USA TODAY International Edition
NFL owners set to vote on overtime, onside rules
The NFL draft will kick off in Cleveland one week from Thursday. But even with one of the league's biggest annual events on deck, there always seems to be ancillary business to conduct.
Some matters will be discussed Wednesday, when owners are scheduled to vote on rules, bylaws and resolution proposals. The NFL recently detailed suggestions in a memo, but we'll try to distill the 10 potential rule changes down to the basics. ( Each proposal must be approved by at least 75% of the owners – a minimum of 24 – to be adopted.)
Eliminate OT in preseason games
Pretty self- explanatory as no one from fans to ( apparently) club executives want to see a ragged additional period decided by backups to the backups on a Friday or Saturday summer night.
Establish a maximum number of players in the ‘ setup zone’
For one year, the competition committee wants to see if onside kick recoveries increase by limiting the amount of players the receiving team can place in the “setup zone” – the area between 10 and 25 yards from the spot of the kickoff. The proposal would limit the receiving team to nine players there, theoretically limiting its ability to recover onside kick attempts, which have become more difficult to execute since the NFL eliminated running starts for the kicking team to enhance player safety.
Expand prohibition on blocking below the waist
The competition committee is proposing a 15- yard penalty for “blocking below the waist by offensive and defensive players on scrimmage downs when contact occurs beyond five yards on either side of the line of scrimmage and more than two yards outside of either offensive tackle.”
Permit replay officials and designated members of the officiating department to provide objective information to on- field officials
“When clear and obvious video evidence is present,” this proposal would allow for game- day crews to get help as it pertains to correcting on- field rulings pertaining ( but not limited) to receptions, interceptions, fumbles, plays on the boundaries, spotting the ball and whether or not a player is down by contact. Basically, on- site officials would get a helping hand on properly legislating objective plays when warranted – though the designated support from the officiating department “does not have the authority to instruct the on- field game officials to assess a penalty against a player,” a replay restriction that's already woven into the rulebook.
Ensure enforcement of all accepted penalties committed by either team during successive try attempts
Proposed by the Bears, it wouldn't allow a team to benefit after committing a penalty on a two- point try. In other words, if a team is flagged while attempting a two- point conversion and then decides to go for the extra point instead, it can't later line up for a closer attempt on a two- point play if the defending team subsequently commits a penalty on the extra- point try ( which would otherwise effectively negate the original foul on the first two- point attempt).
Loss of down for illegal forward pass
The Rams propose offending teams incur a 5- yard penalty loss of down if they attempt a second forward pass from behind the line of scrimmage on a play or attempt what would be an illegal forward pass if the ball has already crossed the line of scrimmage. A ball illegally passed forward beyond the line of scrimmage already results in a flag and loss of down. The Rams' proposal would prohibit teams from getting another chance to extend a drive by getting to replay a down after being penalized 5 yards for an illegal second forward pass or benefit from yards gained if the defensive team chose to decline.
Expand jersey number options for certain positions
The Chiefs would like to see the NFL loosen its restrictions on which players can wear given numbers, which sometimes puts teams in a bind. It would allow defensive backs to wear numbers between 1 and 49, while running backs, receivers and tight ends could also have access to anything between 1 and 49 as well as 80 through 89. Linebackers would be eligible for any numbers excepting those between 60 and 79.
Change options for winner of overtime coin toss, create true sudden- death format
Courtesy of the Ravens and Eagles, this proposal would revolutionize overtime yet again while aiming to minimize any advantage winning the coin toss confers. The winner of the coin toss would either choose to spot the ball anywhere on the field to start overtime – in lieu of a kickoff – and allow the other team to take possession or opt to defend
instead defer the spot of the ball to the loser of the coin toss, then decide whether to take possession at the designated spot or play defense. First team to score wins, though the game will be ruled a tie if no one scores after 10 minutes.
Change options for winner of overtime coin toss, modify extra period
In an alternate overtime proposal submitted only by the Ravens, the previously outlined suggestions for the coin toss, lack of a kickoff, spotting of the ball at any point of the field and one team choosing to play offense or defense would still apply. However in this framework, the game would not end in sudden death. Instead, OT would last 7 minutes and 30 seconds ( half a standard quarter). Once time expires, the team with the most points wins, or the game is declared a tie if the score remains knotted.
New mechanism to retain possession instead of onside kick
The Eagles propose that a team could be granted two opportunities per game to retain possession after a score without having to use the onside kick stratagem. Instead, after a score, a team would be allowed to maintain possession by executing a 4th- and- 15 play from its own 25- yard line. Convert, and the team with the ball gets a fresh set of downs; fail to convert, and the other team takes possession at the dead- ball spot deep in their opponent's end of the field.