USA TODAY International Edition

Why the first 100 days matter

The greatest presidents take the lead and never relinquish it, even if the ground is sometimes muddy

- Barbara A. Perry Presidenti­al historian Barbara A. Perry is the Gerald L. Baliles Professor and Director of Presidenti­al Studies at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt served an unpreceden­ted 4,422 days in office, but his first 100 set a benchmark by which his successors are inevitably measured. The milestone’s origin in FDR’s presidency coincided with the convergenc­e of a worldwide economic depression, a Midwest climate crisis and an activist chief executive who created a bureaucrat­ic behemoth to address the disasters.

FDR declared in his first inaugural address that he was prepared to exercise “broad executive power to wage a war against the emergency.” His 1932 victory over Herbert Hoover signaled the people’s “mandate that they want direct, vigorous action. … They have made me the present instrument of their wishes,” Roosevelt concluded.

A few months later, the president referred to “the crowding events of the hundred days which had been devoted to the starting of the wheels of the New Deal.”

With Democratic Party majorities in both houses of Congress, FDR signed an unsurpasse­d 76 bills into law by the 100- day mark, and he managed to calm the nation with his patented fireside addresses, delivered in soothing tones that supporters found accessible despite their patrician lilt.

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill observed that meeting FDR was like uncorking your first bottle of champagne. With the unemployme­nt rate at 25%, the nation rallied to his effervesce­nt personalit­y. His jaunty cigarette holder, broad smile and upturned face radiated confidence.

‘ Hope’ and ‘ change’

This image so embodied American optimism that a Time magazine cover featured it with President- elect Barack Obama’s face superimpos­ed over FDR’s visage, just after the historic election of the first Black president.

The 2008 financial collapse, which threatened another Great Depression, prompted Obama’s “hope” and “change” campaign themes. They resonated with a desperate electorate. He echoed Roosevelt’s inaugural clarion call in his own address: “The state of our economy calls for action, bold and swift. And we will act, not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth.”

Just shy of his month in office, Obama signed the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestme­nt Act to stimulate the economy with roughly $ 800 billion in tax cuts and new spending.

Biden’s campaign and transition team focused on the COVID- 19 relief package ( signed on March 11), vaccinatin­g 100 million Americans by Day 100 ( meeting the goal on Day 59 and doubling it) and introducin­g a $ 2 trillion infrastruc­ture bill ( late March).

And let’s not forget the slew of executive orders that activist presidents can sign unilateral­ly, starting on Day One of their administra­tions.

Presidents have embraced the first 100 days as proof of their initial efficacy, but does it correlate with success in office and in the eyes of history?

FDR won four presidenti­al terms, and scholars rank him among the three greatest presidents ( along with George Washington and Abraham Lincoln), so his productive first 100 days were indeed a positive and accurate harbinger.

Approval ratings provide one measure of how the electorate views the president’s earliest performanc­e. Since Dwight Eisenhower, four chief executives ( Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Obama and Donald Trump) have seen drops in their ratings from inaugurati­on to the 100- day mark. For Carter and Trump, the decline might have foreshadow­ed their reelection losses. Yet Clinton and Obama each earned second terms.

Presidency as Kentucky Derby

Despite the best- laid plans for early triumphs, disaster can befall presidents in the first months. John F. Kennedy’s ill- fated Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961 devastated him — but because he accepted blame as “the responsibl­e officer of the government,” his approval soared to 83%.

Ronald Reagan nearly died from an assassinat­ion attempt in March 1981. His courage and grace in the face of death earned him a 17- point surge in approval ratings that reflected bipartisan admiration in his first 100 days.

President Biden’s 100- day milepost falls on the eve of this year’s Kentucky Derby. If media and pundits cover elections as if they were horse races, does the new president bolt from the starting gate quickly and smoothly, hitting his stride early? Or does he stumble from the post and have to make up ground as his opponents race ahead? Is he bumped by others on the track or hemmed in by circumstan­ces? Does he set the wrong pace and run out of steam as the race progresses? Is the track muddy and difficult to gain traction on? Or is it lightning fast?

The greatest presidents take the lead and never relinquish it, even if the ground they cover is occasional­ly sloppy. Yet others, like Clinton, endure early stumbles to earn another 1,461 days in the winner’s circle, also known as the Oval Office.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States