought they wanted the operations to be promiscuous. Factory worker Dolores Madrigal, the lead plaintiff in Madrigal v. Quilligan, said her husband took his anger out on her.
The sterilizations sent negative messages to women of color “that their mothering is not valued in the same way,” Espino said, “that they’re really only valued when they’re in the service of others: taking care of other people’s children or cooking for their masters. ... Women of color’s bodies typically are valued when they’re used in the service of making other people wealthy.”
The women, Espino said, were “robbed of their decision- making when it comes to the kind of family they want to have.”
Hermosillo, 71, reflected on the treatment of her and women like her.
“I think they were doing it to lower the value of us Mexicans,” Hermosillo said. “That’s what I think.”
She is grateful for her three children but dreamed of having more. As one of her fellow plaintiffs said, “Se me acabo la cancion” – “My song is finished.”
Hermosillo’s older sisters had more children. As the family grew, she’d fall quiet when relatives asked when she would have more kids. She battled feelings of shame and embarrassment.
“I hated baby showers,” she said. “Something happened to me.”
As a girl in Mexico, she lived between her grandmother’s house and foster homes. She learned to be a mom at a very young age. As a teenager, she immigrated to the USA with her mother and spent her days looking after her baby brother.
She didn’t tell her sisters or friends what happened at the hospital, sharing her story for the first time during the trial. She translated her love of babies and motherhood to working at the Women, Infants and Children ( WIC) program for seven years, teaching breastfeeding classes to new moms.
She wears a diamond necklace around her neck that she and her husband bought from one of her clients to help her with rent money.
The struggle stays with her.
“So many years passed,” she said, “but you don’t forget.”